Cited by 188Physical Activity and HealthMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Can consumer wearable activity tracker-based interventions improve physical activity and cardiometabolic health in patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Franssen, Wouter M. A., Franssen, Gregor H. L. M., Spaas, Jan, Solmi, Francesca, Eijnde, Bert O.·2020·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

Background: To date, it is unclear if consumer wearable activity trackers (CWATs), with or without behaviour multi-component strategies, effectively improve adherence to physical activity and health outcomes under free living conditions in populations with chronic diseases. Therefore, we systematically evaluated the efficacy of CWAT-based interventions to promote physical activity levels and cardiometabolic health in populations with chronic diseases. Methods: Randomised controlled trials were collected from five bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and CINAHL). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated a CWAT-based counselling intervention versus control intervention among patients with chronic respiratory diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, overweight/obesity, cognitive disorders, or sedentary older adults. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: After deduplication 8147 were identified of which 35 studies met inclusion criteria (chronic respiratory diseases: 7, type 2 diabetes mellitus: 12, cardiovascular diseases: 6, overweight/obesity: 3, cognitive disorders: 1, sedentary older adults: 6). Compared to control groups, CWAT-based interventions significantly increased physical activity by 2123 steps per day (95% confidence interval [CI], [1605–2641]; p < 0.001). In addition, CWAT-based interventions in these populations significantly decreased systolic blood pressure (− 3.79 mm Hg; 95% CI: [− 4.53, − 3.04] mm Hg; p < 0.001), waist circumference (− 0.99 cm; 95% CI: [− 1.48, − 0.50] cm; p < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration (− 5.70 mg/dl; 95% CI: [− 9.24, − 2.15] mg/dl; p = 0.002). Conclusion: CWAT-based interventions increase physical activity and have beneficial effects on important health-related outcomes such as systolic blood pressure, waist circumference and LDL cholesterol concentration in patients with chronic diseases.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 randomised controlled trials found that consumer wearable activity tracker (CWAT)-based interventions in chronic disease populations increased physical activity by 2123 steps/day and improved systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, and LDL cholesterol versus control. The authors conclude CWAT-based interventions can increase physical activity and benefit cardiometabolic health, though heterogeneity and limited direct linkage between step changes and risk factors remain.

Key findings

  • Across 35 RCTs (2858 participants), CWAT-based interventions significantly increased physical activity by 2123 steps/day versus control (95% CI 1605–2641; p < 0.001). Subgroup increases were chronic respiratory diseases +1314 steps/day, T2DM +2693, CVD +1300, overweight/obesity +2405, and sedentary older adults +2568.
  • CWAT-based interventions significantly decreased waist circumference (−0.99 cm; 95% CI −1.48 to −0.50; p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (−3.79 mm Hg; 95% CI −4.53 to −3.04; p < 0.001), and LDL cholesterol (−5.70 mg/dl; 95% CI −9.24 to −2.15; p = 0.002). No significant changes were found for body weight, BMI, diastolic blood pressure, resting heart rate, HbA1c, fasting glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, or HDL cholesterol.
  • Meta-regression showed younger age (β = −189.3; p = 0.007) and sex proportion (β = 41.0; p = 0.039) were associated with greater increases in physical activity; patients with chronic respiratory diseases or CVD had significantly lower increases than other chronic disease populations (p < 0.001). Intervention duration and intervention type were not significantly associated with physical activity.
  • Only one study concerned cognitive disorders and was not included in the meta-analysis; no significant improvement in physical activity was found in patients with Alzheimer’s disease after an 8-week intervention.

