Cited by 169Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting YouthMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Inflexible parents, inflexible kids: a 6-year longitudinal study of parenting style and the development of psychological flexibility in adolescents

Williams, Kathryn E., Ciarrochi, Joseph, Heaven, Patrick C. L.·2012·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Parenting behaviors have been linked to children's self regulation, but it is less clear how they relate to adolescent psychological flexibility. Psychological flexibility is a broad construct that describes an individual's ability to respond appropriately to environmental demands and internal experiences in the service of their goals. We examined the longitudinal relationships between perceived parenting style and psychological flexibility among students at five Australian schools (N= 749) over 6 years, beginning in Grade 7 (50.3% female, mean age 12.39 years). Parenting style was measured in Grades 7 and 12, and psychological flexibility from Grade 9 through 12. Psychological flexibility decreased, on average, with age. Multi-level modelling indicated that authoritarian parenting (low warmth, high control) in Grade 7 predicted later (low) psychological flexibility. Moreover, increases in authoritarian parenting and decreases in authoritative parenting (high warmth and control) were associated with adolescent psychological flexibility across the high school years. Change in parenting predicted future psychological flexibility but did not predict change over time. Structural Equation Modelling revealed that adolescent psychological flexibility in Grade 9 predicted later decreases in authoritarian and increases in authoritative parenting. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding how parenting changes and the consequences of such change for the development of psychological flexibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-012-9744-0

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, K. E., Ciarrochi, J., & Heaven, P. C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Williams, Kathryn E.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2012-02-07
Volume
41
Issue
8
Pages
1053-1066
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2038380281
Cited by
169
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
parenting styles, psychological flexibility, authoritarian parenting, authoritative parenting, adolescent development, self-regulation, longitudinal development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Australia, Authoritarianism, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Permissiveness, Personality Development, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Parenting, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review