Cited by 274Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityElectronic Health Records SystemsBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Proposed Solution and Future Direction for Blockchain-Based Heterogeneous Medicare Data in Cloud Environment

Open access

Abstract

The healthcare data is an important asset and rich source of healthcare intellect. Medical databases, if created properly, will be large, complex, heterogeneous and time varying. The main challenge nowadays is to store and process this data efficiently so that it can benefit humans. Heterogeneity in the healthcare sector in the form of medical data is also considered to be one of the biggest challenges for researchers. Sometimes, this data is referred to as large-scale data or big data. Blockchain technology and the Cloud environment have proved their usability separately. Though these two technologies can be combined to enhance the exciting applications in healthcare industry. Blockchain is a highly secure and decentralized networking platform of multiple computers called nodes. It is changing the way medical information is being stored and shared. It makes the work easier, keeps an eye on the security and accuracy of the data and also reduces the cost of maintenance. A Blockchain-based platform is proposed that can be used for storing and managing electronic medical records in a Cloud environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-018-1007-5

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Eyal, I., and Emin, G. S., Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. In proceedings of the international conference on financial cryptography and data security, Christ Church, Barbados. Berlin: Springer, 2014.
  2. Padhy, R. P., Patra, M. R., and Satapathy, S. C., Design and implementation of a cloud based rural healthcare information system model. Univ. J. Appl. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2(1):149–157, 2012.
  3. Kaur, H., Chauhan, R., and Alam, M., Spatial clustering algorithm using R-tree. J. Comput. 3(2):85–90, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 274

Metadata

Authors
Kaur, H., Alam, M. A., Jameel, R., Mourya, A. K., & Chang, V.
Affiliations
  • Jamia Hamdard (IN)
  • Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Corresponding author
Mourya, Ashish Kumar
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2018-07-10
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
156-156
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W2878975049
Cited by
274
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 2
FWCI
57.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Council for Science and Technology Communications (NCSTC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Ministry of Science and Technology (Govt. of India), New Delhi, India (5753/ IFD/ 2015-16)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, cloud computing, electronic health records, big data, data security, decentralized storage, health data management, Medicare data
MeSH terms
Cloud Computing, Delivery of Health Care, Medicare, Humans, United States, Databases, Factual, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review