The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of the Swedish translation of the general self-efficacy scale
Abstract
Purpose To study the internal consistency, factorial structure, and convergent validity of the Swedish translation of the General Self-Efficacy scale (S-GSE).Methods The S-GSE and two items on mental and physical work capacity were completed by a randomized population cohort (n = 4,027) and two cohorts (n = 3,310 and n = 498) of incident cases of sick-leave (>14 days).Results S-GSE means were higher among men than women in two of the cohorts and higher in the randomized population cohort than in the two sick-leave cohorts. Internal consistency was high with α = .90. Unidimensionality was indicated and factor loadings ranged between .64 and .80. Moderate correlations (.35-.38) between the S-GSE and mental work capacity were found in all cohorts. Yet, the correlation between S-GSE and physical work capacity was weaker in the sick-leave cohorts. The psychometric properties showed similar patterns across gender.Conclusions Across three cohorts, additionally stratified by gender, the S-GSE comprised one single latent factor and showed high internal consistency. However, since S-GSE was more strongly related to self-assessments of mental work capacity than physical work capacity regardless of sick-leave status, the S-GSE may not be a strong predictor of beliefs about physical work capacity across all populations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In previous analysis using partly the same data set [20], we concluded that participants had lower self-efficacy (mean 2.3) compared to the general population (mean 2.9) [26, 27].”
From Strengthened General Self-Efficacy with Multidisciplinary Vocational Rehabilitation in Women on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Randomised Controlled Trial. (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The GSE has been validated and translated into Swedish [27].”
From Strengthened General Self-Efficacy with Multidisciplinary Vocational Rehabilitation in Women on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Randomised Controlled Trial. (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663 · Cited by 4,028
Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents
Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2006) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-750-3 · Cited by 3,544
Toward an Emotion Nuanced Sensemaking Perspective of Organizational Consultation
Lundberg, C. C. (2000) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-837-120251015 · Cited by 3,340
Is General Self-Efficacy a Universal Construct?1
Scholz, U., Gutiérrez Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242 · Cited by 1,637
General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: evidence from five countries
Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez‐Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207590444000041 · Cited by 1,127
Perceived self-efficacy in health behaviour research: Conceptualisation, measurement and correlates
Leganger, A., Kraft, P., & R⊘ysamb, E. (2000) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440008400288 · Cited by 328
Psychometric properties of Work Ability Index in the light of comparative survey study
Radkiewicz, P., & Widerszal‐Bazyl, M. (2005) · International Congress Series · doi:10.1016/j.ics.2005.02.089 · Cited by 209
Assessment and promotion of work ability, health and well-being of ageing workers
Costa, G., Goedhard, W. J. A., & Ilmarinen, J. (2005) · Cited by 56
Demographic Change and the European Union Labour Market
Lisiankova, K., & Wright, R. E. (2005) · National Institute Economic Review · doi:10.1177/0027950105061497 · Cited by 33
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Self-efficacy measurement and generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A users’s portfolio. Causal control beliefs (pp. 33–39). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.
- Nunnaly, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elden, H., Gutke, A., Kjellby-Wendt, G., Fagevik-Olsén, M., & Östgaard, H. (2016) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1154-0 · Cited by 165
Fors, A., Blanck, E., Ali, L., Ekberg‐Jansson, A., Fu, M. L. X., Kjellberg, I. L., Mäkitalo, Å., Swedberg, K. B., Taft, C., & Ekman, I. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203031 · Cited by 88
Bonsaksen, T., Lerdal, A., Heir, T., Ekeberg, Ø., Skogstad, L., Grimholt, T. K., & Schou-Bredal, I. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494818756701 · Cited by 85
“[16] found GSE to be higher among men compared to women, and to be higher in a randomized population cohort than among persons on sick leave.”
