CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21Migration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFirm Innovation and GrowthEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Innovation in immigrant-owned firms

Ostrovsky, Yuri, Picot, Garnett·2021·Small Business Economics
DOI 10.1007/s11187-020-00376-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11187-020-00376-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235–267. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Acs, Z. J., Groot, H. L., & Nijkamp, P. (2002). Innovation and regional development. In Acs et al. (Eds.), The emergence of the knowledge economy. Berlin: Springer. · DOI
  3. Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Managemenet, 27(5), 725–740. · DOI
  4. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2713–2739). Elsevier. · DOI
  5. Baldwin, J. R. (1995). Innovation: the key to success in small firms. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch, Research Paper no. 76.
  6. Baldwin, J. R., & Hanel, P. (2003). Innovation and knowledge creation in an open economy: Canadian industry and international implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  7. Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009). cem: coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(4), 524–546. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Blit, J., Skuterud, M., & Zhang, J. (2018). An analysis of the patenting rates of Canada’s ethnic populations. Canadian Public Policy, 44(S1), S125–S145.
  9. Blit, J., Skuterud, M., & Zhang, J. (2019). Immigration and innovation: evidence from Canadian cities. Journal of Economic Geography forthcoming. · DOI
  10. Brown, J. D., Earle, J. S., Kim, M. J., & Lee, K. M. (2019). Immigrant entrepreneurs and innovation in the U.S. High-Tech Sector. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics, IZA DP no. 12190. · DOI
  11. Chen, S. (2017). A relationship between innovation and firm performance: a literature review. Advances in Computer Science Research, Vol. 82. Atlantis Press.
  12. Cho, H.-J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555–575. · DOI
  13. De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2009). Innovative firms or innovative owners? Determinants of innovation in micro, small, and medium enterprises. Bonn: IZA Institute for Labor Research, IZA DP No. 3962.
  14. Green, D., Liu, H., Ostrovsky, Y., & Picot, G. (2016). Immigration, business ownership and employment in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada: Analytical Studies Branch No. 375.
  15. Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662–676. · DOI
  16. Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal analysis: a multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20, 25–46. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199–236. · DOI
  18. Hunt, J., & Gauthier-Loiselle, M. (2010). How much does immigration boost innovation? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 31–56.
  19. Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2011). Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106, 345–361. · DOI
  20. Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20, 1–24. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 4–29. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kerr, W. R. (2013). US high-skilled immigration, innovation, and entrepreneurship: empirical approaches and evidence. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER paper no. 19377. · DOI
  23. Kerr, W. R., & Lincoln, W. F. (2010). The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and US ethnic invention. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(3), 473–508. · DOI
  24. Kleinknecht, A., & Mohen, P. (2002). Innovation and firm performance: econometric exploration of survey data. New York: Palgrave. · DOI
  25. Lee, F., & Has, H. (1996). A quantitative assessment of high-knowledge industries versus low-knowledge industries. In P. Howitt (Ed.), The implications of knowledge-based growth for micro-economic policies (Vols. 6, Industry Canada research series). Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
  26. Lileeva, A., & Trefler, D. (2010). Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity… for some plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3). · DOI · Paper page
  27. OECD Oslo Manual. (2018). Guidlines for collecting, reporting, and using data on innovation. Paris: OECD.
  28. Ostrovsky, Y., Picot, G., & Leung, D. (2019). The financing of immigrant-owned firms in Canada. Small Business Economics, 52(1), 303–317. · DOI
  29. Prajogo, D. I. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance--a comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 218–225. · DOI
  30. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Salavou, H. (2002). Profitability in market-oriented SME’s: does product innovation matter? European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 164–171. · DOI
  32. Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1–21. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Ostrovsky, Y., & Picot, G.
Affiliations
  • Statistics Canada (CA)
  • Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Ostrovsky, Yuri
  • Picot, Garnett
ORCID
Ostrovsky, Yuri
Venue
Small Business Economics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-07-11
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
1857-1874
ISSN
  • 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0913
DOI
10.1007/s11187-020-00376-2
OpenAlex
W3041316165
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Small Business Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Keywords
innovation, small and medium-sized enterprises, product innovation, process innovation, organizational innovation, marketing innovation, intellectual property, patents, trademarks, industrial design, trade secrets, non-disclosure agreements, Canadian firms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review