Cited by 22Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis

In silico comparison of marine, terrestrial and synthetic compounds using ChemGPS-NP for navigating chemical space

Muigg, Patrik, Rosén, Josefin, Bohlin, Lars, Backlund, Anders·2013·Phytochemistry Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11101-012-9256-2

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unique diversity within a single chemical class is in agreement with Muigg et al 2013 who reported a unique distinction between marine and terrestrial compounds by using chemical property space.

    “The unique diversity within a single chemical class was noted to be in agreement with Muigg et al 2013 who reported a unique distinction between marine and terrestrial compounds by using chemical property space [235].”

    From Marine Natural Products: A Source of Novel Anticancer Drugs (2019) · cites this paper as [235]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muigg, P., Rosén, J., Bohlin, L., & Backlund, A.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Backlund, Anders
Venue
Phytochemistry Reviews
Published
2012-11-07
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
449-457
ISSN
  • 1568-7767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-980X
OpenAlex
W2005688310
Cited by
22
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Phytochemistry Reviews (publishedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Keywords
marine natural products, synthetic compounds, molecular flexibility, molecular size, polarity, aromaticity, heteroatom content, chemical diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review