Cited by 39Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Chronic Pain and Praying to a Higher Power: Useful or Useless?

Andersson, Gerhard·2008·Journal of Religion and Health

Abstract

In the present study a Swedish sample of 118 persons with chronic pain completed online tests on two occasions in association with treatment trials. A three item subscale measuring praying as a coping strategy was derived from the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), but adapted to refer to "a higher power" instead of "God". Measures of pain and anxiety/depression were also included. Results revealed significant associations between praying and pain interference and impairment. Praying was also associated with anxiety and depression scores. Results also showed that prayer predicted depression scores at follow-up, and that follow-up prayer was predicted by pain interference at first measurement occasion. Overall, if prayer had any relation with the other variables it was in the negative direction of more distress being associated with more praying both concurrently and prospectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10943-007-9148-8

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 18 best studies, nine (50%) reported inverse relationships (less pain among the more R/S or reduced pain in response to an R/S intervention).

    “Of the 18 best studies, nine (50%) reported inverse relationships (less pain among the more R/S [534] or reduced pain in response to a R/S intervention [535–542]), while three (20%) reported positive relationships (worse pain in the more R/S) [543–545].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersson, G.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Andersson, Gerhard
Venue
Journal of Religion and Health
Published
2007-09-15
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
176-187
ISSN
  • 0022-4197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6571
OpenAlex
W2070631377
Cited by
39
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Religion and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
prayer, chronic pain, coping strategies, pain interference, pain-related impairment, anxiety, depression, religious coping, Coping Strategies Questionnaire, higher power
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review