The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The KIDSCREEN questionnaires were developed by a collaborative effort of European pediatric researchers for use in epidemiologic public health surveys, clinical intervention studies, and research projects. The article gives an overview of the development of the tool, summarizes its extensive applications in Europe, and describes the development of a new computerized adaptive test (KIDS-CAT) based on KIDSCREEN experiences. METHODS: The KIDSCREEN versions (self-report and proxy versions with 52, 27, and 10 items) were simultaneously developed in 13 different European countries to warrant cross-cultural applicability, using methods based on classical test theory (CTT: descriptive statistics, CFA and MAP, internal consistency, retest reliability measures) and item response theory (IRT: Rasch modeling, DIF analyses, etc.). The KIDS-CAT was developed (in cooperation with the US pediatric PROMIS project) based on archival data of European KIDSCREEN health surveys using IRT more extensively (IRC). RESULTS: Research has shown that the KIDSCREEN is a reliable, valid, sensitive, and conceptually/linguistically appropriate QoL measure in 38 countries/languages by now. European and national norm data are available. New insights from KIDSCREEN studies stimulate pediatric health care. Based on KIDSCREEN, the Kids-CAT promises to facilitate a very efficient, precise, as well as reliable and valid assessment of QoL. CONCLUSIONS: The KIDSCREEN has standardized QoL measurement in Europe in children as a valid and cross-cultural comparable tool. The Kids-CAT has the potential to further advance pediatric health measurement and care via Internet application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · Cited by 5,128
Self-citationThe PedsQL™: Measurement Model for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory
Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Rode, C. A. (1999) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199902000-00003 · Cited by 3,291
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Rose, M. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55 · Cited by 3,118
Self-citationDevelopment of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D
Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., Devlin, N., Egmar, A.-C., Greiner, W., Gusi, N., Herdman, M., et al. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9648-y · Cited by 872
Self-citationAdolescent quality of life, Part II: initial validation of a new instrument
PATRICK, D. L., EDWARDS, T. C., & TOPOLSKI, T. D. (2002) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1006/jado.2002.0471 · Cited by 260
Cited by
Nobari, H., Fashi, M., Eskandari, A., Villafaina, S., Murillo-Garcia, Á., & Pérez-Gómez, J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18094563 · Cited by 204
Krause, K. R., Chung, S., Adewuya, A. O., Albano, A. M., Babins-Wagner, R., Birkinshaw, L., Brann, P., Creswell, C., Delaney, K., Falissard, B., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30356-4 · Cited by 162
Self-citationEddolls, W. T. B., McNarry, M. A., Lester, L., Winn, C. O. N., Stratton, G., & Mackintosh, K. A. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1915-3 · Cited by 124
Telecommunication devices use, screen time and sleep in adolescents
Cabré-Riera, A., Torrent, M., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Vrijheid, M., Cardis, E., & Guxens, M. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.036 · Cited by 115
Bunketorp Käll, L., Malmgren, H., Olsson, E., Lindén, T., & Nilsson, M. (2015) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.12303 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravens-Sieberer, U., Herdman, M., Devine, J., Otto, C., Bullinger, M., Rose, M., & Klasen, F.
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2013-05-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 791-803
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2054053084
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 45.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3
- The paper
- Ravens-Sieberer, U., Herdman, M., Devine, J., Otto, C., Bullinger, M., Rose, M., & Klasen, F. (2014). The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.