CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional connectivity of lynx at their southern range periphery in Ontario, Canada

Walpole, Aaron A., Bowman, Jeff, Murray, Dennis L., Wilson, Paul J.·2012·Landscape Ecology
DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9728-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-012-9728-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Omnidirectional or wall-to-wall approaches avoid the need to arbitrarily define and delineate discrete areas to connect, revealing important areas for connectivity over continuous landscape gradients.

    “‘Omnidirectional’ or ‘wall-to-wall’ approaches (e.g., Walpole et al. 2012; Koen et al. 2014; Pelletier et al. 2014; Anderson et al. 2016; McRae et al. 2016; Supporting Information) avoid the need to arbitrarily define and delineate discrete areas to connect (e.g., habitat cores or patches), revealing important areas for connectivity over continuous landscape gradients.”

    From Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation (2019) · cites this paper as Walpole et al. 2012

  • Cushman, McKelvey & Schwartz (2009) and Walpole et al. (2012) also placed nodes around the perimeter of the study area.

    “Cushman, McKelvey & Schwartz (2009) and Walpole et al. (2012) also placed nodes around the perimeter of the study area.”

    From Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps (2014) · cites this paper as Walpole et al. (2012)

  • A number of studies have pursued 'wall-to-wall' or 'omnidirectional' applications of Circuitscape.

    “To find additional efficiency in computation time, and also address other modeling goals or bias issues, a number of studies have pursued 'wall-to-wall' or 'omnidirectional' applications of Circuitscape ( [47,50,73,178,179]).”

