Cited by 72scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsAcademic Writing and Publishing

Weak evidence for determinants of citation frequency in ecological articles

Padial, André Andrian, Nabout, João Carlos, Siqueira, Tadeu, Bini, Luis Mauricio, Diniz-Filho, José Alexandre Felizola·2010·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-010-0231-7

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padial, A. A., Nabout, J. C., Siqueira, T., Bini, L. M., & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia do Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
Corresponding author
Padial, André Andrian
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2010-05-07
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2071808227
Cited by
72
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
citation counts, ecological literature, information theory, competing hypotheses, number of authors, article length, citation bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review