Cited by 210School Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

School Predictors of the Intensity of Implementation of School-Based Prevention Programs: Results from a National Study

Payne, Allison Ann, Gottfredson, Denise C., Gottfredson, Gary D.·2006·Prevention Science

Abstract

Research has indicated that the effectiveness of school-based prevention programs is affected by the implementation quality of these programs. As the importance of implementation has become clearer, researchers have begun to examine factors that appear to be related to implementation quality. Data from a nationally representative sample of 544 schools were used to examine structural equation models representing hypothesized relationships among school and program factors and implementation intensity, controlling for exogenous community factors. Significant relationships were found between implementation intensity and several school and program factors, including local program development process, integration into school operations, organizational capacity, principal support, and standardization. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-006-0029-2

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The culture or climate of an intervention setting can support implementation fidelity.

    “The culture or climate of the environment in which an intervention takes place can promote implementation fidelity (Bradshaw et al. 2009; Gottfredson and Gottfredson 2002; Payne et al. 2006), although it is often overlooked in the dissemination process (Adelman and Taylor 2003; Burns and Hoagwood 2005; Dusenbury et al. 2003; Greenberg et al. 2005; Rohrbach et al. 2006; Wandersman et al. 2008).”
  • MSED administrator backing is crucial for successfully disseminating evidence-based interventions at scale.

    “This level of support is a critical component of successful large scale dissemination of EBIs (e.g., August et al. 2004; Fagan et al. 2008; Payne et al. 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Payne, A. A., Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Villanova University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Payne, Allison Ann
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2006-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
225-237
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W1995075901
Cited by
210
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
22.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
school-based prevention, implementation quality, school factors, program development, organizational capacity, principal support, program standardization
MeSH terms
Models, Theoretical, Preventive Health Services, School Health Services, United States, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review