BackgroundJonson, C., Pettersson, J., Rybing, J., Nilsson, H., & Prytz, E. G. (2017) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.020 · Cited by 83
Moksnes, U. K., Eilertsen, M. B., Ringdal, R., Bjørnsen, H. N., & Rannestad, T. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12624 · Cited by 81
Wolf, A., Fors, A., Ulin, K., Thorn, J., Swedberg, K. B., & Ekman, I. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4890 · Cited by 80
Zeng, G., Fung, S.-F., Li, J., Hussain, N., & Yu, P. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00924-9 · Cited by 79
“…Germany’s general population (Hinz et al. 2006), the English-language version was validated with 606 American university students (Scherbaum et al. 2006) and the Swedish version was validated with samples of adult stroke survivors (Lonnfjord and Hagquist 2018) and adolescents (Love et al. 2012).”
MethodAndersson, L. M. C., Moore, C. D., Hensing, G. K. E., Krantz, G., & Nyman, C. S. (2014) · Community Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-014-9722-y · Cited by 73
Self-citationRasch analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in a sample of persons with morbid obesity
Bonsaksen, T., Kottorp, A., Gay, C., Fagermoen, M. S., & Lerdal, A. (2013) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-202 · Cited by 67
Validitas Konstruk Instrumen General Self Efficacy Scale Versi Indonesia
Novrianto, R., Marettih, A. K. E., & Wahyudi, H. (2019) · Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.24014/jp.v15i1.6943 · Cited by 62
Forsman, H., Jansson, I., Leksell, J. K., Lepp, M., Andersson, C. S., Engström, M., & Nilsson, J. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14222 · Cited by 59
Patients' Sense of Security During Palliative Care—What Are the Influencing Factors?
Milberg, A., Friedrichsen, M., Jakobsson, M., Nilsson, E.-C., Niskala, B., Olsson, M., Wåhlberg, R., & Krevers, B. (2014) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.08.021 · Cited by 51
Lönnfjord, V., & Hagquist, C. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9551-y · Cited by 57
“Results showed high internal consistency (α = 0.90), unidimensionality, and factor loadings ranging between 0.64 and 0.80 (Löve et al. 2012).”
InfluentialNwanzu, C. L., & Babalola, S. S. (2019) · International Journal of Engineering Business Management · doi:10.1177/1847979019827149 · Cited by 47
Psychometric properties of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Parkinson's disease
Nilsson, M. H., Hagell, P., & Iwarsson, S. (2015) · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/ane.12368 · Cited by 46
“A cross-national study suggested that general self-efficacy seems to be independent of age but differs between the sexes, with slightly higher GSE scores for men in some countries (7), including Sweden (8).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSánchez‐Teruel, D., Bello, M. A. R., & Naranjo, N. V. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110507 · Cited by 48
Ali, L., Wallström, S., Fors, A., Barenfeld, E., Fredholm, E. M., Fu, M. L. X., Goudarzi, M., Gyllensten, H., Kjellberg, I. L., Swedberg, K. B., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26794 · Cited by 41
Nordin, C. A., Michaelson, P., Gard, G., & Eriksson, M. K. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5634 · Cited by 38
“9) in several populations in European countries [50], and the Swedish version has been validated [49].”
BackgroundMeasurements of self‐efficacy in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A systematic review
Picha, K. J., Jochimsen, K. N., Heebner, N. R., Abt, J. P., Usher, E. L., Capilouto, G. J., & Uhl, T. L. (2018) · Musculoskeletal Care · doi:10.1002/msc.1362 · Cited by 39
Cultural Competence Interventions in European Healthcare: A Scoping Review
De-María, B., Topa, G., & López-González, M. A. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12101040 · Cited by 46
“[131]; Swedish version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale-S-GSE [225].”
BackgroundA Revisit of General Self-Efficacy Scale: Uni- or Multi-dimensional?
Zhou, M. (2015) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9311-4 · Cited by 37
“While numerous studies with western samples defend the original one-factor structure of this construct (e.g., Leganger et al. 2000; Löve et al. 2012; Scholz et al. 2002) via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the one-dimensional nature of the scale with Asian samples was not supported…”
BackgroundAhlin, C., Klang-Söderkvist, B., Johansson, E. K., Björkholm, M., & Löfmark, A. (2017) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2017.01.003 · Cited by 35
Oscarsson, M., Carlbring, P., Andersson, G., & Rozental, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234097 · Cited by 34
“Self-efficacy was measured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (S-GSE, Swedish version, [33]), which contained ten items, including “I can always manage to solve difficult problems if I try hard enough” (1 = not at all true, 4 = exactly true).”
