CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Numerical Modeling of the Largest Terrestrial Meteorite Craters

Ivanov, B. A.·2005·Solar System Research
DOI 10.1007/s11208-005-0051-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11208-005-0051-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under the initial assumption of original form, the Vredefort/Sudbury pattern is consistent with the model assumption that structural uplift participates in forming an inner topographic ring, as suggested by hydrocode calculations.

    “Under the basic initial assumption of the original form of these structures, this is consistent with the model assumption that structural uplift is an intimate participant in the physical process(es) that result in an inner topographic ring, as suggested by recent hydrocode calculations (e.g., Collins et al. 2002;Ivanov 2005).”

    From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Ivanov 2005

  • In hydrocode models, inwardly collapsed transient cavity rim units largely dip toward the center and are overridden by units from collapsed structural uplift to form the inner ring.

    “In the hydrocode models (e.g., Collins et al. 2002;Ivanov 2005), the inwardly collapsed transient cavity rim units largely dip towards the center of the structure and are overridden by units from the collapsed structural uplift to form the inner ring.”

    From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Ivanov 2005

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 109

  1. Abramov, O. and Kring, D.A., Numerical Modeling of an Impact-Induced Hydrothermal System at the Sudbury Crater, J. Geophys. Res. (Planets), 2004, vol. 109, p. 10007. · DOI
  2. Alvarez, L.W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., et al., Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction, Science, 1980, vol. 208, pp. 1095–1108. · DOI
  3. Amsden, A.A., Ruppel, H.M., and Hirt, C.W., SALE: A Simplified ALE Computer Program for Fluid Flow at All Speeds, Los Alamos: Los Alamos Laboratory Report LA-8095, 1980. · DOI
  4. Ariskin, A.A., Deutsch, A., and Ostermann, M., Sudbury Igneous Complex: Simulating Phase Equilibria and in Situ Differentiation for Two Proposed Parental Magmas, in Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution II, Dressler, B.O., and Sharpton, V.L., Eds., Boulder: Geological Soc. Am., 1999, pp. 373–387.
  5. Barsukov, V.L., Venusian Igneous Rocks, in Venus geology, geochemistry, and geophysics-Research results from the USSR, Barsukov, V.L., Basilevsky, A.T., Volkov, V.P., et al., Eds., Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press, 1992, pp. 165–176.
  6. Bottomley, R., Grieve, R., York, D., et al., The Age of the Popigai Impact Event and Its Relation To Events at the Eocene/Oligocene Boundary, Nature, 1997, vol. 388, pp. 365–368. · DOI
  7. Bralower, T.J., Paull, C.K., and Leckie, R.M., The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Cocktail: Chicxulub Impact Triggers Margin Collapse, Geology, 1998, vol. 26, no.4, pp. 331–334. · DOI
  8. Christeson, G.L., Nakamura, Y., Buffler, R.T., et al., Deep Crustal Structure of the Chicxulub Impact Crater, J. Geophys. Res., 2001, vol. 106, pp. 21751–21770. · DOI
  9. Collins, G.S., Melosh, H.J., and Ivanov, B.A., Modeling Damage and Deformation in Impact Simulations, Met. Plan. Sci, 2004, vol. 39, no.2, pp. 217–231. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dahlman, O. and Israelson, H., Monitoring Underground Nuclear Explosions, New York: Elsevier, 1977.
