Cited by 99Migration, Health and TraumaMental Health Treatment and AccessMigration, Identity, and Health

Barriers Accessing Mental Health Services Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Immigrant Women in Australia: Policy Implications

Wohler, Yvonne, Dantas, Jaya AR·2017·Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

Abstract

Immigrant and refugee women from diverse ethnic backgrounds encounter multiple barriers in accessing mental healthcare in various settings. A systematic review on the prevalence of mental health disorders among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) women in Australia documented the following barriers: logistical, language and communication, dissonance between participants and care providers and preference for alternative interventions. This article proposes recommendations for policies to better address the mental health needs of immigrant and refugee women. Key policy recommendations include: support for gender specific research, implementation and evaluation of transcultural policies, cultural responsiveness in service delivery, review of immigration and refugee claims policies and social integration of immigrants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10903-016-0402-6

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People from culturally and linguistically diverse groups are less likely to engage mental health services than members of the wider population, due to a lack of knowledge of services and how to access them, communication barriers, financial barriers, racism, and culturally insensitive practices.

    “For example, people from culturally and linguistically diverse groups are less likely to engage mental health services than members of the wider population, due to a lack of knowledge of services and how to access them, communication barriers, financial barriers, racism, and culturally insensitive practices [95–97].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wohler, Y., & Dantas, J. A.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wohler, Yvonne
Venue
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
Published
2016-03-22
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
697-701
ISSN
  • 1557-1912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1920
OpenAlex
W2308388745
Cited by
99
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Identity, and Health
Keywords
access to mental health care, immigrant women, refugee women, culturally and linguistically diverse populations, language barriers, cultural barriers, cultural responsiveness, mental health policy, social integration, Australia
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Communication Barriers, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Language, Mental Health Services, Socioeconomic Factors, Cultural Diversity, Qualitative Research, Emigrants and Immigrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review