MethodArdern, C. L., Hooper, N., O’Halloran, P., Webster, K. E., & Kvist, J. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/28851 · Cited by 35
Berglund, E., Anderzén, I., Andersén, Å., Carlsson, L., Gustavsson, C., Wallman, T., & Lytsy, P. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15112424 · Cited by 33
“The current version of the GSE has been translated into Swedish and has been validated [17].”
MethodFactorial validity of the Twi versions of five measures of mental health and well-being in Ghana
Appiah, R., Schutte, L., Fadiji, A. W., Wissing, M. P., & Cromhout, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236707 · Cited by 32
“[56] also established evidence for the validity of GSEs, with a high Cronbach’s alpha value of .”
BackgroundResultSwedish Operating Room Nurses and Nurse Anesthetists' Perceptions of Competence and Self-Efficacy
Falk‐Brynhildsen, K., Jaensson, M., Gillespie, B. M., & Nilsson, U. G. (2019) · Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2018.09.015 · Cited by 30
“91, n 5 4,027).(47) Survey respondents also completed a demographic questionnaire covering age, gender, profession, years of experience, and professional qualifications.”
BackgroundArdern, C. L., Kvist, J., on behalf of the BANG Trial Group, Ardern, C. L., Kvist, J., Fältström, A., Stålman, A., O’Halloran, P., Webster, K. E., & Taylor, N. F. (2020) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-020-03508-7 · Cited by 32
“General Self-efficacy Scale [33] score mean (SD)”
Karlsson, L., Gerdle, B. U. C., Takala, E., Andersson, G., & Larsson, B. K. (2016) · SAGE Open Medicine · doi:10.1177/2050312116668933 · Cited by 30
Natural corollaries and recovery after acute ACL injury: the NACOX cohort study protocol
Kvist, J., Gauffin, H., Grevnerts, H. T., Ardern, C. L., Hägglund, M., Stålman, A., & Frobell, R. B. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020543 · Cited by 28
“The General Self Efficacy Scale will be used at baseline to assess the individual’s beliefs that his/her actions determine successful outcome.(26) Knee-specific self-efficacy will be assessed with the subscale of the Knee Self Efficacy Scale that evaluates patients’ perception of future knee function (four questions).”
MethodSlater, D., Kvist, J., & Ardern, C. L. (2022) · Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach · doi:10.1177/19417381221094780 · Cited by 27
“- The Swedish version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES).(22) - The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) rating for global knee function.”
MethodElden, H., Hagberg, H., Wessberg, A., Sengpiel, V., Herbst, A., Bullarbo, M., Bergh, C., Bolin, K., Malbasic, S., Saltvedt, S., et al. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0836-9 · Cited by 27
“Efficacy Scale (GES) [40–44].”
Bartels, S. L., Johnsson, S. I., Boersma, K., Flink, I., McCracken, L. M., Petersson, S., Christie, H. L., Feldman, I., Simons, L. E., Onghena, P., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059152 · Cited by 23
Striberger, R., Zarrouk, M., Kumlien, C., & Axelsson, M. (2023) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01329-2 · Cited by 31
“The Swedish version of the instrument was validated [41, 42].”
MethodMilberg, A., Wåhlberg, R., & Krevers, B. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3564 · Cited by 25
“Selfefficacy was measured using one statement (of 10) from the General Self-Efficacy Scale (a four-point scale (1 = not at all true to 4 = exactly true)) [30,31].”
MethodValidation of the Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale in a Sample of Chinese Employees
Peng, J., Zhang, J., Zhou, X., Wan, Z., Yuan, W., Gui, J., & Xia Shuang, Z. H. U. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755134 · Cited by 37
Cederberg, M., Alsén, S., Ali, L., Ekman, I., Glise, K., Jónsdóttir, I. H., Gyllensten, H., Swedberg, K. B., & Fors, A. (2022) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/30966 · Cited by 25
“Self-efficacy was assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) [47], which has a validated Swedish version [48].”
