The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial Validity, Location in the Personality Facet Space, Demographic Pattern, and Normative Data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585 · cited 1×
“Sociological and psychological accounts of people’s need for justice have been offered by a number of influential theories such as relative deprivation theory (Crosby, 1976; Stouffer, Suchman, DeVinney, Star, & Williams, 1949; Walker & Smith, 2002), equity theory (Adams, 1965; Walster, Walster, & Berscheid, 1978), jus…”
BackgroundTo parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 · Cited by 6,552
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
Altruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1 · Cited by 3,318
Lerner, M. J. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5 · Cited by 2,656
Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.76.2.229 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000217 · Cited by 689
Brady, W. J., Crockett, M. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620917336 · Cited by 417
Justice and rejection sensitivity in children and adolescents with ADHD symptoms
Bondü, R., & Esser, G. (2015) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-014-0560-9 · Cited by 59
Is higher inequality less legitimate? Depends on How You Frame it!
Bruckmüller, S., Reese, G., & Martiny, S. E. (2017) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12202 · Cited by 38
The job perception inventory: Considering human factors and needs in the design of human-AI work
Berretta, S., Tausch, A., Peifer, C., & Kluge, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128945 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J.
- Venue
- Social Justice Research
- Published
- 2010-07-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 211-238
- ISSN
- 0885-7466 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6725
- OpenAlex
- W1983603959
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial Validity, Location in the Personality Facet Space, Demographic Pattern, and Normative Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2
- The paper
- Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial Validity, Location in the Personality Facet Space, Demographic Pattern, and Normative Data. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