Methods

  • Systematic review and explorative meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019124126) and reported per PRISMA; searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CINAHL from inception to March 2019, limited to English, German, and Dutch.
  • Eligible studies were peer-reviewed RCTs in adults with chronic respiratory diseases, T2DM, CVD, overweight/obesity, cognitive disorders, or sedentary older adults (> 55 years), comparing a CWAT-based intervention with control/usual care; physical activity had to be objectively measured as steps/day. Dietary interventions and interventions shorter than 6 weeks were excluded.
  • Random-effects meta-analysis calculated mean differences with 95% CIs; mixed-effects meta-regression assessed population and study characteristics; heterogeneity was quantified with chi-squared and I²; publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger test; risk of bias used the Cochrane tool.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: included studies had relatively small sample sizes and varied intervention durations; heterogeneous multi-component designs made the independent contribution of components difficult to establish; only 11 studies evaluated steps/day together with cardiometabolic risk factors, so no direct association or minimal step target could be determined; CWATs were used both to measure and motivate physical activity, possibly affecting control groups; and studies measured physical activity but not sedentary time.
  • Stated by the authors: physical activity results were highly heterogeneous (Q = 375.2, p < 0.001; I² = 92), and significant publication bias was found in subgroup analyses for CVD (p = 0.012), overweight/obesity (p = 0.037), and sedentary older adults (p = 0.004).
  • Evident from the text: risk of bias was high or unclear for blinding of participants/personnel and outcome assessors; allocation concealment was inadequately reported in 21 of 35 studies; only 8 studies blinded outcome assessors; and 3 studies had high attrition bias. Evidence for cognitive disorders was limited to a single study.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-020-00955-2

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

23 of 50 cited sources checked · 15 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Most reviews did not (or partly) report a cardiometabolic risk profile.

    “In addition, conclusions are not based on randomised controlled trials [14, 22] and most of reviews did not (or partly) report a cardiometabolic risk profile [15, 19, 20, 23].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [15] Coughlin SS, Stewart J. Use of Consumer Wearable Devices to Promote Physical Activity: A Review of Health Intervention Studies. Journal of environment and health sciences. 2016;2(6). source
    • cites [19] Baskerville R, Ricci-Cabello I, Roberts N, Farmer A. Impact of accelerometer and pedometer use on physical activity and glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2017;34(5):612–20. source
    • cites [20] de Vries HJ, Kooiman TJ, van Ittersum MW, van Brussel M, de Groot M. Do activity monitors increase physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(10):2078–91. source
    • cites [23] Qiu SH, Cai X, Wang XY, He C, Zugel M, Steinacker JM, et al. Using step counters to promote physical activity and exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018;12:14. source
  • Premisecitation

    Armstrong et al. found that pedometer-based physical activity promotion increased steps per day (+1000 steps/day) when used as an intervention alone or alongside pulmonary rehabilitation.

    “Armstrong et al. found that pedometer-based physical activity promotion increased steps per day (+ 1000 steps/day) when it is used as an intervention alone or alongside pulmonary rehabilitation [67].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] Armstrong M, Winnard A, Chynkiamis N, Boyle S, Burtin C, Vogiatzis I. Use of pedometers as a tool to promote daily physical activity levels in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society. 2019;28(154). source
  • Findingcitation

    We also found a significantly decreased waist circumference with the same magnitude (−1.19 cm; 95% CI: [−1.79, −0.59] cm) as found in another published meta-analysis in which the effect of physical activity and dietary interventions on waist circumference was evaluated.

    “We also found a significantly decreased waist circumference with the same magnitude (− 1.19 cm; 95% CI: [− 1.79, − 0.59] cm) as found in another published meta-analysis in which the effect of physical activity and dietery interventions on waist circumference was evaluated [11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Patnode CD, Evans CV, Senger CA, Redmond N, Lin JS. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without known cardiovascular disease risk factors: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. Jama. 2017;318(2):175–93. source
  • Premisecitation

    A larger effect size for interventions that were multifaceted was found compared to CWAT-only interventions.

    “However, a larger effect size for interventions that were multifaceted was found compared to CWAT-only interventions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74] Brickwood KJ, Watson G, O'Brien J, Williams AD. Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2019;7(4):e11819. source
  • Premisecitation

    Sedentary behaviour is a risk factor for cardiometabolic health and all-cause mortality, independently of the amount of physical activity.

    “It has been shown that sedentary behaviour is a risk factor for cardiometabilic health and all-cause mortality, indepently of the amount of physical activity [86, 87].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [86] Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthews CE, et al. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80000. source
    • cites [87] van der Berg JD, Stehouwer CD, Bosma H, van der Velde JH, Willems PJ, Savelberg HH, et al. Associations of total amount and patterns of sedentary behaviour with type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: the Maastricht study. Diabetologia. 2016;59(4):709–18. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that more sedentary time was associated with higher odds of metabolic syndrome independently of higher-intensity physical activity. It does not report an all-cause mortality finding, and it cautions that the study’s cross-sectional design cannot establish a causal risk factor. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increased physical activity has significant health benefits and is associated with the prevention and delayed onset of many chronic diseases.

