Cited by 471Health Policy Implementation ScienceSchool Health and Nursing EducationBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Evidence-Based Interventions in Schools: Developers’ Views of Implementation Barriers and Facilitators

Forman, Susan G., Olin, S. Serene, Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton, Crowe, Maura, Saka, Noa·2009·School Mental Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12310-008-9002-5

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This perception is in line with research and models of school-based implementation, which highlight the importance of support of teachers and administrators to successful implementation (Domitrovich et al., 2008; Forman et al., 2009).

    “This perception is in line with research and models of school-based implementation, which highlight the importance of the support of teachers and administrators to successful implementation (Domitrovich et al., 2008; Forman et al., 2009).”
  • Similar barriers and facilitators were found in a study of school-based treatment developers' perceptions of implementation barriers and facilitators (Forman et al., 2009).

    “Similar barriers and facilitators were found in a study of school-based treatment developers’ perceptions of implementation barriers and facilitators (Forman, Olin, Hoagwood, Crowe, & Saka, 2009).”

    From Evidence-Based Mental Health Programs in Schools: Barriers and Facilitators of Successful Implementation (2010) · cites this paper as Forman, Olin, Hoagwood, Crowe, & Saka, 2009

  • Competing responsibilities is consistent with prior research (Forman et al., 2009).

    “and is consistent with prior research (Forman et al., 2009).”
  • Although the frontline clinicians interviewed in this study did not explicitly mention funding as a barrier, this pattern is a reflection of Forman et al.'s (2009) findings in which treatment developers cited funding as the most frequently cited obstacle to successful implementation.

    “Although the frontline clinicians interviewed in this study did not explicitly mention funding as a barrier, this pattern is a reflection of Forman et al.’s (Forman et al. 2009) findings in which treatment developers cited funding as the most frequently cited obstacle to successful implementation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forman, S. G., Olin, S. S., Hoagwood, K. E., Crowe, M., & Saka, N.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Forman, Susan G.
Venue
School Mental Health
Published
2008-11-25
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
26-36
ISSN
  • 1866-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-2633
OpenAlex
W2160116254
Cited by
471
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Psychological Association
  • National Association of School Psychologists
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
evidence-based interventions, school-based intervention, implementation barriers, implementation facilitators, intervention sustainability, administrator support, teacher support, financial resources, stakeholder engagement, employee turnover

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review