Cited by 89Cancer survivorship and carePsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionResilience and Mental Health

Post-traumatic Growth in Breast Cancer Survivors: New Insights into its Relationships with Well-Being and Distress.

Ruini, Chiara, Vescovelli, Francesca, Albieri, Elisa·2013·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Research investigating possible relations between Post-traumatic growth (PTG) and clinical indexes--such as psychosocial distress, physical and psychological well-being--is lacking in medical settings. The aim of this study was to look into such relationships in breast cancer survivors (Bcs) and in healthy control subjects who experienced other stressful events. Sixty Bcs and 60 healthy women reporting other stressful events were compared according to the following scales: Post-traumatic Growth Inventory, Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB), Symptom Questionnaire and Psychosocial Index. Bcs reported significantly higher levels of PTG and distress, and lower levels of PWB compared to healthy women. Bcs with high levels of PTG showed increased levels of physical well-being and decreased distress. Healthy women under stressful circumstances reporting high levels of PTG showed increased levels of PWB. PTG levels were higher in Bcs and associated with decreased psychological distress and somatisation. These results carry important implications for clinical assessment, as well as for planning interventions to improve well-being and resilience in oncology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-012-9340-1

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruini, C., Vescovelli, F., & Albieri, E.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Ruini, Chiara
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2012-12-11
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
383-391
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2059726150
Cited by
89
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, breast cancer survivors, psychological well-being, psychological distress, somatization, resilience, life events, physical well-being, psychosocial distress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Italy, Life Change Events, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Survivors, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review