Cited by 122Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStudent Stress and CopingDigital Mental Health Interventions

Reducing stress and enhancing academic buoyancy among adolescents using a brief web- based program based on acceptance and commitment therapy: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Puolakanaho, Anne, Lappalainen, Raimo, Lappalainen, Päivi, Muotka, Joona S., Hirvonen, Riikka, Eklund, Kenneth M., Ahonen, Timo P. S., Kiuru, Noona·2019·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Acceptance and commitment therapy programs have rarely been used as preventive tools for alleviating stress and enhancing coping skills among adolescents. This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of a novel Finnish web- and mobile-delivered five-week intervention program called Youth COMPASS among a general sample of ninth-grade adolescents (n= 249, 49% females). The intervention group showed a small but significant decrease in overall stress (between-group Cohen's d = 0.22) and an increase in academic buoyancy (d= 0.27). Academic skills did not influence the intervention gains, but the intervention gains were largest among high-stressed participants. The results suggest that the acceptance and commitment based Youth COMPASS program may be well suited for promoting adolescents' well-being in the school context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-018-0973-8

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Puolakanaho et al. (2019), there was no statistically significant effect on stress on the study-designed stress measure in intention-to-treat analysis (p > .05; ES not reported).

    “Stress Stress measure designed for study >.05 (Intention-to- treat analysis) ES not reported”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy interventions in secondary schools and their impact on students' mental health and well-being: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Puolakanaho et al. (2019)

    The Results (Intention-to-treat analyses; page unavailable) report no statistically significant change in overall or school stress (p > .05), and the paper reports effect sizes for per-protocol analyses rather than for intention-to-treat analyses. The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) describe the stress measures as drawing on earlier measures, so the description 'designed for study' is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Puolakanaho et al. (2019), ACT compared with normal lessons produced a statistically significant between-groups pre-post improvement in stress on a study-designed stress measure in per-protocol analysis with a small effect size (d = 0.22).

    “Stress Stress measure designed for study 0.037* (Per protocol analysis) BG pre-post ES = small (d = 0.22)”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy interventions in secondary schools and their impact on students' mental health and well-being: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Puolakanaho et al. (2019)

    The Results (Differences in the Groups and Their Outcomes, Tables 4–5; page unavailable) report a significant per-protocol between-group change in overall stress (one-tailed p = 0.037) and a small corrected effect size (d = 0.22). The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) describe the stress question but cite earlier work for its validity; our copy does not establish that the measure was designed for this study. The control group received normal school support without the intervention, rather than being described specifically as receiving only normal lessons. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The earlier version of the guided online ACT intervention was effective in alleviating depression and stress and improving life satisfaction among adolescents who actively participated.

    “We previously reported that the earlier version of the guided online ACT intervention under investigation in the current paper was effective in alleviating depression and stress and improving life satisfaction among adolescents who actively participated in the intervention ((Puolakanaho et al., 2019); (Lappalainen et al., 2021)).”

    From Brief online ACT intervention to improve adolescents' well-being: Effectiveness among adolescents with depressive symptoms during COVID-19. (2024) · cites this paper as Puolakanaho et al., 2019

    The Results (Differences in the Groups and Their Outcomes; page unavailable) report a small, statistically significant reduction in overall stress among adolescents who advanced sufficiently through the program. The Methods (Measures and Statistical Analysis; page unavailable) identify stress and academic buoyancy as outcomes, but this paper does not report reductions in depression or improvements in life satisfaction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The earlier version of the program, Youth Compass, was effective in improving life satisfaction and academic buoyancy and decreasing stress.

    “the intervention is based on an earlier version of the program, Youth Compass , which has been previ ously reported to be effective in improving life satisfaction and academic buoyancy and decreasing stress (Puolakanaho et al., 2019).”

    From Brief online ACT intervention to improve adolescents' well-being: Effectiveness among adolescents with depressive symptoms during COVID-19. (2024) · cites this paper as Puolakanaho et al., 2019

    The Discussion reports improvements in overall stress and academic buoyancy for participants who completed at least three modules, but no differences from controls in the intention-to-treat analysis. The Limitations section says only stress, school-related stress, and academic buoyancy were examined as outcomes; it does not support an improvement in life satisfaction. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One out of the six studies that demonstrated significant results used a universal intervention (Puolakanaho et al., 2019).

    “One out of the six studies that demonstrated significant results used a universal intervention (Puolakanaho et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. APA (American Psychological Association). (2014). Stress in America. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/02/teen-stress.aspx.
  2. Coe, R., (2002, September 12-14). It’s the Effect Size, Stupid. What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, England. Retrieved from https://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm.
  3. Livheim, F. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy in school setting: to cope with stress, a randomized controlled trial (Unpublished master’s thesis). Uppsala University, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.livskompass.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/act-i-skolan-2004.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puolakanaho, A., Lappalainen, R., Lappalainen, P., Muotka, J. S., Hirvonen, R., Eklund, K. M., Ahonen, T. P. S., & Kiuru, N.
Affiliations
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Puolakanaho, Anne
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2018-12-17
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
287-305
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2904044857
Cited by
122
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Keski-Suomen Rahasto
  • Strategic Research Council (292466 for 2015–20)
  • Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia (No. 2016-2019)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, adolescents, stress reduction, academic buoyancy, online intervention, coping strategies, school well-being, ninth grade students, preventive interventions
MeSH terms
Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Academic Success, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Female, Finland, Humans, Male, School Health Services, Stress, Psychological, Students, Internet, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review