Cited by 545Educational Games and GamificationScience Education and PedagogyDigital Games and Media

Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds

Steinkuehler, Constance, Duncan, Sean·2008·Journal of Science Education and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Duncan, Sean
Venue
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Published
2008-09-03
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
530-543
ISSN
  • 1059-0145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1839
OpenAlex
W2003276670
Cited by
545
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 39
FWCI
39.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Science Education and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
scientific habits of mind, virtual worlds, massively multiplayer online games, World of Warcraft, online forums, game-based learning, informal learning, scientific literacy, social construction of knowledge, model-based reasoning, dispositions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review