Cited by 179Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses

Merabet, Lotfi B., Rizzo, Joseph F., Amedi, Amir, Somers, David C., Pascual-Leone, Alvaro·2005·Nature reviews. Neuroscience

Abstract

Significant progress has been made in the development of visual neuroprostheses to restore vision in blind individuals. Appropriate delivery of electrical stimulation to intact visual structures can evoke patterned sensations of light in those who have been blind for many years. However, success in developing functional visual prostheses requires an understanding of how to communicate effectively with the visually deprived brain in order to merge what is perceived visually with what is generated electrically.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1586

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another significant limiting factor for better artificial vision is the insufficient understanding of the neural visual code in blind individuals and the effect of visual deprivation and plasticity.

    “Another significant limiting factor for better artificial vision is the insufficient understanding of the neural visual code in blind individuals and the effect of visual deprivation and plasticity [203].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merabet, L. B., Rizzo, J. F., Amedi, A., Somers, D. C., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Merabet, Lotfi B.
Venue
Nature reviews. Neuroscience
Published
2005-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
71-77
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2035742535
Cited by
179
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
visual prosthesis, blindness, neuroplasticity, electrical stimulation, visual perception, visual cortex, retinal prosthesis, vision restoration
MeSH terms
Animals, Blindness, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Vision, Ocular, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review