Carlstedt, E., Lexell, E. M., Pessah-Rasmussen, H., & Iwarsson, S. (2015) · International Journal of Rehabilitation Research · doi:10.1097/mrr.0000000000000131 · Cited by 24
“The GSE has been translated into Swedish (Koskinen-Hagman et al., 1999) and has been shown to be valid (Löve et al., 2012).”
BackgroundMethodBertilsson, M., Vaez, M., Wærn, M., Ahlborg, G., & Hensing, G. K. E. (2014) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-014-9518-5 · Cited by 24
“The GSE has shown high validity and reliability across cultures [47], and the Swedish translation has been validated [48].”
BackgroundSelf-citationSamulowitz, A., Hensing, G. K. E., Haukenes, I., Bergman, S., & Grimby‐Ekman, A. (2022) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05992-5 · Cited by 23
“GSE is closely connected to decisiveness, determination, control and self-confidence [10, 11], associated with traditional masculinity [12, 13], and men show higher GSE compared to women in general population studies [7, 14].”
MethodResultSelf-citationHamann, K., Pilotti, M., & Wilson, B. M. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11070333 · Cited by 33
“that overall, self-efficacy tends to be higher in male students than in female students [11,12] despite some variability in this pattern [13–16].”
Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the self-efficacy for exercise scale
Sabo, A., Kueh, Y. C., & Kuan, G. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215698 · Cited by 22
Self-efficacy corresponds to wrist function after combined plating of distal radius fractures
Björk, M., Niklasson, J., Westerdahl, E., & Sagerfors, M. (2020) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jht.2020.01.001 · Cited by 22
Carlsson, L., Lytsy, P., Anderzén, I., Hallqvist, J., Wallman, T., & Gustavsson, C. (2018) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1490462 · Cited by 23
“Self-efficacy was measured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) consisting of ten questions with responses on four-point Likert scales and summarised, giving 10–40 points [29, 30, 31].”
MethodDeveloping a Single-Item General Self-Efficacy Scale: An Initial Study
Di, W., Nie, Y., Chua, B. L., Chye, S., & Teo, T. P. (2023) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/07342829231161884 · Cited by 20
Steigen, A. M., Finbråten, H. S., & Kleppang, A. L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19053082 · Cited by 19
“Therefore, different generalised self-efficacy scales have been developed, one of which is Schwarzer and Jerusalem’s [15] General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), which is widely used and has been translated into numerous languages [16,17].”
MethodThe Importance of the Built Environment in Person-Centred Rehabilitation at Home: Study Protocol
Kylén, M., von Koch, L., Pessah-Rasmussen, H., Marcheschi, E., Ytterberg, C., Heylighen, A., & Elf, M. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16132409 · Cited by 18
“A word of caution when it comes to generalizing the results to other Swedish or international groups is therefore needed.”
MethodInfluentialRondung, E., Leiler, A., Sarkadi, A., Bjärtå, A., Lampa, E., Löfving, S. G., Calam, R., Oppedal, B., Keeshin, B., & Warner, G. (2022) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-022-00998-1 · Cited by 18
“In line with our expectations, the current pilot data indicated relatively low levels of self-efficacy at preintervention compared with a Swedish cohort study [49].”
MethodResultHealth in women on long-term sick leave because of pain or mental illness
Lytsy, P., Larsson, K., & Anderzén, I. (2014) · International Journal of Rehabilitation Research · doi:10.1097/mrr.0000000000000080 · Cited by 17
“This may be compared with scores in a Swedish general population, who reported mean item scores of 2.9, and two sick-listed populations, who reported a mean item score of 2.9 and 2.8, respectively (Löve et al., 2012).”
ResultInfluentialPreparedness for family caregiving prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Winterling, J., Kisch, A. M., Alvariza, A., Årestedt, K., & Bergkvist, K. (2021) · Palliative & Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951521001346 · Cited by 16
“The GSE has shown good measurement properties in general populations (Love et al., 2012).”