  11. De Wit, M.J., Roering, C., Hart, R.J., et al., Formation of An Archean Continent, Nature, 1992, vol. 357, pp. 553–562. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Deutsch, A. and Grieve, R.A.F., The Sudbury Structure: Constraints on Its Genesis from Lithoprobe Results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1994, vol. 21, pp. 963–966. · DOI
  13. Deutsch, A., Grieve, R.A.F., Avermann, M., et al., The Sudbury Structure (Ontario, Canada): a Tectonically Deformed Multi-Ring Impact Basin, Geol. Rundsch., 1995, vol. 84, no.4, pp. 697–709. · DOI
  14. Deutsch, A., Masaitis, V.L., Langenhorst, F., et al., Popigai, Siberia-Well Preserved Giant Impact Structure, National Treasury, and World'S Geological Heritage, Episodes, 2000, vol. 23, no.1, pp. 3–11. · DOI
  15. Dines, J. and Walsh, J., Impact Theory: General Principles and Method of Calculation in Euler Coordinates, in Vysokoskorostnye udarnye yavleniya (High-Speed Impact Phenomena), Moscow: Mir, 1973, pp. 49–111.
  16. Donofrio, R.R., North American Impact Structures Hold Giant Field Potential, Oil Gas J., 1998, no. 5, pp. 69–83.
  17. Doucoure, C.M., de Wit, M.J., and Mushayandebvu, M.F., Effective Elastic Thickness of the Continental Lithosphere in South Africa, J. Geophys. Res., 1996, vol. 101, pp. 11291–11304. · DOI
  18. Dressler, B.O., General Geology of the Sudbury Area, in The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure: Ontario Geological Survey Special, Pye, E.G., Naldrett, A.J., and Giblin, P.E., Eds., Ontario: Ministry of Natural Resoursec of Canada, 1984, vol. 1, pp. 57–82.
  19. Dutta, U., Biswas, N., Martirosyan, A., et al., Estimation of Earthquake Source Parameters and Site Response in Anchorage, Alaska from Strong-Motion Network Data Using Generalized Inversion Method, Phys. Earth, Planet. Inter., 2003, vol. 137, pp. 13–29. · DOI
  20. Ebbing, J., Janle, P., Koulouris, J., et al., 3D Gravity Modelling of the Chicxulub Impact Structure, Planet. Space Sci., 2001, vol. 49, pp. 599–609. · DOI
  21. Foya, S.N., Gibson, R.L., and Reimold, W.U., Impact-Related Hydrothermal Alteration of Witwatersrand Gold Reefs in the Vredefort Dome and Witwatersrand Gold-fields, South Africa, Met. Plan. Sci., 1999, vol. 34(Suppl.), p. 37.
  22. Gibson, R.L. and Reimold, W.U., Thermal Metamorphic Signature of An Impact Event in the Vredefort Dome, South Africa, Geology, 1998, vol. 26, no.9, pp. 787–790. · DOI
  23. Gibson, R.L., Reimold, W.U., and Stevens, G., Impact-Related Metamorphism in the Vredefort Dome, South Africa, in 29th Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf., 1998, Abstract #1360.
  24. Gibson, R.L. and Reimold, W.U., The Metamorphic Finger-print of Large Impact Events: The Example of the Vre-defort Dome, South Africa, Met. Plan. Sci., 1999a, vol. 34(Suppl.), p. 42.
  25. Gibson, R.L. and Reimold, W.U., The Significance of the Vredefort Dome for the Thermal and Structural Evolution of the Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa, Mineral. Pertol., 1999b, vol. 66, pp. 5–23. · DOI
  26. Gibson, R.L. and Jones, M.Q.W., Late Archean to Paleoproterozoic Geotherms in the Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa: Constraints on the Thermal Evolution of the Witwatersrand Basin, Basin Res., 2002, vol. 14, pp. 169–181. · DOI
  27. Grajales-Nishimura, J.M., Cedillo-Pardo, E., Rosales-Dominguez, C., et al., Chicxulub Impact: The Origin of Reservoir and Seal Facies in the Southeastern Mexico Oil Fields, Geology, 2000, vol. 28, pp. 307–310. · DOI
  28. Grieve, R.A.F., Robertson, P.B., and Dence, M.R., Constraints on the Formation of the Ring Impact Structures, in Multiring Basins, Schultz, P.H. and Merrill, R.B., Eds., New York: Pergamon, 1981, pp. 37–57.