    “On the other hand, it is well known that increased physical activity has significant health benefits and is associated with the prevention and delayed onset of many chronic diseases [4, 6].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Lee I-M, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–29. source

      The Introduction and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) describe substantial health benefits of physical activity and estimate that becoming active could avert cases of coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and breast and colon cancers. Our copy does not establish that physical activity delays the onset of those diseases specifically; its life-expectancy findings concern mortality, not age at disease onset. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [6] Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine–evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(S3):1–72. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Structured behaviour change strategies are often resource-intensive and time-consuming, factors that limit long-term adherence and are usually not feasible in routine clinical care.

    “However, these strategies are often resource-intensive and time-consuming, factors that limit long-term adherence and usually not feasible in routine clinical care [15].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Coughlin SS, Stewart J. Use of Consumer Wearable Devices to Promote Physical Activity: A Review of Health Intervention Studies. Journal of environment and health sciences. 2016;2(6). source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says established physical-activity and weight-loss interventions are resource-intensive and time-consuming, limiting full participation and widespread dissemination. It does not say these factors limit long-term adherence or make the strategies usually infeasible in routine clinical care. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Recent reviews have shown that CWATs have potential to increase physical activity.

    “Although recent reviews have shown that CWATs have potential to increase physical activity, they included only one type of chronic disease [19, 20] or solely pedometers [14, 21].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] Baskerville R, Ricci-Cabello I, Roberts N, Farmer A. Impact of accelerometer and pedometer use on physical activity and glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2017;34(5):612–20. source
    • cites [20] de Vries HJ, Kooiman TJ, van Ittersum MW, van Brussel M, de Groot M. Do activity monitors increase physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(10):2078–91. source
    • cites [14] Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. Jama. 2007;298(19):2296–304. source
    • cites [21] Qiu S, Cai X, Chen X, Yang B, Sun Z. Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med. 2014;12:36. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent reviews of CWATs included only one type of chronic disease or solely pedometers.

    “Although recent reviews have shown that CWATs have potential to increase physical activity, they included only one type of chronic disease [19, 20] or solely pedometers [14, 21].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] Baskerville R, Ricci-Cabello I, Roberts N, Farmer A. Impact of accelerometer and pedometer use on physical activity and glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2017;34(5):612–20. source
    • cites [20] de Vries HJ, Kooiman TJ, van Ittersum MW, van Brussel M, de Groot M. Do activity monitors increase physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(10):2078–91. source
    • cites [14] Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. Jama. 2007;298(19):2296–304. source
    • cites [21] Qiu S, Cai X, Chen X, Yang B, Sun Z. Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med. 2014;12:36. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019124126) and performed in accordance with PRISMA.

    “This systematic review, including an explorative meta-analysis, was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number: CRD42019124126) and was performed in accordance with The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement [24, 25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. source
    • cites [25] Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Physical inactivity is one of the major contributing factors for the development of chronic diseases and is highly correlated with mortality and hospitalization.

    “Physical inactivity is one of the major contributing factors for the development of chronic diseases and is highly correlated with mortality and hospitalization [4, 5].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Lee I-M, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–29. source

      The Findings and Discussion report that physical inactivity contributes to coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, breast and colon cancers, and premature mortality. The paper examines disease burden and mortality, but our copy does not report an association with hospitalization (searched: hospitalization, hospitalisation, hospital admissions). (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [5] Garcia-Aymerich J, Lange P, Benet M, Schnohr P, Antó JM. Regular physical activity reduces hospital admission and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population based cohort study. Thorax. 2006;61(9):772–8. source

      The Results and Conclusions report that, among people with COPD, lower physical activity was associated with more COPD hospital admissions and higher mortality. The paper does not establish that inactivity contributes to the development of chronic diseases generally; it studies outcomes in people who already have COPD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The NAVIGATOR study has shown that for every additional 2000 steps/day the risk of developing cardiovascular events decreased by 10%, T2DM by 5.5%, and the metabolic syndrome risk score reduced by 0.29 z-score.

