Cited by 42Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Personalized feedback as a universal prevention approach for college drinking: a randomized trial of an e-mail linked universal web-based alcohol intervention

Open access
Palfai, Tibor P., Winter, Michael, Lu, John, Rosenbloom, David, Saitz, Richard·2014·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

Alcohol use among first-year university students continues to be a central health concern. Efforts to address drinking in this population have increasingly relied on web-based interventions, which have the capacity to reach large numbers of students through a convenient and highly utilized medium. Despite evidence for the utility of this approach for reducing hazardous drinking, recent studies that have examined the effectiveness of this approach as a universal prevention strategy in campus-wide studies have produced mixed results. We sought to test the effectiveness of a web-based alcohol intervention as a universal prevention strategy for first-year students. An e-mail invitation linked to a brief, web-based survey on health behaviors was sent to all first-year students during the fall semester. Those who completed the baseline assessment were randomized to receive either a feedback-based alcohol intervention (intervention condition) or feedback about other health-related behaviors such as sleep and nutrition (control condition). A second web-based survey was used to collect follow-up drinking data 5 months later. The number of heavy drinking episodes in the previous month and alcohol-related consequences in the previous 3 months served as the primary dependent variables. Negative binomial regression analyses did not indicate a significant effect of the intervention at follow-up on either heavy drinking episodes or alcohol-related consequences. Analyses of additional drinking outcomes among the subsample of students who reported that they did not drink at baseline showed that those who received the alcohol intervention were subsequently less likely to drink alcohol. These results suggest that web-based alcohol interventions may be a potentially useful method of maintaining abstinence among underage, non-drinking students. Overall, however, results indicate that an e-mail-linked, campus-wide, web-intervention approach to address alcohol use among first-year students may have limited effectiveness as an approach to minimize hazardous drinking over the course of the year.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-013-0337-9

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalized feedback interventions are closer to secondary prevention than pure psychological intervention to reduce or eliminate an undesirable behavior.

    “Personalized feedback interventions are closer to secondary prevention than pure psychological intervention to reduce or eliminate an undesirable behavior (Hopper, 2008; Palfai et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 2007 Helping patients who drink too much: a clinician’s guide: Updated 2005 Edition Bethesda, MD National Institutes of Health

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palfai, T. P., Winter, M., Lu, J., Rosenbloom, D., & Saitz, R.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Palfai, Tibor P.
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2014-01-14
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
75-84
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W1976659108
Cited by
42
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P60AA013759)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
college drinking, universal prevention, personalized feedback, first-year college students, alcohol-related consequences, abstinence maintenance
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Risk-Taking, Students, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior, Internet, Feedback, Psychological, Electronic Mail, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review