Cited by 61Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The Veggie Project: A Case Study of a Multi-component Farmers’ Market Intervention

Freedman, Darcy A., Bell, Bethany A., Collins, Leslie V.·2011·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

This case study provides an in-depth examination of process and feasibility factors associated with the development of a multi-component environmental intervention designed to increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables in four low-income, minority, urban communities with few healthy food retail outlets. The intervention, the Veggie Project, included three components: (a) onsite farmers' markets, (b) a Super Shopper voucher program, and (c) a Youth Leader Board. We analyzed receipts from sales transactions at the farmers' markets, close-ended surveys with participants, in-depth interviews with project stakeholders, and journal entries completed by youth participants. Thirty-four farmers' markets occurred, resulting in 1,101 sales transactions. Financial vouchers were used to purchased 63% of the produce. All of the youth Super Shoppers came to the market at least once and made significantly more purchase transactions than adults. The farmers' markets were never accessed by 38% of the adult Super Shoppers. The Veggie Project increased access to healthy foods, particularly among youth. More research is warranted to examine the relationship between market use and dietary behaviors as well as other factors (i.e., besides physical and economic) influencing food access among adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-011-0245-9

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small, uncontrolled community intervention found implementation of summer farmers' markets with vouchers and direct youth participation and education led to positive attitudes toward such markets as a learning opportunity and exposure to fresh foods for children.

    “A small, uncontrolled community intervention found that implementation of summer farmers’ markets that included vouchers to community members and direct youth participation and education led to positive attitudes toward such markets as both a learning opportunity and exposure to fresh foods for children.321”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freedman, D. A., Bell, B. A., & Collins, L. V.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Freedman, Darcy A.
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2011-07-30
Volume
32
Issue
3-4
Pages
213-224
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W2020451297
Cited by
61
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
farmers' markets, food deserts, low-income minority communities, urban communities, food vouchers, environmental interventions, dietary behavior, intervention feasibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Agriculture, Analysis of Variance, Black or African American, Feasibility Studies, Female, Food Supply, Fruit, Health Education, Health Promotion, Health Surveys, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Nutritional Status, Obesity, Poverty, Primary Prevention, Social Identification, Socioeconomic Factors, Tennessee, United States, Vegetables, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Organizational Case Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review