Cited by 21Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and Education

Effectiveness of Wearable Device-based Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A System Review and Meta-Analysis

Luo, Jingsong, Zhang, Ke, Xu, Yaxin, Tao, Yanmin, Zhang, Qi·2022·Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract

With the development of flexible electronics and chip technology, the application value of wearable devices in lifelong treatment of chronic diseases is increasing. In view of its rapid development and diversified forms, wearable device-based intervention seems to provide a promising option to solve the problems of long-term glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, to date, it is unclear whether the intervention based on wearable device is effective on glycemic control in patients with T2D. In order to explore whether this choice is effective in glycemic control in patients with T2D, after database search and study screening, 6 studies and 1001 patients were selected from 181studies for this meta-analysis. The results guided that the wearable device-based intervention may be more effective than usual care on glycemic control in patients with T2D. Subgroup analysis showed that when the duration of intervention was equal to or less than 12 weeks, the effect of wearable device-based intervention was significantly different from that of usual care, but when the intervention duration greater than 12 weeks, the effect was not significantly different. The intervention effect of wearable devices with goal-setting or encouragement functions was significantly better than that of usual care, and there was no significant difference between automatic drug delivery wearable devices and usual care. In conclusion, the wearable device-based intervention is effective on glycemic control in patients with T2D. In general, this choice of wearable devices for patients with T2D may be effective to some extent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-021-01797-6

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Leslie RD. United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS): what now or so what? Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 15(1):65-71, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-7560(199901/02)15:1/65::aid-dmrr3/3.0.co;2-x · DOI

Cited by

Authors
Luo, J., Zhang, K., Xu, Y., Tao, Y., & Zhang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Shanxi Datong University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Qi
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2021-12-24
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
11-11
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W4200375084
Cited by
21
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
wearable devices, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, digital health interventions, goal setting, intervention duration, usual care comparison
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Glycemic Control, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review