Cited by 260Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeHealth Education and ValidationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Adolescent quality of life, Part II: initial validation of a new instrument

PATRICK, DONALD L., EDWARDS, TODD C., TOPOLSKI, TARI D.·2002·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Research Version (YQOL-R) perceptual module are presented. Self-reports were obtained from 236 youth aged 12-18 years with mobility disability, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, or without self-reported chronic conditions. Item and factor analyses confirmed the hypothesized conceptual model derived from previous qualitative research. The scales of the YQOL-R showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.77-0.96), reproducibility (ICCs=0.74-0.85), expected associations with other constructs, and ability to distinguish between known groups. The YQOL-R showed sufficient validity to encourage further use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jado.2002.0471

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PATRICK, D. L., EDWARDS, T. C., & TOPOLSKI, T. D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
287-300
ISSN
0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966782848
Cited by
260
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
psychometric validation, self-report measures, mobility impairment, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, chronic disease, internal consistency, reproducibility, factor structure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Washington, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review