Cited by 69Cancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic Care

Psycho-Spiritual Integrative Therapy for Women with Primary Breast Cancer

Garlick, Max, Wall, Kathleen, Corwin, Diana, Koopman, Cheryl·2011·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Breast cancer presents physical and psychological challenges, but can also result in posttraumatic growth (PTG). Twenty-four women completed Psycho-Spiritual Integrative Therapy (PSIT) treatment and completed assessments for PTG and QOL before, immediately following, and 1 month after treatment. Women showed improvement (p < .01) on the FACT-B (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast) Physical Well-being, Emotional Well-being, and Functional Well-being subscales, on the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Depression, Anger, and Fatigue subscales (p < .05), and on their POMS Tension, Vigor and Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) scores (p < .01). Also, women showed improvement on the FACIT-Sp-Ex (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual) Meaning/Peace subscale, the Spiritual Well-being total scale (p < .01), and on the New Possibilities (p < .01) and Personal Strength (p < .05) subscales of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). This preliminary study suggests that PSIT may improve well being and stimulate PTG in breast cancer patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-011-9224-9

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Available data suggest that spiritually-based interventions may improve quality of life and physical recovery in cancer patients.

    “Although few spiritually-based interventions have been tested in cancer patients, available data suggest that they may improve quality of life and physical recovery. 39-41”
  • Findings of physical benefits from interventions designed to enhance R/S indicate that R/S does contribute to better health.

    “findings of physical benefits from interventions designed to enhance R/S indicate that R/S does contribute to better health.39-41”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garlick, M., Wall, K., Corwin, D., & Koopman, C.
Affiliations
  • Sofia University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Koopman, Cheryl
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2011-02-23
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
78-90
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W1966299789
Cited by
69
References
82
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
breast cancer, posttraumatic growth, quality of life, spiritual well-being, mood disturbance, depression, fatigue, anger, FACT-B
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Emotions, Existentialism, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy, Brief, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Carcinoma, Lobular, Meditation, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review