Cited by 30Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceHallucinations in medical conditionsParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

A qualitative analysis of sensory phenomena induced by perceptual deprivation

Lloyd, Donna M., Lewis, Elizabeth, Payne, Jacob, Wilson, Lindsay·2012·Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11097-011-9233-z

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lloyd, D. M., Lewis, E., Payne, J., & Wilson, L.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Elizabeth
Venue
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Published
2011-11-16
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
95-112
ISSN
  • 1568-7759 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8676
OpenAlex
W2152811813
Cited by
30
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
sensory deprivation, misunderstanding, hallucinations, visual phenomena, multisensory environment, conscious awareness, exploratory behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review