Cited by 29Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Within- and cross-language contributions of morphological awareness to word reading and vocabulary in Chinese–English bilingual learners

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11145-017-9771-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Chinese receptive vocabulary test (adapted PPVT-4) has been used among Hong Kong children many times before and has shown good psychometric properties.

    “This test has been used among Hong Kong children many times before, and good psychometric properties have been shown (e.g., Tong et al., 2018a).”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 169–190. · DOI
  2. Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487. doi: 10.1598/rrq.45.4.5 . · DOI
  3. Carlisle, J. F., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Ceccagno, A., & Basciano, B. (2007). Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms. Morphology, 17(2), 207–231. doi: 10.1007/s11525-008-9119-0 . · DOI
  5. Chen, X., Hao, M., Geva, E., Zhu, J., & Shu, H. (2009). The role of compound awareness in Chinese children’s vocabulary acquisition and character reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 615–631. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9127-9 . · DOI
  6. Chow, B. W. Y., McBride-Chang, C., & Burgess, S. (2005). Phonological processing skills and early reading abilities in Hong Kong Chinese kindergartners learning to read English as a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 81–87. · DOI
  7. Chow, B. W. Y., McBride-Chang, C., Cheung, H., & Chow, C. S. L. (2008). Dialogic reading and morphology training in Chinese children: Effects on language and literacy. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 233–244. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.233 . · DOI
  8. Chung, K. K., McBride-Chang, C., Wong, S. W., Cheung, H., Penney, T. B., & Ho, C. S. H. (2008). The role of visual and auditory temporal processing for Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Annals of dyslexia, 58(1), 15–35. · DOI
  9. Chung, W. L., & Hu, C. F. (2007). Morphological awareness and learning to read Chinese. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 441–461. · DOI
  10. Cummins, J. (2005). Teaching for cross-language transfer in dual language education: Possibilities and pitfalls. In TESOL Symposium on dual language education: Teaching and learning two languages in the EFL setting (pp. 1–18).
  11. Deacon, S. H., Benere, J., & Pasquarella, A. (2013). Reciprocal relationship: Children’s morphological awareness and their reading accuracy across grades 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1113–1126. doi: 10.1037/a0029474 . · DOI
  12. Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223–238. doi: 10.1017/s0142716404001110 . · DOI · Paper page
  13. Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. (2007). Crossover: The role of morphological awareness in French immersion children’s reading. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 732–746. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.732 . · DOI
  14. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  15. Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 453–465. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453 . · DOI · Paper page
  16. Education Department. (1986). Hong Kong supplement to guide to the Standard Progressive Matrices. Hong Kong: Education Department.
  17. Gottardo, A., Yan, B., Siegel, L. S., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 530–542. · DOI
  18. Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D., Chung, K., Tsang, S.-M., Lee, S.-H., & Cheng, R. W.-Y. (2007). The Hong Kong test of specific learning difficulties in reading and writing for primary school students-second edition [HKT-P(II)]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Specific Learning Difficulties Research Team.
  19. Keung, Y.-C., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2008). Transfer of reading-related cognitive skills in learning to read Chinese (L1) and English (L2) among Chinese elementary school children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 103–112. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62(4), 1170–1204. · DOI
  21. Koda, K. (2000). Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(3), 297–320. doi: 10.1017/s0142716400003015 . · DOI
  22. Koda, K. (2005). Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second language reading development. In V. J. Cook (Ed.), Second language writing systems (pp. 311–334). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. · DOI
  23. Ku, Y.-M., & Anderson, R. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing, 16(5), 399–422. doi: 10.1023/A:1024227231216 . · DOI
  24. Liu, P. D., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). What is morphological awareness? Tapping lexical compounding awareness in Chinese third graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 62–73. doi: 10.1037/a0016933 . · DOI
  25. Luo, Y. C., Chen, X., & Geva, E. (2014). Concurrent and longitudinal cross-linguistic transfer of phonological awareness and morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilingual children. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 89–115. doi: 10.1075/wll.17.1.05luo . · DOI · Paper page
  26. McBride-Chang, C., Cheung, H., Chow, B. Y., Chow, C. L., & Choi, L. (2006). Metalinguistic skills and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese (L1) and English (L2). Reading and Writing, 19(7), 695–716. doi: 10.1007/s11145-005-5742-x . · DOI
  27. McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J. R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., et al. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(2), 140–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.009 . · DOI
  28. McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Wat, C. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 743–751. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.743 . · DOI · Paper page
  29. McBride-Chang, C., Tardif, T., Cho, J. R., Shu, H. U. A., Fletcher, P., Stokes, S. F., et al. (2008). What’s in a word? Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in three languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 437–462. doi: 10.1017/s014271640808020x . · DOI
  30. Ramirez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E., & Kiefer, H. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. Reading and Writing, 23(3–4), 337–358. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9 . · DOI · Paper page
  31. Ramirez, G., Walton, P., & Roberts, W. (2014). Morphological awareness and vocabulary development among kindergarteners with different ability levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 54–64. doi: 10.1177/0022219413509970 . · DOI
  32. Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S., & Liu, H. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia: Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 122–133. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.122 . · DOI
  33. Sparks, E., & Deacon, S. H. (2015). Morphological awareness and vocabulary acquisition: A longitudinal examination of their relationship in English-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 299–321. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000246 . · DOI
  34. Tong, X., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). Chinese–English biscriptal reading: Cognitive component skills across orthographies. Reading and Writing, 23(3–4), 293–310. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9211-9 . · DOI
  35. Tong, X., McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., & Wong, A. M. (2009). Morphological awareness, orthographic knowledge, and spelling errors: Keys to understanding early Chinese literacy acquisition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(5), 426–452. · DOI
  36. Tong, X., Tong, X., & McBride, C. (2016). Unpacking the relation between morphological awareness and Chinese word reading: Levels of morphological awareness and vocabulary. Contemporary Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.07.003 . · DOI
  37. Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R. (Eds.). (2007). Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension. New York: The Guilford Press.
  38. Wang, M., Cheng, C., & Chen, S. W. (2006). Contribution of morphological awareness to Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 542–553. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.542 . · DOI · Paper page
  39. Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition: Cross-language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97(1), 67–88. · DOI
  40. Zhou, Y. L., McBride-Chang, C., Fong, C. Y. C., Wong, T. T. Y., & Cheung, S. K. (2012). A comparison of phonological awareness, lexical compounding, and homophone training for Chinese word reading in Hong Kong kindergartners. Early Education & Development, 23(4), 475–492. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2010.530478 . · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tong, X., McBride, C., Ho, C. S.-H., Waye, M. M. Y., Chung, K. K. H., Wong, S. W. L., & Chow, B. W. Y.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
McBride, Catherine
Venue
Reading and Writing
Published
2017-08-29
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1765-1786
ISSN
  • 0922-4777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0905
OpenAlex
W2751856144
Cited by
29
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading and Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
morphological awareness, word reading, vocabulary knowledge, Chinese-English bilingualism, phonological awareness, cross-language transfer, second language acquisition, Chinese as a second language, English as a second language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review