Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,834

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship

Open access
Acs, Zoltan J., Braunerhjelm, Pontus, Audretsch, David B., Carlsson, Bo·2009·Small Business Economics
DOI 10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Contemporary theories of entrepreneurship generally focus on the recognition of opportunities and the decision to exploit them. Although the entrepreneurship literature treats opportunities as exogenous, the prevailing theory of economic growth suggests they are endogenous. This paper advances the microeconomic foundations of endogenous growth theory by developing a knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Knowledge created endogenously results in knowledge spillovers, which allow entrepreneurs to identify and exploit opportunities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1994b). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336–340. · DOI
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, 78, 678–690.
  3. Anton, J. J., & Yao, D. A. (1994). Expropriation and inventions: Appropriable rents in the absence of property rights. The American Economic Review, 84, 190–209.
  4. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity. NJ: Princeton University Press and NBER.
  5. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
  6. Baumol, W. J. (2004). Entrepreneurial enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth machine. Small Business Economics, 23, 9–21. · DOI
  7. Bhide, A. (1994). How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work. Harvard Business Review, 72, 150–161.
  8. Blau, D. M. (1987). A time-series analysis of self-employment in the United States. The Journal of Political Economy, 95, 445–467. · DOI
  9. Braunerhjelm, P., & Svensson, R. (2008). The inventor’s role: Was Schumpeter right? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, forthcoming. · DOI
  10. Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A.-C. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 199–232. · DOI
  11. Dinopoulos, E. (1996). Schumpeterian growth theory: An overview. In E. Helmstädter & M. Perlman (Eds.), Behavioral norms, technological progress and economic dynamics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  12. Gancia, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2005). Horizontal innovation in the theory of growth and development. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. North Holland, Amsterdam: New York Elsevier.
  13. Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S., Crespi, G., Francoz, D., Gambardella, A., et al. (2007). Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy, 36, 1107–1127. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Griliches, Z. (1986). Productivity, R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s. The American Economic Review, 76, 141–154.
  16. Hébert, R. F., & Albert, N. (1982). The entrepreneur: Mainstream views and radical critiques. New York: Praeger.
  17. Hellmann, T. (2007). When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Science, 53, 919–933. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Henrekson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship: A weak link in the welfare state? Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 437–467. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Howitt, P. (1999). Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hvide, H. K. (2006). Firm size and the quality of entrepreneurs. Economic Journal, in press.
  21. Intriligator, M. D. (1971). Mathematical optimization and economic theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.
  22. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. NY, USA: Random House.
  23. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Jones, C. I. (1995). R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759–784. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Jorgenson, D. W. (2001). Information technology and the US economy. The American Economic Review, 91, 1–32. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Entrepreneurship and competition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  27. Klapper, L., Amit, R., Guillén, M. F., & Quesada, J. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. Development Research Group Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 649–680. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Michelacci, C. (2003). Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. The Economic Journal, 113, 207–225. · DOI
  31. Moen, J. (2005). Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers? Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 81–114. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S., & Boylaud, O. (2000). Summary indicators of product market regulation with an extension to employment protection legislation. Concepts and measurement of labour markets flexibility/adaptability indicators. Paris: OECD Economics Department. · DOI
  33. Pakes, A., & Nitzan, S. (1983). Optimum contracts for research personnel, research employment, and the establishment of “Rival” Enterprises. Journal of Labor Economics, 1, 345–365. · DOI
  34. Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Romer, P. M. (1996). Why, indeed, in America? Theory, history, and the origins of modern economic growth. The American Economic Review, 86, 202–206.
  36. Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. The American Economic Review, 55, 1097–1125.
  37. Schumpeter, J. (1911 [1934]). The theory of economic development, New York: Oxford University Press.
  38. Segerstrom, P. S., Anant, T. C. A., & Dinopoulos, E. (1990). A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. The American Economic Review, 80, 1077–1091.
  39. Shackle, G. L. S. (1982). Foreword. In R. F. Hebert & A. Link (Eds.), The entrepreneur: Mainstream views and radical critiques. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  40. Shane, S. (2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47, 205–220. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review, 95, 450–460. · DOI · Paper page
  42. von Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, 4, 33–54. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of us biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.

Cited by

See all 1,834

Metadata

Authors
Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B.
Venue
Small Business Economics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-12-13
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
15-30
ISSN
  • 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0913
DOI
10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
OpenAlex
W3124839039
Cited by
1,834
References
11
FWCI
98.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.