Cited by 157Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsBehavioral Health and Interventions

The feasibility and effectiveness of a web-based personalised feedback and social norms alcohol intervention in UK university students: A randomised control trial

Bewick, Bridgette M., Trusler, Karen, Mulhern, Brendan, Barkham, Michael, Hill, Andrew J.·2008·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Objective Alcohol misuse amongst University students is a serious concern, and research has started to investigate the feasibility of using e-health interventions. This study aimed to establish the effectiveness of an electronic web-based personalised feedback intervention through the use of a randomised control trial (RCT).Methods 506 participants were stratified by gender, age group, year of study, self-reported weekly consumption of alcohol and randomly assigned to either a control or intervention condition. Intervention participants received electronic personalised feedback and social norms information on their drinking behaviour which they could access by logging onto the website at any time during the 12-week period. CAGE score, average number of alcoholic drinks consumed per drinking occasion, and alcohol consumption over the last week were collected from participants at pre- and post-survey.Results A significant difference in pre- to post-survey mean difference of alcohol consumed per occasion was found, with those in the intervention condition displaying a larger mean decrease when compared to controls. No intervention effect was found for units of alcohol consumed per week or for CAGE scores. Sixty-three percent of intervention participants agreed that the feedback provided was useful. Those intervention participants who were above the CAGE cut off were more likely to report that the website would make them think more about the amount they drank.Conclusions Delivering an electronic personalised feedback intervention to students via the World Wide Web is a feasible and potentially effective method of reducing student alcohol intake. Further research is needed to replicate this outcome, evaluate maintenance of any changes, and investigate the process of interaction with web-based interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.05.002

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kypri, K, & Cunningham, J.A. (in press). Self-help interventions for problem drinking.
  2. Wechsler, H., Lee, J.E., Nelson, T., & Kuo, M. (2002). Underage college students drinking behaviour, Access to alcohol, and the influence of deterrence policies. Journal of American College Health, 50(5), 223-236.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bewick, B. M., Trusler, K., Mulhern, B., Barkham, M., & Hill, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Bewick, Bridgette M.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1192-1198
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049658617
Cited by
157
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
alcohol abuse, university students, online intervention, personalized feedback, social norms, e-health, alcohol consumption, CAGE screening, drinking behavior, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Feasibility Studies, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Students, Universities, Program Evaluation, Sex Distribution, Internet, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review