  29. Grieve, R.A.F., Stoffler, D., and Deutsch, A., The Sudbury Structure: Controversial or Misunderstood?, J. Geophys. Res., 1991, vol. 96, pp. 22753–22764. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Grieve, R.A.F. and Cintala, M.J., An Analysis of Differential Impact Melt-Crater Scaling and Implications for the Terrestrial Impact Record, Meteoritics, 1992, vol. 27, pp. 526–538. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Grieve, R.A.F. and Cintala, M.J., Planetary Differences in Impact Melting, Adv. Space Res., 1997, vol. 20, pp. 1551–1560. · DOI
  32. Grieve, R. and Therriault, A., Vredefort, Sudbury, Chicxulub: Three of a Kind?, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 2000, vol. 28, pp. 305–338. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Guillou, L., Mareschal, J.-C., Jaupart, C., et al., Heat Flow, Gravity and Structure of the Abitibi Belt, Superior Province, Canada: Implications for Mantle Heat Flow, Tectonophysics, 1994, vol. 122, pp. 103–123.
  34. Gupta, S.C., Ahrens, T.J., and Yang, W., Shock Induced Vaporization of Anhydrite CaSO4 and Calcite CaCO3, in APS Meeting Abstracts, 1999. · DOI
  35. Henkel, H. and Reimold, W.U., Geophysical Modeling and Reconstruction of the Vredefort Impact Structure, South Africa, Met. Plan. Sci., 1996, vol. 31, p. 59.
  36. Hildebrand, A.R., Penfield, G.T., Kring, D.A., et al., Chicxulub Crater: A Possible Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Impact Crater on the Yucatan Peninsula, Geology, 1991, vol. 19, pp. 867–871. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Ivanov, B.A., Bazilevskii, A.T., Krivchkov, V.P., et al., Impact Craters of Venus-Analysis of Venera 15 and 16 Data, J. Geophys. Res., 1986, vol. 91, pp. 413–430. · DOI
  38. Ivanov, B.A., The Morphometry of Impact Craters on Venus, Astron. Vestn., 1989, vol. 23, no.1, pp. 39–49.
  39. Ivanov, B.A., Nemchinov, I.V., Svetsov, V.A., et al., Impact Cratering on Venus: Physical and Mechanical Models, J. Geophys. Res. E, 1992, vol. 97, no.10, pp. 16167–16181. · DOI
  40. Ivanov, B.A. and Ford, P.G., The Depths of the Largest Impact Craters on Venus, 24th Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf., 1993, pp. 689–690.
  41. Ivanov, B.A., Badukov, D.D., Yakovlev, O.I., et al., Degassing of Sedimentary Rocks Due to Chicxulub Impact: Hydrocode and Physical Simulations, Geol. Soc. Spec. Pap., 1996, vol. 307, pp. 125–139.
  42. Ivanov, B.A., Basilevsky, A.T., and Neukum, G., Atmospheric Entry of Large Meteoroids: Implication To Titan, Planet. Space Sci., 1997, vol. 45, pp. 993–1007. · DOI
  43. Ivanov, B.A. and Deutsch, A., Sudbury Impact Event: Cratering Mechanics and Thermal History, in Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution II, Dressler, B., and Sharpton, V.L., Eds., Boulder: Geological Soc. Am., 1999, pp. 389–397.
  44. Ivanov, B.A., Large Impact Crater Modeling: Chicxulub, Third International Conference on Large Meteorite Impacts, Nordlingen, Germany, 2003, Houston: Lunar Planet. Inst., 2003a, Abstract #4067; http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meet-ings/largeimpacts2003/pdf/4067.pdf.
  45. Ivanov, B.A., Modification of ANEOS for Rocks in Compression, Impact Cratering: Bridging the Gap Between Modeling and Observations, February, LPI Contrib., no. 1155, 2003, Houston: Lunar Planet. Inst., 2003b, p. 40.
