Cited by 33Community Health and DevelopmentHealth Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Factors That Predict Financial Sustainability of Community Coalitions: Five Years of Findings from the PROSPER Partnership Project

Open access
Greenberg, Mark T., Feinberg, Mark E., Johnson, Lesley E., Perkins, Daniel F., Welsh, Janet A., Spoth, Richard L.·2015·Prevention Science

Abstract

This study is a longitudinal investigation of the Promoting School-community-university Partnerships to Enhance Resilience (PROSPER) partnership model designed to evaluate the level of sustainability funding by community prevention teams, including which factors impact teams' generation of sustainable funding. Community teams were responsible for choosing, implementing with quality, and sustaining evidence-based programs (EBPs) intended to reduce substance misuse and promote positive youth and family development. Fourteen US rural communities and small towns were studied. Data were collected from PROSPER community team members (N = 164) and prevention coordinators (N = 10) over a 5-year period. Global and specific aspects of team functioning were assessed over six waves. Outcome measures were the total funds (cash and in-kind) raised to implement prevention programs. All 14 community teams were sustained for the first 5 years. However, there was substantial variability in the amount of funds raised, and these differences were predicted by earlier and concurrent team functioning and by team sustainability planning. Given the sufficient infrastructure and ongoing technical assistance provided by the PROSPER partnership model, local sustainability of EBPs is achievable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-014-0483-1

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies suggest that some factors may be uniquely important for sustaining coalitions, including board/team functioning, data/evaluation resources, and planning for sustainability.

    “Studies suggest that some factors may be uniquely important for sustaining coalitions, including board/team functioning, data/evaluation resources, and planning for sustainability (56, 64, 96, 127, 145).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Spoth RL Greenberg M Bierman K Redmond C 2004 PROSPER community-university partnership model for public education systems: Capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention Prevention Science 5 31 39 15058910

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenberg, M. T., Feinberg, M. E., Johnson, L. E., Perkins, D. F., Welsh, J. A., & Spoth, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Greenberg, Mark T.
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2014-04-06
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
158-167
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W1974206150
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA014702, AA14702)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA013709, DA013709)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
financial sustainability, community coalitions, prevention funding, evidence-based programs, substance misuse prevention, youth development, family development, rural communities, small towns, team functioning, sustainability planning, technical assistance
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Community-Institutional Relations, Family Health, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Iowa, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Pennsylvania, Public Health, Program Evaluation, Community Networks, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review