    “In addition, the NAVIGATOR study, which consisted of 9000 individuals with high cardiovascular risk or impaired glucose tolerance, has shown that for every additional 2000 steps/day the risk of developing cardiovascular events decreased by 10%, T2DM by 5.5%, and the metabolic syndrome risk score redcued by 0.29 z-score [70–72].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [70] Yates T, Haffner SM, Schulte PJ, Thomas L, Huffman KM, Bales CW, et al. Association between change in daily ambulatory activity and cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance (NAVIGATOR trial): a cohort analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2014;383(9922):1059–66. source
    • cites [71] Kraus WE, Yates T, Tuomilehto J, Sun JL, Thomas L, McMurray JJV, et al. Relationship between baseline physical activity assessed by pedometer count and new-onset diabetes in the NAVIGATOR trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018;6(1):e000523. source

      The Research design and methods section reports 9,306 participants with impaired glucose tolerance and cardiovascular disease or risk factors. The Conclusions report a 5.5% lower diabetes risk per 2,000 additional baseline steps per day. This paper does not report the claimed 10% reduction in cardiovascular events or 0.29 z-score reduction in metabolic syndrome risk; its Discussion mentions a cardiovascular association without that figure. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [72] Huffman KM, Sun JL, Thomas L, Bales CW, Califf RM, Yates T, et al. Impact of baseline physical activity and diet behavior on metabolic syndrome in a pharmaceutical trial: results from NAVIGATOR. Metab Clin Exp. 2014;63(4):554–61. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dwyer et al. and Jefferis et al. both found an association between all-cause mortality and step count where every increment of 1000 steps per day led to a 6 and 14% risk reduction, respectively.

    “Here, Dwyer et al. and Jefferis et al. both found an association between all-cause mortality and step count where every increment of 1000 steps per day led to a 6 and 14% risk reduction, respectively [68, 69].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [68] Dwyer T, Pezic A, Sun C, Cochrane J, Venn A, Srikanth V, et al. Objectively measured daily steps and subsequent long term all-cause mortality: the Tasped prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0141274. source
    • cites [69] Jefferis BJ, Parsons TJ, Sartini C, Ash S, Lennon LT, Papacosta O, et al. Objectively measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and all-cause mortality in older men: does volume of activity matter more than pattern of accumulation? Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(16):1013–20. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Other meta-analyses have shown increased physical activity among outpatient adults (+2500 steps/day) and patients with T2DM (+1822-2042 steps/day).

    “These results are consistent with findings from other meta-analyses showing an increased physical activity among outpatient adults (+ 2500 steps/day) [14] and patients with T2DM (+ 1822–2042 steps/day) [21, 22].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14] Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. Jama. 2007;298(19):2296–304. source
    • cites [21] Qiu S, Cai X, Chen X, Yang B, Sun Z. Step counter use in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med. 2014;12:36. source
    • cites [22] Vaes AW, Cheung A, Atakhorrami M, Groenen MT, Amft O, Franssen FM, et al. Effect of 'activity monitor-based' counseling on physical activity and health-related outcomes in patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2013;45(5–6):397–412. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A systematic review showed a positive effect for CWATs, even when interventions were separated into CWAT-only and multifaceted interventions.

    “This is in contrast with a systematic review that showed a positive effect for CWATs, even when interventions were separated into CWAT-only and multifaceted interventions [74].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74] Brickwood KJ, Watson G, O'Brien J, Williams AD. Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2019;7(4):e11819. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Higgens et al. reported that almost one third of meta-analyses have moderate to considerable heterogeneity.

    “Moreover, Higgens et al. reported that almost one third of meta-analyses have moderate to considerable heterogeneity [85].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2003;327(7414):557–60. source

      In “How much is too much heterogeneity?” (page not given), the paper tentatively calls I² values of 50% and 75% moderate and high, and reports that about a quarter of meta-analyses had I² values over 50%. That supports the general point, but not the claim’s “almost one third” proportion. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    It has been suggested that regular physical activity may change the LDL cholesterol particle size, even when total LDL concentrations remain constant.