BackgroundThe Role of Hope and Self-efficacy on Nurses’ Subjective Well-being
Liu, R.-M., Zeng, P., & Quan, P. (2018) · Asian Social Science · doi:10.5539/ass.v14n4p18 · Cited by 17
Blanck, E., Pirhonen, L., Fors, A., Ekman, I., Ali, L., Swedberg, K. B., & Gyllensten, H. (2023) · ESC Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ehf2.14574 · Cited by 16
“22 Respondents were asked to rate each item on a 4-point scale from 1 ( not at all true ) to 4 ( exactly true ).”
BackgroundAndersén, Å., Larsson, K., Lytsy, P., Berglund, E., Kristiansson, P., & Anderzén, I. (2018) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-017-9752-8 · Cited by 14
“The Swedish Social Insurance Agency (SSIA) identified 1305 potential participants through registry data.”
MethodInfluentialDahlin, M., Johansson, A., Romare, H., Carlbring, P., & Andersson, G. (2022) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2022.100531 · Cited by 15
“…Brief Quality of Life Scale (BBQ) to assess the perceived quality of life (Lindner et al., 2016), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) to assess self-efficacy (L ¨ ove et al., 2012), and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II) to assess psychological flexibility (Bond et al., 2011).”
Johansson, P., Lundgren, J., Andersson, G., Svensson, E., & Mourad, G. (2022) · JMIR Cardio · doi:10.2196/29926 · Cited by 15
“Self-efficacy Self-efficacy was measured using the Swedish version of the General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) [17].”
InfluentialFristedt, S., Smith, F., Grynne, A., & Browall, M. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01448-3 · Cited by 15
Telephone nurses' perceived stress, self‐efficacy and empathy in their work with frequent callers
Skogevall, S., Holmström, I. K., Kaminsky, E., & Eklund, J. H. (2021) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.889 · Cited by 18
Dahlberg, K., Stenberg, E., Liang, Y., Nilsson, U. G., & Jaensson, M. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061509 · Cited by 15
Svedell, L. A., Lidström-Holmqvist, K., Lindvall, M. A., Cao, Y., & Msghina, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2023.1133256 · Cited by 15
“Changes in self-efficacy, body awareness and physical fitness Changes in self-efficacy (GSE-10), body awareness (BAS MQE) and measures of physical capacity with handgrip strength with dynamometer and balance test are shown in Table 4, where varied changes in a positive direction could be discerned in the intervention…”
Housing Accessibility at Home and Rehabilitation Outcomes After a Stroke: An Explorative Study
Elf, M., Slaug, B., Ytterberg, C., Heylighen, A., & Kylén, M. (2023) · HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/19375867231178313 · Cited by 15
“We used the validated Swedish version of the GSE (Carlstedt et al., 2015; Lo¨ve et al., 2012).”
MethodEkhammar, A., Grimby‐Ekman, A., Bernhardsson, S., Holmgren, K. E., Bornhöft, L., Nordeman, L., & Larsson, M. E. H. (2024) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2024.2343424 · Cited by 13
“The Swedish translation of the GSE has proven to be a valid and reliable indicator of perceived general self-efficacy [47].”
Juhlin, S., Bergenheim, A., Gjertsson, I., Larsson, A., & Mannerkorpi, K. (2021) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-2796 · Cited by 12
“The Swedish version of GSES has been validated in different cohorts (25).”
MethodGaliana, L., Sánchez‐Ruiz, J., Gómez-Salgado, J. C., Larkin, P. J., & Sansó, N. (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103865 · Cited by 18
Ali, L., Krevers, B., & Skärsäter, I. (2015) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.3109/01612840.2014.1002644 · Cited by 12
Larsson-Lund, M., Lexell, E. M., & Nyman, A. (2021) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-021-00924-x · Cited by 12
Lindvall, M. A., Lidström-Holmqvist, K., Svedell, L. A., Philipson, A., Cao, Y., & Msghina, M. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05181-1 · Cited by 12
“The instrument is used internationally and has shown good internal reliability; in this study, the Swedish version of the GSES-10 will be used [61].”
MethodHidrus, A., Kueh, Y. C., Norsa’adah, B., & Kuan, G. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17030922 · Cited by 12
“Until now, the scale has been adopted on different population such as, African American and Latino elderly in United States of America [15], diabetes patients in Taiwan [16] and Swedish people [17].”
