Cited by 550Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionWorkplace Health and Well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The ‘What’, ‘Why’ and ‘How’ of Employee Well-Being: A New Model

Page, Kathryn M., Vella-Brodrick, Dianne A.·2009·Social Indicators Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-008-9270-3

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
441-458
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W1970095745
Cited by
550
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
employee well-being, mental health, subjective well-being, psychological well-being, organisational well-being, employee turnover, employee performance, strengths model, psychological assessment, well-being measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review