The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, there is mixed research regarding whether corrections may actually increase belief in the original misinformation 121,124-126 or in other misleading claims that fail to get corrected 127 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [126]
In the citing paper
“This has brought researchers to conclude that negative influence effect is elusive, with limited relevance for politics outside the laboratory (88, 90, 93–95): while we may be less influenced by our political opponents, we are unlikely to be negatively influenced by them.”
From How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting (2022) · cites this paper as [90]
Citations
Cites
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785 · cited 1×
“Developing counter-arguments would be unusually effortful, as sophisticated respondents can simply filter out, rather than counterargue, unwelcome facts (Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundThe Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,150
Eulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,744
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344
WEIRD languages have misled us, too
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1000018x · Cited by 4,177
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · Cited by 3,173
Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial
Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2365 · Cited by 1,300
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
- Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental designs. New York: Wiley.
- Lippman, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
- Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Edelman, C., Passo, W., Banks, A., Boston, E., et al. (2015). Answering on cue?. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College.
- Prior, M. (2007). Is partisan bias in perceptions of objective conditions real? The effect of an accuracy incentive on the stated beliefs of partisans. In Annual conference of the Midwestern Political Science Association.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 906
Muddiman, A., Budak, C., Murray, C., Kim, Y., & Stroud, N. J. (2022) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2022.2120521 · Cited by 4
Goyanes, M., Lee, S., Salgado, S., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2025) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2025.2508767 · Cited by 3
Zhou, Y., Chen, E., Pisipati, M., Xiong, A., & Rajtmajer, S. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757588 · Cited by 4
Alyukov, M., & Zavadskaya, M. (2026) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s153759272610454x · Cited by 3
Online oral health misinformation and information quality: a scoping review
Oddy, J., & Holden, A. C. L. (2026) · BDJ Open · doi:10.1038/s41405-026-00457-6 · Cited by 4
A Theological Engagement with the Science of Science Skepticism
Reeves, J. A. (2022) · TheoLogica An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology · doi:10.14428/thl.v6i1.61263 · Cited by 2
Leading the Horse to Water? Investigating the Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Hate Crimes
Qiu, L., Qiao, D., Tan, B. C. Y., & Whinston, A. B. (2024) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1177/10591478231224944 · Cited by 3
Pradel, F. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241244735 · Cited by 4
Lee, M.-C. (2024) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/730621 · Cited by 3
Blanchar, J. C., & Norris, C. J. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-157 · Cited by 4
Shi, N., Liang, J., Yi, Y., Miao, R., Yang, X., Yang, L., Tao, T., Zhang, Y., Jin, H., & Zheng, X. (2024) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12759 · Cited by 3
Aruguete, N., Calvo, E. F., & Ventura, T. (2025) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680251323120 · Cited by 5
Time is the fire in which message effects burn: Decay and sustenance of correction effects over time
Chae, J. H., Groeling, T. J., & Song, H. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf030 · Cited by 3
Fact-checking as a policy focus in the EU
Bleyer-Simon, K. (2025) · Medijske studije · doi:10.20901/ms.16.31.1 · Cited by 3
The wilful rejection of psychological and behavioural interventions
Roozenbeek, J., Young, D. J., & Madsen, J. K. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102138 · Cited by 4
Inoculation against Populism: Media Competence Education and Political Autonomy
Podschwadek, F. (2019) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2018-0035 · Cited by 4
Anxiety as a Positive Epistemic Emotion in Politics
Brasi, L. D., Guglielmetti-Serrano, F., & Rosati, A. (2021) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2021.1924994 · Cited by 3