    “However, it has been suggested that regular physical activity may change the LDL cholesterol particle size, even when total LDL concentrations remain constant [82, 83].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [82] Halle M, Berg A, Konig D, Keul J, Baumstark MW. Differences in the concentration and composition of low-density lipoprotein subfraction particles between sedentary and trained hypercholesterolemic men. Metab Clin Exp. 1997;46(2):186–91. source
    • cites [83] Williams PT, Stefanick ML, Vranizan KM, Wood PD. The effects of weight loss by exercise or by dieting on plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels in men with low, intermediate, and normal-to-high HDL at baseline. Metab Clin Exp. 1994;43(7):917–24. source

      The Discussion and Results passages report changes in HDL cholesterol and its subfractions after exercise-induced weight loss, not changes in LDL particle size while total LDL remains constant. Searches for LDL particle size and low-density lipoprotein subfractions found only a related work listed in the References; our copy does not state the attributed claim. No page numbers were supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All included studies were unable to blind participants and study personnel/physicians (n = 18) or to adequately report blinding (n = 17).

    “All included studies were unable to blind the participants and the study personnel/physicians (n = 18) or to adequately report blinding (n = 17).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The largest risk of bias was performance bias (lack of blinding of participants and personnel) and detection bias (minimal blinding of outcome assessors).

    “The largest risk of bias was with regard to the performance bias (lack of blinding of participants and personnel) and detection bias (minimal blinding of those assessing outcomes).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among 35 included studies, 15 met five (n = 5) and four (n = 10) of six risk of bias criteria; 18 met three and two met only two.

    “Fifteen studies met five (n = 5) [37, 42, 57, 59, 65] and four (n = 10) [18, 33, 38, 41, 49, 53, 55, 58, 64, 66] of the six risk of bias criteria. Eighteen studies met three criteria [32, 34–36, 39, 40, 43–45, 47, 50–52, 56, 60–63] and two studies met only two criteria [48, 54].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall, 60% (range 13-89%) of participants were male, and one study included only male participants.

    “Overall, 60% (range: 13–89%) of the participants were male and one study included only male participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean age of participants was 61.3 ± 7.3 years (range 45.4-75.7), with two studies not providing average age.

    “Their mean age was 61.3 ± 7.3 years (range: 45.4–75.7 years) whereas two studies did not provide information of the average population age [41, 61].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Waist circumference, systolic BP, and LDL cholesterol results were homogeneous and had no significant publication bias.

    “In addition, both waist circumference (Q = 20.0, p = 0.40; I2 = 12), systolic BP (Q = 7.5, p = 0.98; I2 < 0.001) and LDL cholesterol concentration (Q = 9.0, p = 0.44; I2 < 0.001) were all homogeneous results and no significant publication bias was found.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Subgroup effects for chronic respiratory diseases, T2DM, overweight/obesity, and sedentary older adults were statistically heterogeneous.

    “as well as the results from individual subgroups including chronic respiratory diseases (Q = 75.9, p < 0.001; I2 = 97), T2DM (Q = 95.3, p < 0.001; I2 = 86), overweight/obesity (Q = 4.4, p = 0.037; I2 = 77) and sedentary older adults (Q = 58.9, p < 0.001; I2 < 82).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The pooled effect estimates from the included randomised controlled trials are valid despite the high statistical heterogeneity.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The included studies consisted of populations with chronic respiratory diseases (n = 7), impaired glucose tolerance or T2DM (n = 12), CVD (n = 6), overweight/obesity (n = 3), cognitive disorders (n = 1) and sedentary older adults (n = 6).

    “The included studies consisted of populations with various chronic diseases including chronic respiratory diseases (n = 7) [32–38], impaired glucose tolerance or T2DM (n = 12) [39–50], CVD (n = 6) [51–56], overweight/obesity (n = 3) [57–59], cognitive disorders (n = 1) [60] and sedentary older adults (n = 6) [61–65].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Control conditions varied and consisted of usual care (n = 21), maintaining normal physical activity levels (n = 7), encouragement to increase daily physical activity (n = 2), generic information brochures (n = 1), education sessions (n = 2), coaching sessions (n = 1) and one control group wore masked CWAT devices (n = 1).

    “Control conditions varied between studies and consisted of usual care (n = 21) [32, 34–36, 38, 41–43, 46–50, 52–56, 58, 59, 61], maintaining normal physical activity levels (n = 7) [39, 57, 62–66], encouragement to increase daily physical activity (n = 2) [37, 40], generic information brochures (n = 1) [51], education sessions (n = 2) [33, 44], coaching sessions (n = 1) [45] and one control group”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The average dropout rate among studies was 17% (range 0-43%), with four studies having 100% completion.

