Cited by 11Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDisability Education and EmploymentOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Predicting Occupational Outcomes for Individuals with ADHD: The Role of Hyperactivity/Impulsivity and Executive Functioning

Open access
Chan, Elizabeth S. M., Langberg, Joshua M.·2026·Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose: The present study adds to the literature by evaluating the differential risk of ADHD symptom dimensions and executive functioning (EF; time management, organization, motivation) to key occupational outcomes. Methods: Participants were adults ( N = 100; 51% male) with ADHD working full-time between the ages of 19–30 ( M = 26.61, SD = 2.28). Participants reported on their ADHD symptoms and EF as well as on five areas of occupational functioning (income, written warnings, boredom at work, satisfaction with coworkers and supervisors). Results: Over and above medication status, sex, and age, path analyses revealed hyperactivity/impulsivity and time management were the most consistent predictors of outcomes. Higher levels of each predictor were associated with lower income, more written warnings, greater boredom at work, as well as lower satisfaction with coworkers and supervisors. Executive function difficulties with organization and motivation were risk factors for all evaluated outcomes, except written warnings. Higher levels of inattention symptoms were associated with more written warnings and lower satisfaction with coworkers. Conclusion: The present study is one of the first to document the differential risks of ADHD symptoms and EF to a comprehensive set of occupational functioning outcomes. Future research is needed to replicate the present findings and expand this line of work to identify factors that may protect against these ADHD-related risks on workplace success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10926-024-10259-y

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults exhibiting multiple executive function impairments often report greater academic and occupational difficulties.

    “adults exhibiting multiple EF impairments often report greater academic and occupational difficulties [93,97]”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Discussion reports that time-management, organization, and motivation deficits predict occupational difficulties in adults with ADHD. It does not report academic outcomes in these adults or show that having multiple impairments together predicts greater difficulty; the claim also omits the ADHD population qualifier. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Workplace studies show that impairments in time management and self-organization mediate the link between ADHD symptoms and job burnout, suggesting executive dysfunction operates as a proximal driver of occupational underperformance.

    “These patterns are empirically supported: workplace studies show that impairments in time management and self-organization mediate the link between ADHD symptoms and job burnout, suggesting that executive dysfunction operates as a proximal driver of occupational underperformance [10,97,198].”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Results (Aim 2; page not provided) associate time-management and organizational difficulties with several occupational outcomes. They do not assess job burnout or show that these difficulties mediate a link between ADHD symptoms and burnout; the Conclusion instead calls for future research on mediators. The claim therefore overstates an association as an established pathway. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Emotional impulsivity and low frustration tolerance can precipitate interpersonal conflict, while inattention may be misinterpreted as disinterest or irresponsibility.

    “Emotional impulsivity and low frustration tolerance can precipitate interpersonal conflict, while inattention may be misinterpreted as disinterest or irresponsibility [10,97,198].”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Introduction (‘ADHD and Relationships at Work’; page not provided) says hyperactivity/impulsivity may reduce positive workplace interactions and that inattention may lead to less favorable supervisor perceptions. The Discussion also links impulsive behavior to poorer peer relationships. The copy does not specifically identify emotional impulsivity or low frustration tolerance as causes of conflict, or say that inattention is mistaken for disinterest or irresponsibility. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [27]Harris JL. The experience of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the workplace [Doctoral dissertation]: Walden University; 2020
  2. [30]Barkley RA. Barkley adult ADHD rating scale-iv (BAARS-IV). Guilford Press; 2011.
  3. [43]Jolley JH. Understanding the needs of neurodiverse employees in the workplace [Doctoral dissertation]: Northcentral University; 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, E. S. M., & Langberg, J. M.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Chan, Elizabeth S. M.
Venue
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2024-12-12
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
223-233
ISSN
  • 1053-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3688
OpenAlex
W4405314506
Cited by
11
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperactivity/impulsivity, executive function, occupational functioning, adult ADHD, time management, organizations, motivation, inattention, income, job boredom, workplace success
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Boredom, Employment, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Job Satisfaction, Male, Motivation, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review