  46. Ivanov, B., Multi-Ring Basins: Modeling Terrestrial Analogs, 40th Vernadsky/Brown Microsymposium on Comparative Planetology, Moscow, 2004, Moscow: Vernadsky Institute, 2004a, CD-ROM #30.
  47. Ivanov, B.A., Heating of the Lithosphere during Meteorite Cratering, Astron. Vestn., 2004b, vol. 38, no.4, pp. 304–318 [Sol. Syst. Res. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 38, no. 4, p. 266–279].
  48. Ivanov, B.A., Langenhorst, F., Deutsch, A., et al., Anhydrite EOS and Phase Diagram in Relation To Shock Decomposition, 35th Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf., 2004, Abstract #1489.
  49. Ivanov, B.A., Shock Melting of Permafrost on Mars: Water Ice Multiphase Equation of State for Numerical Modeling and Its Testing, Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf., 2005, Abstract #1232.
  50. James, D.E. and Fouch, M.J., VanDecar J.C., et al., Tectospheric Structure Beneath Southern Africa, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2001, vol. 28, no.13, pp. 2485–2488. · DOI
  51. Jaupart, C. and Mareschal, J.C., The Thermal Structure and Thickness of Continental Roots, Lithos, 1999, vol. 48, pp. 93–114. · DOI
  52. Krogh, T.E., Davis, D.W., and Corfu, F., Precise of U-Pb Zir-con and Baddeleyite Ages for the Sudbury Area, in The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, Pye, E.G., Naldrett, A.J., and Giblin, P.E., Eds., Ontario: Ontario Geological Survay, 1984, vol. 1, pp. 431–446.
  53. Kuznetsov, N.M., Kinetics of Shock-Wave Phase Transformation of Quartz, in Udarnye volny i ekstremal'nye sostoyaniya veshchestva (Shock Waves and Extreme States of Material) Fortov, V.E., Al'tshuler, L.V., Trunin, R.F., and Funtikov, A.I., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 2000, pp. 199–218.
  54. Lana, C., Gibson, R.L., Kisters, A.F.M., et al., Archean Crustal Structure of the Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa-Evidence from the Vredefort Dome, Tectonophysics, 2003a, vol. 206, pp. 133–144.
  55. Lana, C., Gibson, R.L., and Reimold, W.U., Impact Tectonics in the Core of the Vredefort Dome, South Africa: Implications for Central Uplift Formation in Very Large Impact Structures, Met. Plan. Sci., 2003b, vol. 38, pp. 1093–1107. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Lana, C., Reimold, W.U., Gibson, R.L., et al., Nature of the Archean Midcrust in the Core of the Vredefort Dome, Central Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa 1, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2004, vol. 68, pp. 623–642. · DOI
  57. Landau, L. and Lifshits, E., Statisticheskaya fizika (Statistical Physics), Leningrad: Tekhniko-Teor. Literatura, 1951.
  58. Langenhorst, F., Deutsch, A., Hornemann, U., et al., On the Shock Behaviour of Anhydrite: Experimental Results and Natural Observations, 34th Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf., 2003, Abstract #1638.
  59. Masaitis, V.L., Mikhailov, M.V., and Selivanovskaya, T.V., Popigaiskii meteoritnyi krater (Popigai Meteorite Crater), Moscow: Nauka, 1975.
  60. Masaitis, V.L., Danilin, A.N., Mashchak, M.S., et al., Geologiya astroblem (Geology of Astroblemes), Leningrad: Nedra, 1980.
  61. Masaitis, V.L. and Raikhlin, A.I., The Popigai Crater Was Formed by the Impact of an Ordinary Chondrite, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1986, vol. 286, no.6, pp. 159–163.