MethodLarsson, M. E. H., Nordeman, L., Holmgren, K. E., Grimby‐Ekman, A., Hensing, G. K. E., Björkelund, C., Bergman, S., Ekhammar, A., Dottori, M. G., & Bernhardsson, S. (2020) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-020-03790-5 · Cited by 11
Self-citationMilberg, A., Liljeroos, M., & Krevers, B. (2019) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-019-0446-1 · Cited by 11
The relationship between mental toughness and subjective mental illness recovery
Ramshaw, G., & Clair‐Thompson, H. S. (2021) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100881 · Cited by 11
Jaensson, M., Wätterbjörk, I., Isaksson, A., & Falk‐Brynhildsen, K. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106257 · Cited by 10
Jaensson, M., Dahlberg, K., Nilsson, U. G., & Stenberg, E. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027272 · Cited by 10
“There is also support that the GSE is unidimensional.(50)”
BackgroundStroke survivors’ preferences regarding study participation in rehabilitation research
Carlstedt, E., Lexell, E. M., Ståhl, A., Lindgren, A. G., & Iwarsson, S. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01521-z · Cited by 10
Dahlberg, K., Bylund, A., Stenberg, E., & Jaensson, M. (2022) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2022.2050458 · Cited by 10
Striberger, R., Axelsson, M., Kumlien, C., & Zarrouk, M. (2022) · Journal of Vascular Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jvn.2022.09.001 · Cited by 10
Mulhem, H. A., Alaoui, K. E., Alghamdi, A. K. H., Abdul-Rahim, M. B., Pilotti, M., & Tallouzi, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022118757915 · Cited by 10
Möller, S., Hagberg, K., Samulesson, K., & Ramstrand, N. (2017) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1306590 · Cited by 10
“The Swedish translation of the GSE scale [32] has been demonstrated as valid [10,15].”
BackgroundMethodThorgeirsdottir, L., Andersson, M., Karlsson, O., Thörn, S., Oras, J., Sengpiel, V., Svanvik, T., Elden, H., Lindén, K., Junus, K., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049559 · Cited by 10
Hermansson‐Borrebaeck, R., Fors, A., Bengtsson, U., Kjellgren, K. I., Calling, S., & Midlöv, P. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/jch.14981 · Cited by 9
Beyond the Bedside: How Moral Sensitivity and Self‐Efficacy Shape Person‐Centered Care in Nursing
Mousazadeh, N., Rezapour, M., Babaieasl, F., Nia, H. S., & Mivehchi, S. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/2823773 · Cited by 9
“Law and colleagues confrmed the validity and reliability of this scale in Sweden in 2011, reporting a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90 [38].”
InfluentialHammarberg, S. A. W., Björkelund, C., Nejati, S., Magnil, M., Hange, D., Svenningsson, I., Petersson, E., André, M., Udo, C., Ariai, N., et al. (2022) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-022-01803-x · Cited by 9
Skliarova, T., Pedersen, H., Hafstad, H., Vaag, J. R., Lara‐Cabrera, M. L., & Havnen, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1212961 · Cited by 12
“The questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency, which is in line with previous studies of the GSE-10, with Cronbach’s α values ranging from 0.78 to 0.95 (22, 24, 40, 41, 63–67).”
MethodResultInfluentialAndersén, Å., Larsson, K., Pingel, R., Kristiansson, P., & Anderzén, I. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494817717556 · Cited by 9
“The GSE has been translated into Swedish and validated [15].”
