Cited by 109Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Neurobiological and Cognitive Profile of Young Binge Drinkers: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Lees, Briana, Mewton, Louise, Stapinski, Lexine A., Squeglia, Lindsay M., Rae, Caroline D., Teesson, Maree·2019·Neuropsychology Review

Abstract

This review provides the first systematic and quantitative synthesis of the literature examining the relationship between binge drinking, cognition, brain structure and function in youth aged 10 to 24 years. PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO and ProQuest were searched for neuroimaging, neurophysiological, and neuropsychological studies. A total of 58 studies (21 neuroimaging, 16 neurophysiological, 21 neuropsychological) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Overall, abnormal or delayed development of key frontal executive-control regions may predispose youth to binge drink. These abnormalities appear to be further exacerbated by the uptake of binge drinking, in addition to alcohol-related neural aberrations in reward-seeking and incentive salience regions, indexed by cognitive deficits and maladaptive alcohol associations. A meta-analysis of neuropsychological correlates identified that binge drinking in youth was associated with a small overall neurocognitive deficit (g = -0.26) and specific deficits in decision-making (g = -1.70), and inhibition (g = -0.39). Using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence Profile, the certainty in outcomes ranged from very low to low. Future prospective longitudinal studies should address concomitant factors, exposure thresholds, and age-related vulnerabilities of binge drinking, as well as the degree of recovery following discontinuation of use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11065-019-09411-w

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a well-established relationship between adolescent alcohol exposure, brain development, and cognitive functioning.

    “Furthermore, there is a well-established relationship between adolescent alcohol exposure (AAE), brain development, and cognitive functioning [20, 30]”

    From Consequences of adolescent drug use (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction reports associations between youth binge drinking, brain development, and cognitive differences. But the Conclusion says findings on binge drinking’s impact on brain and cognitive development are not yet consistent or replicated. Calling the relationship with adolescent alcohol exposure generally “well-established” overstates this source’s narrower, qualified findings. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hedges LV, & Olkin I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  2. Strauss E, Sherman EM & Spreen O 2006 A compendium of neuropsychologial tests: Adminstration, norms, and commentary (3rd Ed.), American Chemical Society.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lees, B., Mewton, L., Stapinski, L. A., Squeglia, L. M., Rae, C. D., & Teesson, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Lees, Briana
Venue
Neuropsychology Review
Published
2019-09
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
357-385
ISSN
  • 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6660
OpenAlex
W2972850215
Cited by
109
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (GNT1169377, GNT1132853)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K23 AA025399)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
binge drinking, adolescent alcohol use, youth, neurocognitive impairment, decision-making, inhibition, executive function, frontal lobe development, reward processing, incentive salience, brain structure and function, alcohol-related cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Decision Making, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Executive Function, Binge Drinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review