  62. Masaitis, V.L., Impactites from Popigai Crater, in Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution, Grieve, R.A.F., Sharpton, V.L., and Dressler, B.O., Eds., Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., 1994, vol. 293, pp. 153–162. · DOI
  63. Masaitis, V.L., Mashchak, M.S., and Raikhlin, A.I., et. al., Almazonosnye impaktity Popigaiskoi astroblemy (Diamond-Bearing Impactites of the Popigai Astrobleme), St. Petersburg: VSEGEYa, 1998.
  64. Masaitis, V.L., Popigai Crater: Origin and Distribution of Diamond-Bearing Impactites, Met. Plan. Sci., 1998, vol. 33, pp. 349–359. · DOI
  65. Masaitis, V.L., Mashchak, M.S., and Naumov, M.V., Original Diameter and Depth of Erosion of the Popigai Impact Crater, Russia, Third International Conference on Large Meteorite Impacts, Nordlingen, Germany, 2003, Houston: Lunar Planet. Inst., 2003, Abstract #4039; http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/largeimpacts2003/pdf/4039.pdf.
  66. McKinnon, W.B., Zahnle, K.J., Ivanov, B.A., et al., Cratering on Venus: Models and Observations, in Venus II, Bougher, S.W., Hunten, D.M., and Phillips, R.J., Eds., Tuscon: Univ. Arizona Press, 1997, pp. 969–1014.
  67. Melosh, H.J., Ryan, E.V., and Asphaug, E., Dynamic Fragmentation in Impacts: Hydrocode Simulation of Laboratory Impacts, J. Geophys. Res., 1992, vol. 97, pp. 14735–14759. · DOI
  68. Melosh, H.J., Impact Cratering–A Geologic Process, New York: Oxford, 1989. Translated under the title Udarnye kratery–geologicheskii protsess, Moscow: Mir, 1994.
  69. Melosh, H.J. and Ivanov, B.A., Impact Crater Collapse, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 1999, vol. 27, pp. 385–415. · DOI
  70. Melosh, H.J., A New and Improved Equation of State for Impact Studies, 31th Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf., Houston, 2000, Abstract #1903.
  71. Milkereit, B., Green, A., Wu, J., et al., Integrated Seismic and Borehole Geophysical Study of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1994a, vol. 21, pp. 931–934. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Milkereit, B., White, D.J., and Green, A.G., Towards an Improved Seismic Imaging Technique for Crustal Structures: The Lithoprobe Sudbury Experiment, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1994b, vol. 21, pp. 927–930. · DOI
  73. Morgan, J. and Warner, M., and the Chicxulub Working Group. Size and Morphology of the Chicxulub Impact Crater, Nature, 1997, vol. 390, pp. 472–476. · DOI · Paper page
  74. Morgan, J.V., Warner, M.R., Collins, G.S., et al., Peak-Ring Formation in Large Impact Craters: Geophysical Constraints from Chicxulub, Tectonophysics, 2000, vol. 183, pp. 347–354.
  75. Moser, D.E., Flowers, R.M., and Hart, R.J., Birth of the Kaapvaal Tectosphere 3.08 Billion Years Ago, Science, 2001, vol. 291, no.5503, pp. 465–468. · DOI
  76. Naldrett, A.J and Hewins, R.H, The Main Mass of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, in The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure: Ontario Geological Survey Special Pye, E.G., Naldrett, A.J., and Giblin, P.E., Eds., Ontario: Ministry of Natural Resources of Canada, 1984, vol. 1, pp. 235–251.