    From Circuitscape in julia: empowering dynamic approaches to connectivity assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [73]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baldwin DJB, Desloges JR, Band LE (2000) Physical Geography of Ontario. In: Perera A, Euler D, Thompson I (eds) Ecology of a managed terrestrial landscape: patterns and processes of forest landscapes in Ontario. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 12–28
  3. Bayne EM, Boutin S, Moses RA (2008) Ecological factors influencing the spatial pattern of Canada lynx relative to its southern range edge in Alberta, Canada. Can J Zool 86:1189–1197. doi: 10.1139/Z08-099 · DOI
  4. Beier P, Majka DR, Spencer WD (2008) Forks in the road: choices and procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conserv Biol 22(4):836–851. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Binzenhöfer B, Biedermann R, Settele J, Schröder B (2008) Connectivity compensates for low habitat quality and small patch size in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Ecol Res 23:259–269. doi: 10.1007/s11284-007-0376-x · DOI
  6. Burdett CL, Moen RA, Niemi GJ, Mech D (2007) Defining space use and movements of Canada lynx with global positioning system telemetry. J Mammal 88(2):457–467. doi: 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-181R.1 · DOI
  7. Buskirk SW, Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Pearson DE, Squires JR, McKelvey KS (2000) Comparative ecology of lynx in North America. In: Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Buskirk SW, Koehler GM, Krebs CJ, McKelvey KS, Squires JR (eds) Ecology and conservation of lynx in the United States. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, pp 397–417
  8. Carroll C, Noss RF, Paquet PC (2001) Carnivores as focal species for conservation planning in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecol Appl 11:961–980. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0961:CAFSFC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  9. Chetkiewicz CB, Boyce MS (2009) Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors. J Appl Ecol 46:1036–1047. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01686.x · DOI
  10. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Schwartz MK (2009) Use of empirically derived source-destination models to map regional conservation corridors. Conserv Biol 23(2):368–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01111.x · DOI
  11. Doyle PG, Snell JL (1984) Random walks and electric networks. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DM (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x · DOI
  13. Fuller AK, Harrison DJ, Vashon JH (2007) Winter habitat selection by Canada lynx in Maine: prey abundance or accessibility? J Wildl Manag 71(6):1980–1986. doi: 10.2193/2006-288 · DOI
  14. Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, Beard KH (2010) A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv Biol 24(3):660–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01450.x · DOI
  15. Guo Q, Taper M, Schoenberger M, Brandle J (2005) Spatial-temporal population dynamics across species range: from centre to margin. Oikos 108:47–57. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13149.x · DOI
  16. Haddad NM, Tewksbury JT (2005) Low quality habitat corridors as movement conduits for two butterfly species. Ecol Appl 15(1):250–257. doi: 10.1890/03-5327 · DOI
  17. Hoegh-Guldberg O (1999) Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs. Mar Freshw Res 50:839–866. doi: 10.1071/MF99078 · DOI
  18. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2n edn. Wiley, New York, p 307 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hoving CL, Harrison DJ, Krohn WB, Jakubas WJ, McCollough MA (2004) Canada lynx Lynx canadensis habitat and forest succession in northern Maine, USA. Wildl Biol 10(4):285–294 · DOI
  20. Hoving CL, Harrison DL, Krohn WB, Joseph RA, O’Brien M (2005) Broad-scale predictors of Canada lynx occurrence in eastern North America. J Wildl Manag 69(2):739–751. doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0739:BPOCLO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  21. Kendall WL (1999) Robustness of closed capture-recapture methods to violations of the closure assumption. Ecology 80(8):2517–2525. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2517:ROCCRM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  22. Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1995) When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv Biol 9(4):753–760. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040753.x · DOI
  23. Mackenzie DI (2005) What are the issues with presence-absence data for wildlife managers? J Wildl Manag 69(3):849–860. doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0849:WATIWP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  24. Mackenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle A, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83(8):2248–2225. doi: 10.2307/3072056 · DOI
  25. Maxie AJ, Hussey KF, Lowe SJ, Middel KR, Pond BA, Obbard ME, Patterson BR (2010) A comparison of forest resource inventory, provincial land cover maps and field surveys for wildlife habitat analysis in the Great Lakes—St Lawrence forest. For Chron 86(1):77–86 · DOI
  26. Mowat G, Poole KG, O’Donoghue M (2000) Ecology of lynx in northern Canada and Alaska. In: Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Buskirk SW, Koehler GM, Krebs CJ, McKelvey KS, Squires JR (eds) Ecology and conservation of lynx in the United States. University Press of Colorado, Denver, pp 265–306
  27. Murray DL (2003) Snowshoe hare and other hares. In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson B (eds) Wild mammals of North America, vol II. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 147–175
  28. Murray DL, Boutin S (1991) The influence of snow on lynx and coyote movements: does morphology affect behaviour? Oecologia 88:463–469 · DOI
  29. Murray DL, Boutin S, O’Donoghue M (1994) Winter habitat selection by lynx and coyotes in relation to snowshoe hare abundance. Can J Zool 72:1444–1451. doi: 10.1139/z94-191 · DOI
  30. Murray DL, Steury TD, Roth JD (2008) Assessment of Canada lynx research and conservation needs in the southern range: another kick at the cat. J Wildl Manag 72(7):1463–1472. doi: 10.2193/2007-389 · DOI
  31. O’Donoghue M, Slough BG, Poole KG, Boutin S, Hofer EJ, Mowat G, Krebs CJ (2010) Cyclical dynamics and behaviour of Canada lynx in northern Canada. In: MacDonald DW, Loveridge AJ (eds) Biology and conservation of wild felids. Oxford University Press, Toronto, pp 521–536
  32. Parker GR, Maxwell JW, Morton LD, Smith GEJ (1983) The ecology of the lynx (Lynx canadensis) on Cape Breton Island. Can J Zool 61(4):770–786. doi: 10.1139/z83-102 · DOI
  33. Poole K (2003) A review of the Canada lynx, Lynx canadensis, in Canada. Can Field Nat 117(3):360–376 · DOI
  34. Rayfield B, Fortin M-J, Fall A (2010) The sensitivity of least cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landscape Ecol 25(4):519–532. doi: 10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Richards SA (2008) Dealing with overdispersed count data in applied ecology. J Appl Ecol 45:218–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01377.x · DOI
  36. Rota CT, Fletcher RJ Jr, Dorazio RM, Betts MG (2009) Occupancy estimation and the closure assumption. J Appl Ecol 46:1173–1181. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01734.x · DOI
  37. Schwartz MK, Mills LS, McKelvey KS, Ruggiero LF, Allendorf FW (2002) DNA reveals high dispersal synchronizing the population dynamics of Canada lynx. Nature 415:520–522. doi: 10.1038/415520a · DOI
  38. Shah VB, McRae B (2008) Circuitscape: a tool for landscape ecology. In: Proceedings of the 7th python in science conference (SciPy 2008), pp 62–66
  39. Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin M-J, McRae BH, Scribner K (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 19:3576–3591. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04657.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape struture. Oikos 68(3):571–573. doi: 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Thompson ID (2000) Forest vegetation of Ontario: factors influencing landscape change. In: Perera A, Euler D, Thompson ID (eds) Ecology of a managed terrestrial landscape: patterns and processes of forest landscapes in Ontario. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 30–53
  42. Tyre AJ, Possingham HP, Lindenmayer DB (2001) Inferring process from pattern: can territory occupancy provide information about life history parameters? Ecol Appl 11(6):1722–1737. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1722:IPFPCT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  43. Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82(5):1205–1218. doi: 10.2307/2679983 · DOI
  44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2000) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for the contiguous U.S. distinct population segment of the Canada lynx and related rule; final rule. Fed Reg 65:16052–16086
  45. Vashon JH, Meehan AL, Jakubas WH, Organ JF, Vashon AD, McLaughlin CR, Matula GJ Jr, Crowley SM (2008a) Spatial ecology of a Canada lynx population in northern Maine. J Wildl Manag 72(7):1479–1487. doi: 10.2193/2007-462 · DOI
  46. Vashon JH, Meehan AL, Organ JF, Jakubas WH, McLaughlin CR, Vashon AD, Crowley SM (2008b) Diurnal habitat relationships of Canada lynx in an intensively managed private forest landscape in northern Maine. J Wildl Manag 72(7):1488–1496. doi: 10.2193/2007-475 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Walpole, A. A., Bowman, J., Murray, D. L., & Wilson, P. J.
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-02-28
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
761-773
ISSN
  • 0921-2973
  • 1572-9761
DOI
10.1007/s10980-012-9728-1
Cited by
74
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review