Cited by 151Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsCommunity Health and DevelopmentCultural Competency in Health Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Encompassing Cultural Contexts Within Scientific Research Methodologies in the Development of Health Promotion Interventions

Open access

Abstract

American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians (AI/AN/NHs) disproportionately experience higher rates of various health conditions. Developing culturally centered interventions targeting health conditions is a strategy to decrease the burden of health conditions among this population. This study analyzes characteristics from 21 studies currently funded under the Interventions for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Native American (NA) Populations program among investigators currently funded under this grant mechanism. Four broad challenges were revealed as critical to address when scientifically establishing culturally centered interventions for Native populations. These challenges were (a) their ability to harness culture-centered knowledge and perspectives from communities; (b) their utilization of Indigenous-based theories and knowledge systems with Western-based intervention paradigms and theories; (c) their use of Western-based methodologies; and (d) their cultural adaptation, if based on an evidence-based treatment. Findings revealed that qualitative methodologies and community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches were very commonly used to finalize the development of interventions. Various Indigenous-based theories and knowledge systems and Western-based theories were used in the methodologies employed. Cultural adaptations were made that often used formative mixed qualitative and quantitative methods. Illustrative examples of strategies used and suggestions for future research are provided. Findings underscored the importance of CBPR methods to improve the efficacy of interventions for AI/AN/NH communities by integrating Indigenous-based theories and knowledge systems with Western science approaches to improve health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-018-0926-1

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Institute of Medicine. (2013). Leveraging culture to address health inequalities: Examples from native communities: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  2. Native American Health Center. (2012). Native vision: A focus on improving behavioral health wellness for California Native Americans-California Reducing Disparities Project Native American population report. Oakland: Native American Health Center.
  3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Office of Applied Studies. (2010). The NSDUH report: Substance use among American Indian or Alaska Native Adults. Rockville: SAMHSA.
  4. Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Oetzel, J., & Minkler, M. (Eds.). (2018). Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 151

Metadata

Authors
Dickerson, D., Baldwin, J. A., Belcourt, A., Belone, L., Gittelsohn, J., Keawe’aimoku Kaholokula, J., Lowe, J., Patten, C. A., & Wallerstein, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • University of Montana (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Dickerson, Daniel
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2018-06-29
Volume
21
Issue
S1
Pages
33-42
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2809803165
Cited by
151
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA022066-04)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (1R01ES022583-01A)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA164533)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1R01HL126577)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (1R01DA037174)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
health promotion, indigenous knowledge, community-based participatory research, cultural adaptation, intervention development, health disparities, research funding programs
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Health Promotion, Humans, Indians, North American, Research Design, United States, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Cultural Competency, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review