Cited by 63Science Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Effects of a training intervention to foster argumentation skills while processing conflicting scientific positions

Hefter, Markus H., Berthold, Kirsten, Renkl, Alexander, Riess, Werner, Schmid, Sebastian, Fries, Stefan·2014·Instructional Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11251-014-9320-y

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hefter, M. H., Berthold, K., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Schmid, S., & Fries, S.
Affiliations
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Education Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Hefter, Markus H.
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2014-05-06
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
929-947
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W1968362912
Cited by
63
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
argumentation skills, sustainable development, ecology education, evaluative knowledge, generative knowledge, argument quality, self-explanation, science education, informed citizenship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review