    “Furthermore, the average dropout rate among the studies was 17% (range: 0–43%) of which four studies had a 100% participants completion rate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most studies provided complete outcome data (n = 31), three had high risk of attrition bias due to incomplete outcome data, and one reported insufficient information.

    “Most of the studies provided complete outcome data (n = 31), whereas three studies had a high risk of attrition bias [38, 54, 60] due to incomplete outcome data and only one study reported insufficient information [48].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only eight studies blinded outcome assessors, whereas the majority did not adequately report blinding of outcome assessors (n = 22).

    “Only eight studies blinded the outcome assessors, whereas the majority of the studies did not adequately report blinding of the outcome assessors (n = 22).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Twenty-five studies reported daily step counts, and most participants in intervention (5105 ± 2591 steps/day; range 2031-9003) and control (5149 ± 2751 steps/day; range 2334-7539) groups were relatively physically inactive at baseline.

    “Twenty-five studies reported daily step counts and most of the participants in the intervention (5105 ± 2591 steps/day; range: 2031–9003 steps/day) and control (5149 ± 2751 steps/day; range: 2334–7539 steps/day) groups were relatively physically inactive at baseline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Thirty-five full-text articles fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in qualitative (n = 35) and quantitative (n = 33) synthesis.

    “Thirty-five full-text articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in qualitative (n = 35) and quantitative (n = 33) synthesis (Table 1.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The CWAT-based interventions varied in duration (mean ± SD 22 ± 17 weeks; range 6-64 weeks).

    “The CWAT-based interventions evaluated in the included studies varied considerably in intervention duration (mean ± SD; 22 ± 17 weeks; range: 6–64 weeks).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority of interventions consisted of CWAT use and individual counselling (n = 22), of which five also used additional telephone calls.

    “The majority of the interventions consisted of CWAT use and individual counselling (n = 22) of which five interventions also used additional telephone calls [48, 51, 59–61].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Significant publication bias was found in subgroup analyses for patients with CVD (p = 0.012), overweight/obesity (p = 0.037), and sedentary older adults (p = 0.004).

    “In addition, significant publication bias was found in subgroup analyses for patients with CVD (p = 0.012), overweight/obesity (p = 0.037) and sedentary older adults (p = 0.004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The included studies evaluated a total of 2858 participants (intervention n = 1567; control n = 1291), including 529 with chronic respiratory diseases (492 COPD), 704 with T2DM, 571 with CVD, 334 with overweight/obesity, 21 with Alzheimer's disease and 699 sedentary older adults.

    “The included studies evaluated a total of 2858 participants (intervention: n = 1567; control: n = 1291) of which 529 participants with chronic respiratory diseases (492 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD), 704 participants with T2DM, 571 participants with CVD, 334 participants with overweight/obesity, 21 participants with Alzheimer’s disease and 699 sedentary older adults.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Data were independently extracted by two reviewers using a predesigned data collection form adapted from the Cochrane Collaboration.

    “Data were independently extracted by two of the reviewers (W.M.A.F. and J.S.). Data extraction was performed with the aid of a predesigned data collection form, adapted from the extraction form of the Cochrane Collaboration (Appendix II).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Studies were independently screened in three steps by two authors, with disagreements resolved by consensus with a third reviewer.

    “Studies were independently screened in three different steps by two authors (W.M.A.F. and J.S.).”
    • Also stated in: § Study selection · plain
      “Disagreements between authors were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer (B.O.E).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    CWAT-based interventions increase physical activity and have beneficial effects on systolic blood pressure, waist circumference and LDL cholesterol concentration in patients with chronic diseases.

    “CWAT-based interventions increase physical activity and have beneficial effects on important health-related outcomes such as systolic blood pressure, waist circumference and LDL cholesterol concentration in patients with chronic diseases.”
    • Also stated in: § Summary box · plain
      “Consumer wearable activity tracker-based interventions increase physical activity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Goal setting may be a key motivational factor for increasing physical activity, but this conclusion was based on observational studies and healthy individuals.

    “In addition, although Bravata et al. showed that goal setting may be a key motivational factor for increasing physical activity, this conclusion was based on observational studies and healthy individuals [14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. Jama. 2007;298(19):2296–304. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, covering sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other threats to validity.

