The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus statement from 2nd International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D
Open accessAbstract
The 2 nd International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D was held in Monteriggioni (Siena), Italy, September 11-14, 2018. The aim of this meeting was to address ongoing controversies and timely topics in vitamin D research, to review available data related to these topics and controversies, to promote discussion to help resolve lingering issues and ultimately to suggest a research agenda to clarify areas of uncertainty. Several issues from the first conference, held in 2017, were revisited, such as assays used to determine serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration, which remains a critical and controversial issue for defining vitamin D status. Definitions of vitamin D nutritional status (i.e. sufficiency, insufficiency and deficiency) were also revisited. New areas were reviewed, including vitamin D threshold values and how they should be defined in the context of specific diseases, sources of vitamin D and risk factors associated with vitamin D deficiency. Non-skeletal aspects related to vitamin D were also discussed, including the reproductive system, neurology, chronic kidney disease and falls. The therapeutic role of vitamin D and findings from recent clinical trials were also addressed. The topics were considered by 3 focus groups and divided into three main areas: 1) “Laboratory”: assays and threshold values to define vitamin D status; 2) “Clinical”: sources of vitamin D and risk factors and role of vitamin D in non-skeletal disease and 3) “Therapeutics”: controversial issues on observational studies and recent randomized controlled trials. In this report, we present a summary of our findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
Fetal origins of coronary heart disease
Barker, D. J. P. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6998.171 · Cited by 3,570
Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons
Society, A. G., Society, G., Of, A. A., & On Falls Prevention, O. S. P. (2001) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x · Cited by 2,242
Demographic Differences and Trends of Vitamin D Insufficiency in the US Population, 1988-2004
Ginde, A. A., Liu, M. C., & Camargo, C. A. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.604 · Cited by 1,120
Beaudart, C., Buckinx, F., Rabenda, V., Gillain, S., Cavalier, E., Slomian, J., Petermans, J., Reginster, J.-Y., & Bruyère, O. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2014-1742 · Cited by 676
Intestinal Permeability Defects: Is It Time to Treat?
Odenwald, M. A., & Turner, J. R. (2013) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.001 · Cited by 366
Ultraviolet radiation and the skin: Photobiology and sunscreen photoprotection
Young, A. R., Claveau, J., & Rossi, A. B. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.09.038 · Cited by 339
Nikooyeh, B., Neyestani, T. R., Farvid, M., Alavi-Majd, H., Houshiarrad, A., Kalayi, A., Shariatzadeh, N., Gharavi, A., Heravifard, S., Tayebinejad, N., et al. (2011) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.110.007336 · Cited by 277
Vitamin D as a neurosteroid affecting the developing and adult brain
Groves, N. J., McGrath, J. J., & Burne, T. H. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071813-105557 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Consensus statement on vitamin D status assessment and supplementation: Whys, whens, and hows
Giustina, A., Bilezikian, J. P., Adler, R. A., Banfi, G., Bikle, D. D., Binkley, N. C., Bollerslev, J., Bouillon, R., Brandi, M. L., Casanueva, F. F., et al. (2024) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnae009 · Cited by 392
Self-citationRips, L., Toom, A., Kuik, R., Varblane, A., Mölder, H., Tammaru, M., Kull, M., Ööpik, V., Kartus, J.-T., Gapeyeva, H., et al. (2022) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1080/15502783.2022.2100718 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Giustina, A., Adler, R. A., Binkley, N., Bollerslev, J., Bouillon, R., Dawson-Hughes, B., Ebeling, P. R., Feldman, D., Formenti, A. M., Lazaretti-Castro, M., Marcocci, C., Rizzoli, R., Sempos, C. T., & Bilezikian, J. P.
- Venue
- Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-116
- ISSN
- 1389-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2606
- OpenAlex
- W3011325973
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 27.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus statement from 2nd International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11154-019-09532-w
- The paper
- Giustina, A., Adler, R. A., Binkley, N., Bollerslev, J., Bouillon, R., Dawson-Hughes, B., Ebeling, P. R., Feldman, D., Formenti, A. M., Lazaretti-Castro, M., Marcocci, C., Rizzoli, R., Sempos, C. T., & Bilezikian, J. P. (2020). Consensus statement from 2nd International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-019-09532-w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
