Cited by 97Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlECG Monitoring and Analysis

Developing an algorithm for pulse oximetry derived respiratory rate (RRoxi): a healthy volunteer study

Open access
Addison, Paul S., Watson, James N., Mestek, Michael L., Mecca, Roger S.·2012·Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The presence of respiratory information within the pulse oximeter signal (PPG) is a well-documented phenomenon. However, extracting this information for the purpose of continuously monitoring respiratory rate requires: (1) the recognition of the multi-faceted manifestations of respiratory modulation components within the PPG and the complex interactions among them; (2) the implementation of appropriate advanced signal processing techniques to take full advantage of this information; and (3) the post-processing infrastructure to deliver a clinically useful reported respiratory rate to the end user. A holistic algorithmic approach to the problem is therefore required. We have developed the RR(OXI) algorithm based on this principle and its performance on healthy subject trial data is described herein. METHODS: Finger PPGs were collected from a cohort of 139 healthy adult volunteers monitored during free breathing over an 8-min period. These were subsequently processed using a novel in-house algorithm based on continuous wavelet transform technology within an infrastructure incorporating weighted averaging and logical decision making processes. The computed oximeter respiratory rates (RR(oxi)) were then compared to an end-tidal CO2 reference rate RR(ETCO2). RESULTS: RR(ETCO2) ranged from a lowest recorded value of 2.97 breaths per min (br/min) to a highest value of 28.02 br/min. The mean rate was 14.49 br/min with standard deviation of 4.36 br/min. Excellent agreement was found between RR(oxi) and RR(ETCO2), with a mean difference of -0.23 br/min and standard deviation of 1.14 br/min. The two measures are tightly spread around the line of agreement with a strong correlation observable between them (R2 = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that RR(oxi) represents a viable technology for the measurement of respiratory rate of healthy individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10877-011-9332-y

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RIIV modulates the DC baseline of the PPG curve superimposing the wave on top of a low frequency sinusoid.

    “RIIV modulates the DC baseline of the PPG curve superimposing the wave on top of a low frequency sinusoid.”
  • RIFV induces a phase shift between each cycle by elongating or squeezing each wave.

    “RIFV induces a phase shift between each cycle by elongating or squeezing each wave.”
  • RIAV causes significant changes in each peak amplitude.

    “RIAV causes significant changes in each peak amplitude.”
  • Dehkordi et al. and Addison et al. identified three significant variations to the PPG signal by respiratory rate: respiratory-induced intensity variation (RIIV), respiratory-induced amplitude variation (RIAV), and respiratory induced frequency variation (RIFV).

    “Dehkordi et al. and Addison et al. identified the three significant variations to the PPG signal by respiratory rate after analyzing PPG from 139 healthy adults (67–18 years old) and the Capnobase dataset [115,121]. These variations are respiratory-induced intensity variation (RIIV), respiratory-induced amplitude variation (RIAV), and respiratory induced frequency variation (RIFV), as shown in FIG”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Addison, P. S., Watson, J. N., Mestek, M. L., & Mecca, R. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Addison, Paul S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2012-01-10
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
45-51
ISSN
  • 1387-1307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2614
OpenAlex
W2014322746
Cited by
97
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
pulse oximetry, respiratory rate, photoplethysmography, continuous wavelet transform, end-tidal carbon dioxide, non-invasive respiratory monitoring, signal processing, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Oximetry, Reference Values, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Body Mass Index, Young Adult, Respiratory Rate, Wavelet Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review