    “The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by one reviewer (W.M.A.F.) as recommended by Higgins et al. (Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias’ assessment tool, the Cochrane Collaboration). Here, the following methodological criteria were assessed: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.2; 2017.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity and robustness of results.

    “Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity of the studies and to evaluate the robustness of the results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The increase in step count from 5100 to 7200 steps/day could indicate a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality risk and the development of chronic diseases.

    “Consequently and in accordance with Lee et al., who obeserved that hazard ratios of all-cause mortality declined progressively with higher mean steps per day until approximately 7500 steps/day after which they leveled in older adult women [73], this could indicate a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality risk and the development of chronic diseases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73] Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Kamada M. Bassett DR. Buring JE. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women. JAMA internal medicine: Matthews CE; 2019.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    These studies all confirm that a CWAT-only, or included in a multi-component intervention, have a positive effect in favor of the intervention groups.

    “These studies all confirm that a CWAT-only, or included in a multi-component intervention, have a positive effect in favor of the interventions groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and the Egger test.

    “Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and the Egger test (Appendix III).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    CWAT-based interventions increase physical activity and improve cardiometabolic health (waist circumference, systolic BP, LDL cholesterol) in populations with chronic diseases.

    “In general, individuals with a CWAT increased their physical activity level and this may be associated with improvements in cardiometabolic health including waist circumference, systolic BP and LDL cholesterol concentration.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusion · hedged
      “These results suggest that populations with chronic diseases significantly increase physical activity using CWATs only, or as part of a multi-component intervention, and improve their cardiometabolic health such as a reduced waist circumference, systolic BP and LDL cholesterol concentration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in waist circumference, systolic BP, and LDL cholesterol are attributable to the CWAT-based interventions rather than other factors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis from The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration showed that with the aid of statins the 5-year incidence of major vascular events reduced by about 20% and all-cause mortality by 12% per 40 mg/dl in LDL cholesterol concentration.

    “A meta-analysis from The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration showed that with the aid of statins the 5-year incidence of major vascular events reduced by about 20% and all-cause mortality by 12% per 40 mg/dl in LDL cholesterol concentration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A change of −10 mm Hg in systolic BP reduces the risk of developing CVD by 17% and overall mortality by 13%.

    “It has been shown that a change of − 10 mm Hg in systolic BP reduces the risk of developing CVD by 17% and overall mortality by 13% [77].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [77] Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2016;387(10022):957–67. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The use of CWAT devices as both measurement and motivational instrument may affect the control group by increasing their physical activity by the thought that they were being monitored.

    “As a result, this may affect the control group by increasing their physical activity by the thought that they were being monitored.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our findings are relevant for the general population and for those who cannot participate in high-intensity physical activities.

    “As such, our findings are relevant for the general population and for those who cannot participate in high-intensity physical activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A decrease in systolic BP of 2 mm Hg is associated with a reduction of 10% in stroke mortality and a 7% reduction in mortality originating from CVD.

    “In addition, a decrease in systolic BP of 2 mm Hg is associated with a reduction of 10% in stroke mortality and a 7% reduction in mortality originating from CVD [78].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet (London, England). 2002;360(9349):1903–13. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All studies only measured physical activity but did not take into account sedentary time.

    “Finally, all studies only measured physical activity but did not take into account sedentary time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    No direct associations between increased physical activities (steps/day) and cardiometabolic risk factors could be made and no minimal amount of steps per day to improve cardiometabolic health could be determined.

    “In this way, no direct associations between increased physical acitivities (steps/day) and cardiometabolic risk factors could be made and no minimal amount of steps per day to improve cardiometabolic health could be determined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Patient characteristics were all independently associated with an increased number of steps, which possibly explains the heterogeneity of the overall effect and subgroup analyses.

    “Furthermore, patient characteristics were all independently associated with an increased number of step, which possibly explains the heterogeneity of the overall effect and subgroup analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lower increase in physical activity in COPD and CVD patients might be due to airflow and cardiac limitations and most of these studies were performed after a rehabilitation period where baseline physical activity levels were reduced.

    “This might be due to airflow and cardiac limitations and most of these studies were performed after a rehabilitation period where baseline physical activity levels were reduced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Clinical and methodological diversity is always present in meta-analysis and statistical heterogeneity is inevitable.

