The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interlaboratory comparison of size measurements on nanoparticles using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)
Open accessAbstract
One of the key challenges in the field of nanoparticle (NP) analysis is in producing reliable and reproducible characterisation data for nanomaterials. This study looks at the reproducibility using a relatively new, but rapidly adopted, technique, Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) on a range of particle sizes and materials in several different media. It describes the protocol development and presents both the data and analysis of results obtained from 12 laboratories, mostly based in Europe, who are primarily QualityNano members. QualityNano is an EU FP7 funded Research Infrastructure that integrates 28 European analytical and experimental facilities in nanotechnology, medicine and natural sciences with the goal of developing and implementing best practice and quality in all aspects of nanosafety assessment. This study looks at both the development of the protocol and how this leads to highly reproducible results amongst participants. In this study, the parameter being measured is the modal particle size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Filipe, V., Hawe, A., & Jiskoot, W. (2010) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 · Cited by 1,885
Time Evolution of the Nanoparticle Protein Corona
Casals, E., Pfaller, T., Duschl, A., Oostingh, G. J., & Puntes, V. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn901372t · Cited by 1,211
Cited by
Welsh, J. A., Goberdhan, D. C. I., O'Driscoll, L., Buzas, E. I., Blenkiron, C., Bussolati, B., Cai, H., Di Vizio, D., Driedonks, T. A. P., Erdbrügger, U., et al. (2024) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12404 · Cited by 4,663
Erdbrügger, U., Blijdorp, C. J., Bijnsdorp, I. V., Borràs, F. E., Burger, D., Bussolati, B., Byrd, J. B., Clayton, A., Dear, J. W., Falcón‐Pérez, J. M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12093 · Cited by 404
Separation, characterization and identification of microplastics and nanoplastics in the environment
Fu, W., Min, J., Jiang, W., Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137561 · Cited by 361
Size Characterization and Quantification of Exosomes by Asymmetrical-Flow Field-Flow Fractionation
Sitar, S., Kejžar, A., Pahovnik, D., Kogej, K., Tušek-Žnidarič, M., Lenassi, M., & Žagar, E. (2015) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01636 · Cited by 283
O’Brien, K. P., Khan, S., Gilligan, K. E., Zafar, H., Lalor, P., Glynn, C., O’Flatharta, C., Ingoldsby, H., Dockery, P., De Bhulbh, A., et al. (2018) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-017-0116-9 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Hole, P., Sillence, K., Hannell, C., Maguire, C. M., Roesslein, M., Suarez, G., Capracotta, S., Magdolenova, Z., Horev-Azaria, L., Dybowska, A., Cooke, L., Haase, A., Contal, S., Manø, S., Vennemann, A., Sauvain, J.-J., Staunton, K. C., Anguissola, S., Luch, A., Dusinska, M., Korenstein, R., Gutleb, A. C., Wiemann, M., Prina-Mello, A., Riediker, M., & Wick, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanoparticle Research
- Published
- 2013-11-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2101-2101
- ISSN
- 1388-0764 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2024649509
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interlaboratory comparison of size measurements on nanoparticles using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11051-013-2101-8
- The paper
- Hole, P., Sillence, K., Hannell, C., Maguire, C. M., Roesslein, M., Suarez, G., Capracotta, S., Magdolenova, Z., Horev-Azaria, L., Dybowska, A., Cooke, L., Haase, A., Contal, S., Manø, S., Vennemann, A., Sauvain, J.-J., Staunton, K. C., Anguissola, S., Luch, A., . . . Wick, P. (2013). Interlaboratory comparison of size measurements on nanoparticles using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Journal of Nanoparticle Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-2101-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
