CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Gender Roles and Identity StudiesGender, Sexuality, and EducationPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender-Typed Behaviors and School Adjustment

Ueno, Koji, McWilliams, Summer·2010·Sex Roles
DOI 10.1007/s11199-010-9839-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-010-9839-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence

    Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · cited 4×

    “School adjustment is shaped by students’ individual attributes such as race and socioeconomic background (Johnson et al. 2001; Ladd and Dinella 2009) as well as contextual factors such as classroom and school characteristics ( Fredricks et al. 2004; Johnson et al. 2001; Moody and White 2003).”
    BackgroundInfluential

  • Multiple Imputation of Missing Values

    Royston, P. (2004) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0400400301 · Cited by 2,340 · cited 1×

    “About7.0%ofthestudentshaddatamissingfromoneormore variables. To include all respondents, we imputed the variables from the Waves 1 and 2 using the “ice” command in Stata 9.2 ( Royston 2004 ).”
    MethodInfluential

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Auster, C. J., & Ohm, S. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499–528. · DOI
  2. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cahill, S. E. (1986). Language practices and self definition: The case of gender identity acquisition. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 295–311. · DOI
  5. Cleveland, H. H., Udry, J. R., & Chantala, K. (2001). Environmental and genetic influences on sex-typed behaviors and attitudes of male and female adolescents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1587–1598. · DOI
  6. Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: Free Press.
  7. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154–165. · DOI
  9. Eder, D., Evans, C. C., & Parker, S. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  10. Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 40–66. · DOI
  11. Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340. · DOI
  12. Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Thaden, L. L. (2006). Gendered patterns in adolescents’ school attachment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 284–295. · DOI
  13. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 306–312. · DOI
  14. Kreiger, T. C., & Dumka, L. E. (2006). The relationships between hypergender, gender, and psychological adjustment. Sex Roles, 54, 777–785. · DOI
  15. Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 190–206. · DOI
  16. Lasane, T. P., Howard, W. L., Czopp, A. M., Sweigard, P. N., Bennett, G. G., & Carvajal, F. (1999). Hypermasculinity and academic goal-setting: An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 85, 487–496. · DOI
  17. Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. The Journal of School Health, 74, 274–283. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and National Merit Test Performance: “Feminine” boys and “masculine” girls tend to do better. In L. Ellis & L. Ebertz (Eds.), Males, females, and behavior: Toward biological understanding (pp. 177–193). Westport: Praeger.
  19. Lippa, R., & Connelly, S. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1051–1065. · DOI
  20. Lombardo, W. K., Cretser, G. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2001). For crying out loud: The differences persist into the 90 s. Sex Roles, 45, 529–547. · DOI
  21. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14, 327–355. · DOI
  22. Maccoby, E. E. (1966). The differences in intellectual functioning. Standord, CA: Stanford University Press.
  23. Maccoby, E. E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006–1017. · DOI
  24. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  25. Martin, C. L. (1990). Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles. Sex Roles, 22, 151–165. · DOI
  26. McCormack, M. (2010). Changing masculinities in youth cultures. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 111–115. · DOI
  27. McKelvie, M., & Gold, S. R. (1994). Hyperfemininity: Further definition of the construct. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 219–228. · DOI
  28. Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191. · DOI
  29. Mischel, W. (1966). A social-learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 56–81). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  30. Morgan, B. L. (1998). A three generational study of tomboy behavior. Sex Roles, 39, 787–800. · DOI
  31. Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127. · DOI
  32. Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163. · DOI
  33. Murnen, S. K., & Byrne, D. (1991). Hyperfemininity: Measurement and initial validation of the construct. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 479–489. · DOI
  34. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag. Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkley: University of California Press. · DOI
  35. Payne, E. C. (2007). Heterosexism, perfection, and popularity: Young lesbians’ experiences of the high school social scene. Educational Studies: Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 41, 60–60. · DOI
  36. Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016. · DOI
  37. Quatman, T., Sokolik, E., & Smith, K. (2000). Adolescent perception of peer success: A gendered perspective over time. Sex Roles, 43, 61–84. · DOI
  38. Risman, B. J., & Seale, E. (2009). Betwixt and between: Gender contradictions among middle schoolers. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 340–361). New York: Norton.
  39. Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295. · DOI
  40. Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228. · DOI
  41. Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.
  42. Smith, G. W. (1998). The ideology of “fag”: The school experience of gay students. Sociological Quarterly, 39, 309–335. · DOI
  43. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. · DOI
  44. StataCorp. (2005). Stata survey data reference manual, release 9. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
  45. Stockard, J. (1999). Gender socialization. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 215–227). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  46. Swearer, S. M., Turner, R. K., Givens, J. E., & Pollack, W. S. (2008). “You’re so gay!”: Do different forms of bullying matter for adolescent males? School Psychology Review, 37, 160–173. · DOI
  47. Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366. · DOI
  48. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
  49. Udry, J. R., & Chantala, K. (2004). Masculinity-femininity guides sexual union formation in adolescents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 44–55. · DOI
  50. Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 294–318. · DOI
  51. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
  53. Young, R., & Sweeting, H. (2004). Adolescent bullying, relationships, psychological well-being, and gender-atypical behavior: A gender diagnosticity approach. Sex Roles, 50, 525–537. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Ueno, K., & McWilliams, S.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ueno, Koji
ORCID
Ueno, Koji
Venue
Sex Roles
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-07-28
Volume
63
Issue
7-8
Pages
580-591
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
DOI
10.1007/s11199-010-9839-6
OpenAlex
W2091430242
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
gendered behavior, school adjustment, school engagement, school attachment, gender stigma, peer relationships, teacher-student relationship, middle and high school students, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review