Fountoulakis, K. Ν. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86541-2_25 · Cited by 3
Social Psychology of Identity and Stereotyping in the Media
Lido, C. M., Swyer, A., & Amicis, L. D. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190935856.003.0007 · Cited by 3
Is Resistance Futile? Citizen Knowledge, Motivated Reasoning, and Fact-Checking
Szewach, P., Reifler, J., & Oscarsson, H. E. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003111474-9 · Cited by 3
Herrera-Masurel, A., Altay, S., & Mercier, H. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000477 · Cited by 3
Towards implementation of warrant-based content self-moderation
Lin, H. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00683-y · Cited by 3
Countering “Fake News” Through Public Education and Advertisements: An Experimental Analysis
Winger, G. H., Oliver, A., Vićić, J., & Schaeffer, A. B. (2023) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231224084 · Cited by 4
The Fitness-Validation Model of Propagandist Persuasion and the 5Ds of Propaganda
Adam‐Troian, J. (2024) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000442 · Cited by 4
Solutions and Challenges for Addressing Misinformation
Martel, C., & Rand, D. G. (2025) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/07439156251352415 · Cited by 3
Injusticia testimonial utilizada como arma
Almagro, M., Osorio, J., & Fernández, N. V. (2021) · Las Torres de Lucca International Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.5209/ltdl.76462 · Cited by 3
Marcon, A. R., Wagner, D. N., Giles, C., & Isenor, C. (2022) · JMIR Infodemiology · doi:10.2196/38242 · Cited by 21
Silverman, D. M., Kent, D., & Gelpi, C. F. (2021) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/00220027211036935 · Cited by 3
Rational Choice and Information Processing
Chong, D., & Mullinix, K. J. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.009 · Cited by 3
Interventions to mitigate vaping misinformation: protocol for a scoping review
Kumar, N., Hampsher, S., Walter, N., Nyhan, K., Ding, Q., Tracy, K., Jones-Jang, S. M., Nyhan, B. J., Choudhury, M. D., & Forastiere, L. (2022) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-022-02094-0 · Cited by 8
Designing Indicators to Combat Fake MediaPreprint
Sherman, I. N., Redmiles, E. M., & Stokes, J. W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.00544 · Cited by 7
Cope, K. L., & Crabtree, C. D. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3774739 · Cited by 3
Confronting Disinformation: Journalists and the Conflict over Truth in #Elxn43Preprint
Tenove, C., & MacLellan, S. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/p3r8q · Cited by 3
What drives support for QAnon? Evidence from a survey experimentPreprint
Thompson, J., & Thomander, S. D. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/23qaj · Cited by 3
Does Information Change Attitudes Towards Immigrants?
Roth, C. (2016) · AEA Randomized Controlled Trials · doi:10.1257/rct.1092-1.0 · Cited by 3
Combining Refutations and Social Norms Increases Belief ChangePreprint
Ecker, U. K. H., Sanderson, J. A., McIlhiney, P., Rowsell, J., Quekett, H., Brown, G. D. A., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j9w8q · Cited by 3
Confronting Core Issues: A Critical Test of Attitude PolarizationPreprint
Velez, Y. R., & Liu, P. (2023) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2023-gxh3l · Cited by 3
Confronting Core Issues: A Critical Test of Attitude PolarizationPreprint
Velez, Y. R., & Liu, P. (2023) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2023-gxh3l-v2 · Cited by 4
Media platforming and the normalisation of extreme right viewsPreprint
Bolet, D., & Foos, F. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/urhxy · Cited by 3
Critical thinking instruction for the post-truth era
Howat, A., Bruschke, J. C., & Ocampo, M. (2022) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/10511431.2022.2125698 · Cited by 2
Klapproth, J., Unger, S., Pohl, J., Boberg, S., Grimme, C., & Quandt, T. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.298 · Cited by 1
Media Use, Feelings of Being Devalued, and Democratically Corrosive Sentiment in the US
Bimber, B., Labarre, J., Gómez, D., Nikiforov, I., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2024) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241253455 · Cited by 2
Nandakumar, A., & Rajivan, P. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3688598 · Cited by 2
Thomas, J. G., & Autry, K. S. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70004 · Cited by 3
Fact-checks focus on famous politicians, not partisans
Greene, K. T., Pisharody, N., Carroll, F., & Shapiro, J. N. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae567 · Cited by 4