    “However, since clinical and methodological diversity is always present in meta-analysis statistical heterogeneity is inevitable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The obese population was younger of age compared to other populations and, as a result, probably showed a higher increase in physical activity.

    “For example, the obese population was younger of age compared to other populations and, as a result, propably showed a higher increase in physical activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The included studies had relatively small sample sizes and different intervention durations.

    “First, studies with relatively small sample sizes and different intervention durations were included in the meta-analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    CWATs can be effective on their own, but when combined with other behaviour change strategies, such as telephone support or group-based counselling, the improvement in physical activity is greater.

    “This suggests that CWATs can be effective on their own, but when combined with other behaviour change strategies, such as telephone support or group-based counselling, the improvement in physical activity is greater.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
53 of 53
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Very poor long-term compliance to adequate physical activity and a healthy lifestyle is one of the main factors explaining why many people remain physically inactive despite recommendations.

    “Here, very poor long-term compliance to adequate physical activity and a healthy lifestyle appears to be one of the main factors explaining this discrepancy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Consumer wearable activity trackers accurately measure physical activity (steps/day) in the studied populations.

    “objectively measured physical activity (number of steps per day)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The observed improvements in waist circumference, systolic BP, and LDL cholesterol are attributable to the CWAT-based interventions rather than other factors.

    “no direct associations between increased physical acitivities (steps/day) and cardiometabolic risk factors could be made”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pooled effect estimates from the included randomised controlled trials are valid despite the high statistical heterogeneity.

    “since clinical and methodological diversity is always present in meta-analysis statistical heterogeneity is inevitable”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benefits for blood pressure were reported in people with type 2 diabetes (systolic SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.01) and populations with mixed disease (systolic mean difference -3.79 mmHg, 95% CI -4.54 to -3.04).

    “Specifically, benefits for blood pressure were reported in people with type 2 diabetes 68 (systolic SMD -0•18, 95% CI -0•34 to -0•01; figure 2) and populations with mixed disease (which included diabetes, COPD, cardio vascular disease, overweight or obesity, and Alzheimer's disease; systolic mean difference -3•79 mmHg, 95% CI -4•54 to -3•04; appendix p 31), 42”

    From Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results table reports a systolic blood-pressure mean difference of −3.79 mmHg across the included populations, with a 95% CI of −4.53 to −3.04 mmHg. The citing sentence gives the lower bound as −4.54, a 0.01 mmHg discrepancy. Its type 2 diabetes SMD is attached to citation 68, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Benefits for LDL cholesterol were reported in populations of mixed disease (mean difference -0.32 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.12).

    “benefits for LDL cholesterol in populations of mixed disease (mean difference -0•32 mmol/L, 95% CI -0•51 to -0•12; appendix p 32), 42”

    From Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results (Physical activity and cardiometabolic health; page unavailable) report a significant LDL-cholesterol reduction in participants with chronic diseases. However, the reported mean difference is −5.70 mg/dL (95% CI −9.24 to −2.15), approximately −0.15 mmol/L (95% CI −0.24 to −0.06), not the claimed −0.32 mmol/L (95% CI −0.51 to −0.12). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Vogel intervention workload change is miscalculated

    Minor

    Peak workload rose from 185 W to 192 W, an increase of 7 W, not the reported 27 W.

    Reported 27 · recomputed 7

  • Armit age-group counts exceed its participant count

    Minor

    The two age groups listed for Armit total 136 people, while its sex counts and intervention and control arms each total 91.

  • Reported male-percentage range excludes an all-male study

    Minor

    A study with only male participants has 100% male participants, outside the stated range of 13-89%.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2003;327(7414):557–60. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franssen, W. M. A., Franssen, G. H. L. M., Spaas, J., Solmi, F., & Eijnde, B. O.
Affiliations
  • Hasselt University (BE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Franssen, Wouter M. A.
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2020-05-11
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
57-57
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025463389
Cited by
188
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
physical activity promotion, cardiometabolic health, chronic disease, behaviour change interventions, step count, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, LDL cholesterol, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, sedentary older adults, overweight and obesity, cognitive disorders
MeSH terms
Fitness Trackers, Aged, Blood Pressure, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review