  77. Nguuri, T.K., Gore, J., James, D.E., et al., Crustal Structure Beneath Southern Africa and Its Implications for the Formation and Evolution of the Kaapvaal and Zimbabwe Cratons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2001, vol. 28, no.13, pp. 2502–2504. · DOI
  78. Nikolaeva, O.V., Geochemistry of the Venera 8 Material Demonstrates the Presence of Continental Crust on Venus, Earth, Moon, and Planets, 1990, vol. 50, pp. 329–341. · DOI
  79. O'Keefe, J.D. and Ahrens, T.J., Complex Craters: Relationship of Stratigraphy and Rings To Impact Conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 1999, vol. 104, pp. 27091–27104. · DOI
  80. Papadopoulos, G.A. and Plessa, A., Magnitude-Distance Relations for Earthquake-Induced Landslides in Greece, Engineering Geology, 2000, vol. 58, no.3–4, pp. 377–386. · DOI
  81. Pierazzo, E., Vickery, A.M., and Melosh, H.J., A Reevaluation of Impact Melt Production, Icarus, 1997, vol. 127, pp. 408–423. · DOI
  82. Pierazzo, E., Kring, D.A., and Melosh, H.J., Hydrocode Simulation of the Chicxulub Impact Event and the Production of Climatically Active Gases, J. Geophys. Res., 1998, vol. 103, pp. 28607–28625. · DOI
  83. Pierazzo, E. and Melosh, H.J., Hydrocode Modeling of Chicxulub as An Oblique Impact Event, Tectonophysics, 1999, vol. 165, pp. 163–176.
  84. Pike, R.J., Control of Crater Morphology by Gravity and Target Type-Mars, Earth, Moon, 11th Lunar and Planet. Sci. Conf., New York: Pergamon, 1980, pp. 2159–2189.
  85. Pilkington, M. and Hildebrand, A.R., Three-Dimensional Magnetic Imaging of the Chicxulub Crater, J. Geophys., Res., 2000, vol. 105, pp. 23479–23492. · DOI · Paper page
  86. Pope, K.O., Baines, K.H., Ocampo, A.C., et al., Impact Winter and the Cretaceous/Tertiary Extinctions: Results of a Chicxulub Asteroid Impact Model, Tectonophysics, 1994, vol. 128, pp. 719–725.
  87. Pope, K.O., Baines, K.H., Ocampo, A.C., et al., Energy, Volatile Production, and Climatic Effects of the Chicxulub Cretaceous/Tertiary Impact, J. Geophys. Res., 1997, vol. 102, pp. 21645–21664. · DOI
  88. Reimold, W.U. and Gibson, R.L., Geology and Evolution of the Vredefort Impact Structure, South Africa, Afr. J. Earth Sci., 1996, vol. 23, no.2, pp. 125–162. · DOI
  89. Roest, W.R. and Pilkington, M., Restoring Post-Impact Deformation at Sudbury: A Circular Argument, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1994, vol. 21, pp. 959–962. · DOI
  90. Rozen, O.M., Bibikova, E.V., and Zhuravlev, A.B., Early Crust of the Anabar Shield: Age and Formation Models, in Rannyaya kora Zemli: sostav i vozrast (Early Crust of the Earth: Composition and Age), Mergasov, G.G., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1991, pp. 199–244.
  91. Rosen, O.M., Condie, K.C., Natapov, L.M., et al., Archean and Early Proterozoic Evolution of the Siberian Craton: A Preliminary Assessment, in Developments in Precambrian Geology, Windley, B.F., Ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994, pp. 411–459.
  92. Schmidt, R.M. and Housen, K.R., Some Recent Advances in the Scaling of Impact and Explosion Cratering, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1987, vol. 5, pp. 543–560. · DOI · Paper page
  93. Shanks, W.S. and Schwerdtner, W.M., Crude Quantitative Estimates of the Original Northwest-Southwest Dimension of the Sudbury Structure, South Central Canadian Shield, Can. J. Earth Sci., 1991, vol. 28, pp. 1677–1686. · DOI
  94. Stevens, G., Armstrong, R.A., and Gibson, R.L., Pre-and Postimpact Metamorphism in the Core of the Vredefort Dome: Clues To Crustal Response at a Massive Meteorite Strike, Met. Plan. Sci., 1999, vol. 34(Suppl.), p. 112.