MethodHaile, S. T., Linné, A., Johansson, U., & Joelsson‐Alm, E. (2020) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-020-00437-7 · Cited by 9
Cederberg, M., Ali, L., Ekman, I., Glise, K., Jónsdóttir, I. H., Gyllensten, H., Swedberg, K. B., & Fors, A. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037515 · Cited by 9
Predictors of self-efficacy in women on long-term sick leave
Andersén, Å., Larsson, K., Lytsy, P., Kristiansson, P., & Anderzén, I. (2015) · International Journal of Rehabilitation Research · doi:10.1097/mrr.0000000000000129 · Cited by 8
“There is no definite cut-off score for GSE, but in a general population the mean was 2.9 (Schwarzer, 2011; Love et al., 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGhofranipour, F. F., Saffari, M., Mahmoudi, M., & Montazeri, A. (2013) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 8
Self-efficacy and career decision making difficulties in senior high school students
Firdaus, W., & Arjanggi, R. (2020) · Indigenous Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi · doi:10.23917/indigenous.v5i2.8941 · Cited by 8
Jong, M. C., Mulder, E., Kristoffersen, A. E., Stub, T., Dahlqvist, H. Z., Viitasara, E., Lown, E. A., Schats, W., & Jong, M. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061502 · Cited by 8
Samulowitz, A., Haukenes, I., Grimby‐Ekman, A., Bergman, S., & Hensing, G. K. E. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283222 · Cited by 8
“For instance, self-efficacy is, like self-confidence, initiative and decisiveness associated with traditional masculinity [4, 17], which may explain why men generally show higher self-efficacy than women [8, 9].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationGudmundsson, M., Pálsdóttir, A. M., Bejerholm, U., & Argentzell, E. (2025) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039488.2025.2483736 · Cited by 9
“The instrument has been found to be reliable and valid in different populations and has also shown to be associated with self-assessed mental work capacity [75].”
Brämberg, E. B., Arapovic-Johansson, B., Bültmann, U., Svedberg, P., & Bergström, G. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11786-6 · Cited by 7
“clarify how the intervention is working and is measured by a Swedish-validated version of the General selfefficacy scale [51], at baseline and at 6- and 12-month”
MethodSalud mental y factores de resiliencia durante el confinamiento por COVID-19
Fernández-Millán, J. M., & Bretones, F. D. (2021) · Universitas Psychologica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy19.smfr · Cited by 7
The self-efficacy in distress tolerance scale (SE-DT): a psychometric evaluation
Alfonsson, S., Mardula, K., Toll, C., Isaksson, M., & Wolf‐Arehult, M. (2022) · Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation · doi:10.1186/s40479-022-00195-9 · Cited by 8
“Both the original version [45] and the Swedish version [14, 36] of the GSE have been reported to have good psychometric properties.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAndreae, C., Tingström, P., Nilsson, S., Jaarsma, T., Karlsson, N. E., & Köhler, A. K. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065230 · Cited by 7
Song, H., & Nam, K. A. (2017) · International Journal of COPD · doi:10.2147/copd.s142488 · Cited by 7
Olsson, P., Pearson, K., Reimers, A., & Källén, K. (2020) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107554 · Cited by 7
Olsson, T. M., & Skoog, T. (2025) · Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/17450128.2025.2548227 · Cited by 6
“By Löve et al. (2012).”
Jong, M. C., Dahlqvist, H. Z., Lown, E. A., Schats, W., Beckman, L., & Jong, M. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16408-x · Cited by 6
“Generalized Self-Efficacy scale (GSE): A 10-item scale measuring general belief in oneself to solve problems and reach goals [56], also translated and validated in the Swedish language [57].”
BackgroundUse of Self-Efficacy Scale in Mass Casualty Incidents During Drill Exercises
Cardós-Alonso, C., Inzunza, M., Gyllencreutz, L., Ramírez, S. E., Vazquéz-Rodríguez, T., Fernandez, M. A., Blanco, A. G., & Cintora-Sanz, A. M. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11175-w · Cited by 6
“This aligns with previous research in medical education that has explored various instruments to enhance self-efficacy (cf. [53, 54, 55, 56, 57]).”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Löve, J., Moore, C. D., & Hensing, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Skidmore College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Löve, Jesper
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2011-10-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1249-1253
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2142473291
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Creative Matter (Skidmore College) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- General Self-Efficacy Scale, Swedish translation, psychometric validation, internal consistency, factor structure, convergent validity, sick leave, work capacity, mental work capacity, physical work capacity, gender differences, self-efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Sweden, Work Capacity Evaluation, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Sick Leave, Self Efficacy, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review