The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Proposed Solution and Future Direction for Blockchain-Based Heterogeneous Medicare Data in Cloud Environment
Open accessAbstract
The healthcare data is an important asset and rich source of healthcare intellect. Medical databases, if created properly, will be large, complex, heterogeneous and time varying. The main challenge nowadays is to store and process this data efficiently so that it can benefit humans. Heterogeneity in the healthcare sector in the form of medical data is also considered to be one of the biggest challenges for researchers. Sometimes, this data is referred to as large-scale data or big data. Blockchain technology and the Cloud environment have proved their usability separately. Though these two technologies can be combined to enhance the exciting applications in healthcare industry. Blockchain is a highly secure and decentralized networking platform of multiple computers called nodes. It is changing the way medical information is being stored and shared. It makes the work easier, keeps an eye on the security and accuracy of the data and also reduces the cost of maintenance. A Blockchain-based platform is proposed that can be used for storing and managing electronic medical records in a Cloud environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The results of the review indicate that research in the domain of blockchain in healthcare has been largely directed at promoting the development of concepts that assist scholars in deriving multidomain (Kaur et al., 2018) and feasible applications for blockchain in healthcare.”
From Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda (2020) · cites this paper as Kaur et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The scalability and performance efficiency of a framework may also be affected by issues such as requirements for continual upgrades by the utilized system (Kaur et al., 2018), the computational load of sensor data (Zhang et al., 2016), keyword set size (A. Zhang & Lin, 2018), the amount of disk space, and the network set-up required by the type of blockchain, e.g.Ethereum, used in the model (Qua”
From Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda (2020) · cites this paper as Kaur et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“The limitation of the work is that comparisons have not been made between smart contract-based schemes and traditional schemes, and the model was not implemented to analyze performances.”
From A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions (2021) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential
Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014) · Health Information Science and Systems · doi:10.1186/2047-2501-2-3 · Cited by 3,034
The rise of big data on cloud computing: Review and open research issues
Hashem, I. A. T., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N. B., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A., & Ullah Khan, S. (2015) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2014.07.006 · Cited by 2,656
MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management
Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016) · 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD) · doi:10.1109/obd.2016.11 · Cited by 2,526
The KDD process for extracting useful knowledge from volumes of data
Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/240455.240464 · Cited by 1,934
Blockchain: A Panacea for Healthcare Cloud-Based Data Security and Privacy?
Esposito, C., Santis, A. D., Tortora, G., Chang, H., & Choo, K. R. (2018) · IEEE Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/mcc.2018.011791712 · Cited by 857
Liang, X., Shetty, S. S., Tosh, D. K., Kamhoua, C., Kwiat, K., & Njilla, L. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid) · doi:10.1109/ccgrid.2017.8 · Cited by 745
Bell, G., Hey, T., & Szalay, A. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170411 · Cited by 537
Enigma: Decentralized Computation Platform with Guaranteed Privacy
Zyskind, G., & Pentland, A. (2018) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11636.003.0018 · Cited by 467
‘Big data’, Hadoop and cloud computing in genomics
O’Driscoll, A., Daugelaite, J., & Sleator, R. D. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.07.001 · Cited by 448
Blockchain Technology: Applications in Health Care
Angraal, S., Krumholz, H. M., & Schulz, W. L. (2017) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003800 · Cited by 430
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Eyal, I., and Emin, G. S., Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. In proceedings of the international conference on financial cryptography and data security, Christ Church, Barbados. Berlin: Springer, 2014.
- Padhy, R. P., Patra, M. R., and Satapathy, S. C., Design and implementation of a cloud based rural healthcare information system model. Univ. J. Appl. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2(1):149–157, 2012.
- Kaur, H., Chauhan, R., and Alam, M., Spatial clustering algorithm using R-tree. J. Comput. 3(2):85–90, 2011.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain technology in healthcare: a systematic review
Agbo, C. C., Mahmoud, Q. H., & Eklund, J. M. (2019) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare7020056 · Cited by 1,131
A Survey on Blockchain Interoperability: Past, Present, and Future Trends
Belchior, R., Vasconcelos, A., Guerreiro, S. L. P. D., & Correia, M. P. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3471140 · Cited by 807
Blockchain for industry 4.0: a comprehensive review
Bodkhe, U., Tanwar, S., Parekh, K., Khanpara, P., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988579 · Cited by 766
Blockchain Technology in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review and Directions for Future Research
Khezr, S., Moniruzzaman, M., Yassine, A., & Benlamri, R. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9091736 · Cited by 575
Habib, G., Sharma, S., Ibrahim, S., Ahmad, I., Qureshi, S., & Malik, I. A. (2022) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi14110341 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaur, H., Alam, M. A., Jameel, R., Mourya, A. K., & Chang, V.
- Affiliations
- Jamia Hamdard (IN)
- Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Mourya, Ashish Kumar
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Systems
- Published
- 2018-07-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 156-156
- ISSN
- 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-689X
- OpenAlex
- W2878975049
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 57.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.tees.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TeesRep (Teesside University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Council for Science and Technology Communications (NCSTC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Ministry of Science and Technology (Govt. of India), New Delhi, India (5753/ IFD/ 2015-16)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Keywords
- blockchain, cloud computing, electronic health records, big data, data security, decentralized storage, health data management, Medicare data
- MeSH terms
- Cloud Computing, Delivery of Health Care, Medicare, Humans, United States, Databases, Factual, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
