Cited by 15Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Schemas Mediate the Link Between Procrastination and Depression: Results from the United States and Pakistan

Open access
Aftab, Sobia, Klibert, Jeffrey, Holtzman, Nicholas, Qadeer, Kanwal, Aftab, Saima·2017·Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The current study extended the Procrastination-Health model by examining a multiple mediation model, with two cognitive schemas (defectiveness; insufficient self-control) serving as mediators. The models were as follows: procrastination defectiveness depression; procrastination insufficient self-control depression. Participants included 412 (271 women, 141 men) United States (U.S.) and 240 (107 women, 133 men) Pakistani college students, who responded via self-report questionnaires. In the U.S. sample, results revealed a non-significant direct effect between procrastination and depression after consideration for the two cognitive schemas, suggesting the schemas completely mediated the model. Both defectiveness and insufficient self-control schemas were significant individual mediators. In the Pakistani model, results revealed a significant direct effect and indirect effect through the two cognitive schemas, indicating partial mediation. Only the indirect path through defectiveness schemas was significant in the Pakistani model. Given slight differences in the two models, a moderated-mediation model was analyzed to determine if the strength of the direct and indirect effects varied by nationality. The strength of the direct and indirect effects was not moderated by nationality. Overall, this is the first study to identify cognitive mediators in the procrastination-depression relationship. Such findings represent a significant extension of the Procrastination-Health model and offer some unique cognitive insights into culturally sensitive conceptualizations and treatments for depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10942-017-0263-5

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aftab, S., Klibert, J., Holtzman, N., Qadeer, K., & Aftab, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Karachi (PK)
  • Georgia Southern University (US)
Corresponding author
Klibert, Jeffrey
Venue
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Published
2017-01-12
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
329-345
ISSN
  • 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6563
OpenAlex
W2578558822
Cited by
15
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
procrastination, depression, cognitive schemas, mediation, moderated mediation, cross-cultural comparison, university students, United States, Pakistan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review