The Phase Model of Misinformation Interventions
Heuer, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711088 · Cited by 2
Why the marketplace of ideas needs more markets
Chomanski, B. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.48 · Cited by 2
Moral education and the psychology of moral discourse
Heinzelmann, N. C. (2025) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2025.2453687 · Cited by 4
Argumentation strategies in party competition
Hafer, C., Izzo, F., & Landa, D. (2025) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12983 · Cited by 2
Gagnon, K. W., Corey, S. L., Gordon, J. D., Risisky, D., & Coulter, R. W. S. (2025) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2025.2520497 · Cited by 2
Wahlheim, C. N., Kemp, P. L., Wiley, R. W., & Engelhardt, A. (2025) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01760-7 · Cited by 3
Bhoi, S., Jha, V. K., & Kumar, R. (2026) · The International Information & Library Review · doi:10.1080/10572317.2026.2620350 · Cited by 2
Do Beliefs Echo? On the Persistent Effects of Misinformation After Effective Corrections
Fenger, J., & Larsen, M. V. (2026) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2026.2623049 · Cited by 2
Prior beliefs & automated fact checking: Limits on the effectiveness of AI-based corrections
Amaddio, K. M., Goebel, J. T., Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., Garrett, R. K., Susmann, M. W., & Parthasarathy, S. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0342332 · Cited by 2
Public opinion on police misconduct: Discrimination and information resistance
Eck, K., & Steinert, C. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb9501 · Cited by 2
Opinion dynamics: Statistical physics and beyond
Starnini, M., Baumann, F., Galla, T., Garcia, D., Íñiguez, G., Karsai, M., Lorenz, J., & Sznajd-Weron, K. (2026) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/j1zg-ddqv · Cited by 57
FactCheking and verification in the journalism activity
Shevchenko, V. (2018) · Obraz · doi:10.21272/2415-8496-2018-1(27)-140-153 · Cited by 2
Bose, M., & Burnett, C. M. (2021) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s104909652100144x · Cited by 2
Persuasive and Unpersuasive Critiques of Torture
Hassner, R. E. (2022) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721004138 · Cited by 2
What the Neuroscience and Psychology of Magic Reveal about Misinformation
Alexander, R. G., Macknik, S. L., & Martínez‐Conde, S. (2022) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications10040033 · Cited by 4
Ideology, knowledge, and the assessment of science policy agencies
Haglin, K., & Vedlitz, A. (2023) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scad020 · Cited by 2
Dauphin, F. (2024) · Les Enjeux de l information et de la communication · doi:10.3917/enic.hs13.0031 · Cited by 2
Exploring the impact of automated correction of misinformation in social media
Burel, G., Tavakoli, M. A., & Alani, H. (2024) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12180 · Cited by 4
Lin, H. Y., Lee, J., Wang, Y., & Kim, Y. (2024) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2024.2383889 · Cited by 4
Prike, T., Baker, J. R., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13059 · Cited by 4
Shayegh, J., Baysu, G., & Turner, R. N. (2025) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13073 · Cited by 3
Wishful thinking in response to events: Evidence from the 2021 German federal election
Barnfield, M., Phillips, J. B., Stoeckel, F., Mérola, V., Stöckli, S., Lyons, B. A., Thompson, J., Szewach, P., & Reifler, J. (2025) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102940 · Cited by 2
Ansari, S., & Alam, M. Z. (2025) · ACM International Workshop on Multimedia AI against Disinformation (MAD) · doi:10.1145/3733567.3735568 · Cited by 2
Spampatti, T., Brosch, T., Mumenthaler, C., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70012 · Cited by 9
Beyond Fact-Checking: The Importance of Logic-Checking in Public Discourse
Ryan, S., & Hammerton, M. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2549830 · Cited by 2
Explaining Evidence Denial as Motivated Pragmatically Rational Epistemic Irrationality
Shaffer, M. J. (2019) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12382 · Cited by 2
Updating with Others: Testing the Effect of Informational Social Influence on Political Attitudes
Houck, A. M., King, A., & Taylor, J. B. (2021) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12394 · Cited by 4
Yu, Y., Yu, G., Li, T., Man, Q., & Chen, Q. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2971727 · Cited by 2
The Anatomy of Credulity and Incredulity: Or, a Hermeneutics of Misinformation
Biltoft, C. N. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-016 · Cited by 2
