Cited by 136Education and Technology IntegrationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Teachers as participatory designers: two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments

Cober, Rebecca, Tan, Esther, Slotta, Jim, So, Hyo-Jeong, Könings, Karen D.·2015·Instructional Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For collaborative design to be successful, it is key to establish horizontal relationships of mutual learning in which stakeholders' knowledge and contributions are valued.

    “For collaborative design to be successful, it is key to establish horizontal relationships of mutual learning in which stakeholders’ knowledge and contributions are valued (Druin, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cober, R., Tan, E., Slotta, J., So, H.-J., & Könings, K. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Cober, Rebecca
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2015-01-15
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
203-228
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2056095986
Cited by
136
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
52.07
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
participatory design, technology-enhanced learning environments, collaborative prototyping, contextual inquiry, teacher professional development, design partnerships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review