The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FACTORS INFLUENCING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ DECISIONS TO CHEAT BY TYPE OF ASSESSMENT
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“TPB has been widely applied to academic integrity behaviours such as cheating and plagiarism (e.g. Passow et al. 2006; Stone, Jawahar, and Kisamore 2009; Imran and Nordin 2013; Khathayut, Walker-Gleaves, and Humble 2022).”
From Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Passow et al. 2006
In the citing paper
“This study reaffirms the influence of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on students' intentions to comply, aligning with the TPB framework (Ajzen 1991; Passow et al. 2006; Khathayut, Walker-Gleaves, and Humble 2022).”
From Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Passow et al. 2006
In the citing paper
“By comparison, other activity involvement (64.1% of the sample) did not load as a predictor.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Passow, Mayhew, Finelli, Harding, and Carpenter (2006)
In the citing paper
“Finally, Passow, Mayhew, Finelli, Harding, and Carpenter (2006) found fraternity/sorority membership (18.9% of the sample) predicted exam cheating among engineering students (n = 643 undergraduates at 11 institutions) but not homework cheating.”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Passow, Mayhew, Finelli, Harding, and Carpenter (2006)
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Southwestern Social Science Association (2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/(issn)1540-6237 · Cited by 13,619
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1
Ajzen, I. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x · Cited by 7,629
Payne, G., Dingwall, R. W. J., Payne, J., & Carter, M. (1981) · Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · Cited by 5,015
Cohen, D. (1998) · The Women s Review of Books · doi:10.2307/4022859 · Cited by 4,321
Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x · Cited by 3,344
Science and Engineering Indicators
Washington, E., & Warren, M. E. (2004) · Cited by 2,822
(1975) · Sociological Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0038022919750111 · Cited by 1,946
Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1103_2 · Cited by 1,379
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bowers W. J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College. Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, New York
- Hanson, A. C. (1990). Academic dishonesty: The impact of student and institutional characteristics on cheating behavior [Abstract] (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51:89
- Moore, R. E. (1996). Impact of ABET on curriculum content and academic standards. Paper presented at the 1996 98th Annual Meeting and the Ceramic Manufacturing Council’s Workshop and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Ratner, J. (1996). Academic dishonesty and moral development: Theory revisited. [Abstract] (Doctoral dissertation: Columbia University Teachers College, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(07), 2902
- Spiller M. S., Crown D. F. (1995). Changes over time in academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business 68(4): 207–211
- Tang S., Zuo J. (1997). Profile of college examination cheaters. College Student Journal 31:340–346
- Tibbetts, S. G. (1997). College student perceptions of utility and intentions of test cheating (Academic dishonesty) [Abstract] (Doctoral dissertation: University of Maryland College Park, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(06A), 2400
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–201 of 201
Khlaif, Z. N., Hamamra, B. T., Farran, H. K., & Salama, N. (2026) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-026-09768-7
Metadata
- Authors
- Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
- Kettering University (US)
- Lawrence Technological University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Finelli, Cynthia J.
- Venue
- Research in Higher Education
- Published
- 2006-04-19
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-684
- ISSN
- 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-188X
- OpenAlex
- W2104524267
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 15.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
- Keywords
- academic dishonesty, engineering students, theory of planned behavior, exam cheating, assessment types, moral obligation, attitudes toward cheating, perceived social pressure, student stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
