Cited by 80Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology Research

Optimism and Subjective Well-Being: Affectivity Plays a Secondary Role in the Relationship Between Optimism and Global Life Satisfaction in the Middle-Aged Women. Longitudinal and Cross-Cultural Findings

Daukantaitė, Daiva, Zukauskiene, Rita·2012·Journal of Happiness Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-010-9246-2

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daukantaitė, D., & Zukauskiene, R.
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2011-01-21
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W2025138161
Cited by
80
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
optimism, subjective well-being, positive affect, negative affect, affectivity, middle-aged women, cross-cultural comparison, Swedish women, Lithuanian women, cognitive-affective model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review