Cited by 24Digital Mental Health InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Effectiveness of Online Interventions for the Universal and Selective Prevention of Mental Health Problems Among Adolescents: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Noh, Dabok, Kim, Hyunlye·2023·Prevention Science

Abstract

With the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as a threat to mental health, the demand for online interventions that can replace face-to-face approaches for the prevention of mental health problems is increasing. Although several previous reviews on online interventions have targeted adolescents with symptoms of or those diagnosed with mental illness, there is still a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of online preventive interventions for general and at-risk adolescents. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of online interventions on the prevention of an increase in the scores of stress, anxiety, and depression in general and at-risk adolescents. A search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library CENTRAL. Altogether, 19 studies were included, and 16 studies were used for the meta-analysis. Our results showed that cognitive behavioral therapy and family-based interventions were most commonly used. Twelve and seven studies conducted universal and selective preventive interventions, respectively. The meta-analysis showed that online interventions significantly prevent an increase in depression score but not in stress and anxiety scores. Evidence regarding the prevention of increases in stress and anxiety scores is limited, suggesting the need for further randomized controlled trials on online interventions for stress and anxiety in adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-022-01443-8

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses focusing on Internet-delivered prevention reported small significant effects on subclinical symptoms, generally smaller or insignificant for adolescents compared to adults.

    “Meta-analyses with a specific focus on Internet-delivered prevention reported small significant effects on subclinical symptoms [45, 61–63], which were generally smaller or even insignificant for adolescents compared to adults [62].”

    From Efficacy of a transdiagnostic Internet prevention approach in adolescents (EMPATIA study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports a smaller effect on depression scores in this adolescent prevention review than in two earlier reviews, and a nonsignificant anxiety effect where those reviews found significant effects. But it describes the earlier reviews as involving children and adolescents with symptoms or diagnoses—not adults—so it does not support the claimed adolescent-versus-adult comparison. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most studies in adolescents so far have focused on subthreshold depression and could not show any significant reductions in anxiety and stress.

    “Furthermore, RCTs on Internet-delivered interventions for a broad range of subclinical symptoms are needed as most studies in adolescents so far have focused on subthreshold depression and could not show any significant reductions in anxiety and stress [45].”

    From Efficacy of a transdiagnostic Internet prevention approach in adolescents (EMPATIA study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results (Effects of Online Interventions on Stress, Anxiety, and Depression; page not supplied) report no significant intervention–control differences in the pooled stress and anxiety scores. The Study Characteristics report that depression was assessed more often than anxiety or stress, but do not establish that most studies focused on subthreshold depression. The null findings are pooled results, not a finding that no individual study showed a significant reduction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Higgins J. P. T., Li T., & Deeks, J. J. (2021). Chapter 6. Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. In J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, & V. A. Welch (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2. Cochrane. https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noh, D., & Kim, H.
Affiliations
  • Eulji University (KR)
  • Chosun University (KR)
Corresponding author
Noh, Dabok
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2022-10-01
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
353-364
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W4298326594
Cited by
24
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018R1C1B5041097)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
online intervention, mental health prevention, adolescents, universal prevention, selective prevention, depression prevention, anxiety prevention, stress prevention, cognitive behavioral therapy, family intervention, COVID-19 pandemic, at-risk youth
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, COVID-19, Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review