Cited by 17Community Health and DevelopmentHealth Policy Implementation SciencePublic Health Policies and Education

Pathways to Sustainability: 8-Year Follow-Up From the PROSPER Project

Open access
Welsh, Janet A., Chilenski, Sarah M., Johnson, Lesley, Greenberg, Mark T., Spoth, Richard L.·2016·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

The large-scale dissemination of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is often hindered by problems with sustaining initiatives past a period of initial grant funding. Communities often have difficulty generating resources needed to sustain and grow their initiatives, resulting in limited public health impact. The PROSPER project, initiated in 2001, provided community coalitions with intensive technical assistance around marketing, communications, and revenue generating strategies. Past reports from PROSPER have indicated that these coalitions were successful with sustaining their programming, and that sustainability could be predicted by early aspects of team functioning and leadership. The current study examines financial sustainability 8 years following the discontinuation of grant funding, with an emphasis on sources of revenue and the relationships between revenue generation, team functioning, and EBP participation. This study used four waves of data related to resource generation collected between 2004 and 2010 by PROSPER teams in Iowa and Pennsylvania. Teams reported annually on the amount and sources of funding procured, as well as annual reports of team functioning and leadership and annual reports of EBP participation by youth and parents. Data revealed that teams' overall revenue generation increased over time. There was significant variation in success with revenue generation at both the community level and across the two states. Teams accessed a variety of sources. Cash revenue generation was positively and predictively associated with EBP participation, but relationships with team functioning and leadership ratings varied significantly by state. State level differences in in-kind support were also apparent. The results indicated that there are different pathways to sustainability, and that no one method works for all teams. The presence of state level infrastructures available to support prevention appeared to account for significant differences in sustainability success between Pennsylvania and Iowa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-016-0421-z

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results support the assertion that strengthening other sustainability domains may help contribute to program sustainment even in the face of weak financial stability.

    “Thus, the results support the assertion that strengthening other sustainability domains may help contribute to program sustainment even in the face of weak financial stability [27, 42].”

    From Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion says infrastructure support and technical assistance helped PROSPER teams sustain programs and navigate threats to their viability. It does not show that strengthening these areas sustained programs despite weak financial stability; it instead reports that the two teams with the lowest fundraising discontinued prevention activities by Year 8. Our copy does not provide page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Welsh et al. found that the amount of program implementation funds raised over 5 years was predicted by earlier and concurrent team functioning and sustainability planning.

    “They found that the amount of program implementation funds raised over 5 years was predicted by earlier and concurrent team functioning and sustainability planning.”

    From Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports a positive association between team functioning and concurrent funds raised in Iowa, but a largely negative association in Pennsylvania. The paper examines funding through Year 8; it does not report that funds raised over five years were predicted by both earlier and concurrent team functioning and sustainability planning. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By year 8, predictors of funds raised varied across states, with a strong positive association between team functioning and total funds raised in one state and a negative association in the other.

    “However, by year 8, predictors varied across states with a strong positive association between team functioning and total funds raised in one state, and a negative association in the other state.”

    From Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section (Program Sustainability: Funding Trends Over Time; page not provided) reports a strong positive association between team functioning and concurrent funds raised per youth in Iowa, while the association was largely negative in Pennsylvania. The claim captures the state-level contrast but calls the measure “total funds raised,” which the passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These results reinforce the multidimensional and interactive nature of sustainability capacity domains and their role in program sustainment.

    “These results reinforce the multidimensional and interactive nature of sustainability capacity domains and their role in program sustainment [21, 27, 30].”
  • Program sustainment was largely a local process resulting from different relationships in different communities with different resources and infrastructure.

    “The authors concluded that program sustainment was largely a “local process” resulting from different relationships in different communities with different resources and infrastructure [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Akerlund KM 2000 Prevention program sustainability: The state's perspective Journal of Community Psychology 28 3 353 362
  2. Backer TE 2000 The failure of success: Challenges of disseminating effective substance abuse prevention programs Journal of Community Psychology 28 363 373
  3. Greenberg MT Feinberg ME Gomez BJ Osgood DW 2005 Testing a model of coalition functioning and sustainability: A comprehensive study of Communities that Care in Pennsylvania Stockwell T Gruenewald P Toumbourou J Loxley W Preventing harmful substance use: The evidence base for policy and practice Sydney John Wiley
  4. Hansen WB 1992 School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980–1990 Health Education Research 7 3 403 430 10171672
  5. Spoth R Redmond C Shin C Greenberg M Clair S Feinberg M 2007 Substance use outcomes at 18 months past baseline from the PROSPER community-university partnership trial American Journal of Preventive Medicine 32 5 395 402 17478265 PMC2869212

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Welsh, J. A., Chilenski, S. M., Johnson, L., Greenberg, M. T., & Spoth, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Welsh, Janet A.
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2016-02-18
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
263-286
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W2275305916
Cited by
17
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA13709)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
sustainability of community initiatives, evidence-based practice, community coalitions, income generation, financial sustainability, team functioning, leadership, in-kind support, state-level differences
MeSH terms
Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Pennsylvania, Public Health, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review