Cited by 1,126Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Suicidal desire and the capability for suicide: Tests of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior among adults.

Van Orden, Kimberly A., Witte, Tracy K., Gordon, Kathryn H., Bender, Theodore W., Joiner, Thomas E.·2008·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior (T. E. Joiner, 2005) proposes that an individual will not die by suicide unless he or she has both the desire to die by suicide and the ability to do so. Three studies test the theory's hypotheses. In Study 1, the interaction of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness predicted current suicidal ideation. In Study 2, greater levels of acquired capability were found among individuals with greater numbers of past attempts. Results also indicated that painful and provocative experiences significantly predicted acquired capability scores. In Study 3, the interaction of acquired capability and perceived burdensomeness predicted clinician-rated risk for suicidal behavior. Implications for the etiology, assessment, and treatment of suicidal behavior are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.76.1.72

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In initial tests by the authors' laboratory, the number of past suicide attempts was positively correlated with self-reported acquired capability, and people with multiple past attempts reported the highest levels.

    “Results indicated that number of past attempts positively correlated with levels of acquired capability, with highest levels of acquired capability reported by individuals with multiple past attempts.”

    From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Van Orden, Witte, Gordon, Bender, & Joiner, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Gordon, K. H., Bender, T. W., & Joiner, T. E.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2008
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
72-83
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2017304298
Cited by
1,126
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 51
FWCI
23.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, interpersonal theory of suicide, desire for death, acquired capability, thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, suicide attempts, suicide risk assessment, adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Personality Inventory, Psychological Theory, Psychometrics, Recurrence, Social Desirability, Social Identification, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review