  95. Stoffler, D. and Langenhorst, F., Shock Metamorphism of Quartz in Nature and Experiment: I. Basic Observation and Theory, Meteoritics, 1994, vol. 29, pp. 155–181. · DOI
  96. Stoffler, D., Artemieva, N.A., Ivanov, B.F., et al., Origin and Emplacement of the Impact Formations at Chicxulub, Mexico, As Revealed by the ICDP Deep Drilling at Yaxcopoil-1 and by Numerical Modeling, Met. Plan. Sci., 2004, vol. 39, no.7, pp. 1035–1067. · DOI · Paper page
  97. Stroenie zemnoi kory Anabarskogo shchita (Structure of the Terrestrial Crust of the Anabar Shield), Moralev, V.M., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1986.
  98. Surkov, Y.A. and Barsukov, V.L., Composition, Structure and Properties of Venus Rocks, Adv. in Space Res, 1985, vol. 5, pp. 17–29. · DOI
  99. Swisher, C.C., Grajales-Nishimura, J.M., Montanari, A., et al., Coeval 40Ar/39Ar Ages of 65.0 Million Years Ago from Chicxulub Crater Melt Rock and Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Tektites, Science, 1992, vol. 257, pp. 954–958. · DOI · Paper page
  100. Therriault, A.M., Grieve, R.A.F., and Reimold, W.U., Original Size of the Vredefort Structure: Implications for the Geological Evolution of the Witwatersrand Basin, Met. Plan. Sci., 1997, vol. 32, pp. 71–77. · DOI · Paper page
  101. Thompson, S.L. and Lauson, H.S., Improvements in the Chart-D radiation hydrodynamic code III: Revised analytical equation of state, Albuquerque: Sandia Laboratories, 1972, SC-RR-71 0714.
  102. Turtle, E.P. and Pierazzo, E., Constraints on the Size of the Vredefort Impact Crater from Numerical Modeling, Met. Plan. Sci., 1998, vol. 33, pp. 483–490. · DOI · Paper page
  103. Turtle, E.P., Pierazzo, E., and O'Brien, D.P., Numerical Modeling of Impact Heating and Cooling of the Vredefort Impact Structure, Met. Plan. Sci., 2003, vol. 38, pp. 293–303. · DOI
  104. Wieland, F., Gibson, R.L., Reimold, W.U., et al., Structural Evolution of the Central Uplift of the Vredefort Impact Structure, South Africa, Met. Plan. Sci., 2003, vol. 38(Suppl.), p. 5027.
  105. Wieland, F. and Reimold, W.U., Field and Laboratory Studies on Shatter Cones in the Vredefort Dome, South Africa, and Their Genesis, Met. Plan. Sci., 2003, vol. 38(Suppl.), p. 5016.
  106. Wu, J., Milkereit, B., and Boerner, D.E., Seismic Imaging of the Enigmatic Sudbury Structure, J. Geophys. Res., 1995, vol. 100, pp. 4117–4130. · DOI
  107. Wunnemann, K. and Ivanov, B.A., Numerical Modelling of the Impact Crater Depth-Diameter Dependence in An Acoustically Fluidized Target, Planet. Space Sci., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 831–845. · DOI
  108. Zharkov, V.N. and Kalinin, V.A., Uravneniya sostoyaniya tverdykh tel pri vysokikh davleniyakh i temperaturakh, Moscow: Nauka, 1968. Translated under the title Equations of State for Solids at High Pressures and Temperatures, New York: Consultants Bureau, 1971.
  109. Zeldovich, Ya.B. and Raizer, Yu.P., Fizika Udarnykh Voln i Vysokotemperaturnykh Gidrodinamicheskikh Yavlenii, Moscow: Nauka, 1966. Translated under the title Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena, New York: Academic Press, 1967.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ivanov, B. A.
Venue
Solar System Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-09
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
381-409
ISSN
  • 0038-0946
  • 1608-3423
DOI
10.1007/s11208-005-0051-0
Cited by
168
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review