Fakten versus Fakes: Was Fact-Checking als Maßnahme gegen Desinformation leisten kann und was nicht
Sängerlaub, A. (2020) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748901334-311 · Cited by 2
Постполитика в сетях постправды
Костырев, А. (2021) · Полис Политические исследования · doi:10.17976/jpps/2021.02.05 · Cited by 3
Innumeracy and State Legislative Salaries
Cooper, C. A. (2021) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab012 · Cited by 2
The Super-Predator Effect: How Negative Targeted Messages Demobilize Black Voters
Stout, C. T., & Baker, K. P. (2021) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123421000338 · Cited by 1
Kjær, C. V., Johansen, N., Marjanović, S. V., Baglini, R., & Adler‐Nissen, R. (2022) · Politica · doi:10.7146/politica.v54i2.132521 · Cited by 2
Hung, C.-L., Lo, S.-H., & Hu, Y.-H. (2023) · Mobile communication in Asia · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2225-2_16 · Cited by 2
Klein, N., & Stavrova, O. (2023) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-023-00034-9 · Cited by 2
Negative Campaigning and Attack Ads
Madsen, J. K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22145-4_9 · Cited by 2
Aggregated fact-checks, partisanship, and perceptions of candidate honesty
Barker, D. C., Martin, D. J., & Nalder, K. L. (2019) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2019.1686394 · Cited by 2
Kang, T., & Sim, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18059 · Cited by 2
Piltch-Loeb, R. N., Su, M., Hughes, B., Testa, M. A., Goldberg, B., Braddock, K. H., Miller‐Idriss, C., Maturo, V., & Savoia, E. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.34116 · Cited by 2
Hahl, O., Kim, M., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2017) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/tkpn5 · Cited by 2
The effectiveness of refutation texts to correct misconceptions among educatorsPreprint
Ferrero, M., Hardwicke, T. E., Konstantinidis, E., & Vadillo, M. A. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ehybj · Cited by 3
Does Observation of Others' Actions Prevent Polarization? Results from Laboratory ExperimentsPreprint
Arai, K., Asako, Y., Hino, A., & Morikawa, S. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8906325/v1 · Cited by 2
van Beynen, J., & Williams, M. N. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/f3svr · Cited by 2
Measuring Law’s Normative ForcePreprint
Cope, K. L. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4456250 · Cited by 2
Affect, Not Ideology: The Heterogeneous Effects of Partisan Cues on Policy SupportPreprint
Fuller, S., de la Cerda, N., & Rametta, J. T. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/4k38a · Cited by 2
Walk, E., Holliday, D. E., Yphtach Lelkes, B., & Westwood, S. J. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/qacmr · Cited by 2
Misinformation Identification and Correction
Tang, R., Neal, C., & Vraga, E. K. (2024) · doi:10.1002/9781394184972.ch9 · Cited by 2
Rescuing Counterspeech: A Bridging-Based Approach to Combating MisinformationPreprint
Peng, K., & Grimmelmann, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4993772 · Cited by 2
Effect of fact-check news on media credibility rating
Jung, S., & Youn, S. (2021) · Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies · doi:10.20879/kjjcs.2021.65.4.001 · Cited by 1
Implications for China and Beyond
Gruffydd-Jones, J. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197643198.003.0009 · Cited by 1
Conspiracy theorists in policing: causes, challenges, and considerations
Evans, N. (2023) · Journal of Policing Intelligence and Counter Terrorism · doi:10.1080/18335330.2023.2203711 · Cited by 3
Chia, S. C., Lu, F., & Gunther, A. C. (2023) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edad016 · Cited by 1
Berlekamp, M., Reifegerste, D., & Temmann, L. J. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2307204 · Cited by 5
Experiments in Living Together
Fuerstein, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197784280.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, T., & Porter, E.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wood, Thomas
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2018-01-16
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-163
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W3126124149
- Cited by
- 904
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 31
- FWCI
- 138.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- The Cato Institute (ID0EMTAG524)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- backfire effect, factual information, partisan attitudes, fact-checking, political polarization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review