Cited by 50Climate Change, Adaptation, MigrationHydropower, Displacement, Environmental ImpactMigration and Labor Dynamics

The use of survey data to study migration-environment relationships in developing countries: alternative approaches to data collection

Open access
Bilsborrow, Richard E., Henry, Sabine J. F.·2012·Population and Environment

Abstract

Growing interest in the environmental aspects of migration is not matched by research on their interrelationships, due partly to the lack of adequate data sets on the two together. Focusing on the microlevel, we describe the data required to effectively investigate these interrelationships. Data sources are discussed, be collected, focusing on household surveys and remote sensing. The main section of the paper describes three alternative approaches to data collection: (a) using existing population and environmental data from different sources, illustrated by Burkina Faso; (b) adding questions to a survey developed for another purpose, illustrated for Guatemala using a DHS survey; and (c) designing a new survey specifically to collect both migration and environmental data to investigate interrelationships, illustrated by Ecuador. Methods used and summary findings are described, followed by a discussion of their advantages and limitations. We conclude with recommendations as to effective use of each approach as research on migration-environment linkages moves forward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11111-012-0177-1

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both retrospective questions and indirect information about absent household members can be prone to biases.

    “Both forms of data collection can be prone to certain biases (Bilsborrow et al., 2012).”

    From Improving the evidence base: A methodological review of the quantitative climate migration literature (2021) · cites this paper as Bilsborrow et al., 2012

    In the Burkina Faso case-study section (page unavailable), the paper says a single-round retrospective survey risks memory lapses, supporting the concern about retrospective questions. The Ecuador case-study section (page unavailable) says household members provided information about absent migrants, but does not say that this proxy information was biased. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Henry S Bilsborrow R 2009 Migrant destination choice: A place utility approach in Burkina Faso, International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, XXVI international population conference Marrakech 27 Sept–3 Oct 2009
  2. Hogan DJ 1991 Crescimento Demográfico e Meio Ambiente. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População (Impresso) ABEP 8 1/2 61 71 12286258
  3. New M Hulme M Jones P 2000 Representing 20th century space-time climate variability. II: Development of 1901–1996 monthly terrestrial climate fields Journal of Climate 13 2217 2238
  4. United Nations 2009 Proceedings of expert group meeting on population distribution, Urbanization, Internal Migration and Development, New York Jan 21–23, 2008 New York UN Population Division
  5. United Nations Technical report on the use of censuses and surveys to measure international migration Report of UN expert group meeting in New York August, 2009 New York UN Statistical Office in press
  6. Zetter R 2011 Protecting environmentally displaced, people Developing the capacity of legal and normative frameworks. Research Report Refugee Studies Center, University of Oxford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bilsborrow, R. E., & Henry, S. J. F.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Namur (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Bilsborrow, Richard E.
  • Henry, Sabine J. F.
Venue
Population and Environment
Published
2012-08-10
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
113-141
ISSN
  • 0199-0039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7810
OpenAlex
W1989608291
Cited by
50
References
96
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Population and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Namur (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Université de Montréal
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD052092)
  • Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
Keywords
environmental migration, household surveys, remote sensing, data collection methods, data integration, developing countries, Burkina Faso, Guatemala, Ecuador

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review