The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teachers as participatory designers: two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For collaborative design to be successful, it is key to establish horizontal relationships of mutual learning in which stakeholders’ knowledge and contributions are valued (Druin, 2014).”
From Designing learning technology collaboratively: analysis of a chatbot co-design (2023) · cites this paper as Druin, 2014
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,639
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
(2017) · Cited by 16,036
Męcfal, S. (2012) · University of Lodz Repository (University of Łódź) · Cited by 6,617
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
(2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833 · Cited by 4,675
Brown, A. L. (1992) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2 · Cited by 4,000
Design Experiments in Educational Research
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032001009 · Cited by 3,548
Bødker, S., Dindler, C., Iversen, O. S., & Smith, R. C. (2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203744338 · Cited by 1,517
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833.008 · Cited by 1,159
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Suchman, L. (1993). Forward. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices (pp. vii–ix). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–136 of 136
Promoting Blended Learning Adoption Through Institutional Policies and Practices in Singapore
Viswanathan, G. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9388-4_6 · Cited by 1
Castillo, H. G. C., Ríos, A. E., Ortíz, R. V., Quintero, M. M., & Zúñiga, M. A. F. (2025) · doi:10.25100/peu.864 · Cited by 1
Messy Design: Organic Planning for Blended Learning
Rankin, A., Haggis, J., Luzeckyj, A., & Gare, C. (2016) · Journal of Learning Design · doi:10.5204/jld.v9i2.267 · Cited by 1
Vilbar, A. P., & Ferrer-Malaque, C. (2016) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa.2016.7785407 · Cited by 1
Wu, L., & He, S. (2021) · Studies in Singapore education · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4469-6_10 · Cited by 1
Teachers’ Experiences and Role in the Design Process of Online Degree Programmes in Higher Education
Joshi, M., & Kantola, M. (2022) · Seminar net · doi:10.7577/seminar.4698 · Cited by 1
Essam, R. (2019) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · doi:10.17635/lancaster/thesis/714 · Cited by 1
An Ubuntu lens to co-design: Towards a rural community engagement framework
Kapuire, G. K. (2023) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.242457 · Cited by 1
Developing an Experiential Internship Program with Social Media and a Participatory Design Approach
Chu, S. K. W. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1560-6_6
Towards a strong professional identity within higher education
Engelbertink, M. M. J. (2021) · doi:10.3990/1.9789464192179
Investigating Teaching and Learning Processes of An online Course From Multiple Perspectives
Ouyang, F. (2018) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota)
Суханова, Е. Ю., Антипов, О. В., & Гежа, Р. В. (2022) · ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ · doi:10.37882/2223-2982.2022.01.31
Exploring the Role of Mobile Learning in Global Education
Kasemsap, K. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8047-9.ch064
Teachers as Designers: Many Threads of Meaning
Warr, M. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1443624
Co-Design of Augmented Reality Games for Learning with Teachers: A methodological approachPreprint
Tobar-Muñoz, H. F., Baldiris, S., & Fabregat, R. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1988443/v1
Shemy, I. E., Jaccheri, L., Giannakos, M. N., & Vulchanova, M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4806062
Erol, S., & Hörbe, R. (2025) · Lecture notes in mechanical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-77429-4_11
Barkoczi, N., Roman, A. F., & Maier, M. L. (2024) · Educatia 21 · doi:10.24193/ed21.2024.28.12
Blending UX, CoDesign and Learning Experience for Educational Technology Product Design
Mavri, A., Ioannou, A., & Kitsis, A. (2025) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016292
Liu, Z., Shi, X., Wang, K., & Liu, R. (2025) · Proceedings. · doi:10.22318/icls2025.374209
Designing EdTech tools using a codesign model: a multi-stakeholder design case
Mavri, A., Ioannou, A., & Kitsis, A. (2025) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2025.2540928 · Cited by 1
Şimşek, İ., Can, T., & Küçük, S. (2025) · Culture and Education · doi:10.1177/11356405251393048
Suliman, S., Allen, M. E., Al-Moslih, A., Carr, A. S., Koopmans, R. P., & Könings, K. D. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26732581
Self-citationTeacher Co-Design in a CS for all Research-Practice Partnership
Florence, R. S., Adrion, W. R., Catherine, T., & Emrah, P. (2022) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64802-908-020251004
Emergence of the Learning Sciences in South Korea: Current Landscape and Future Directions
Han, I., Cho, Y. S., Lim, K. Y., Jo, I.-H., & Jeong, H. (2026) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-3901-4_20-1
Fostering Reflective Learning Through Visual Search Stories
Botturi, L., Profeta, G., Battipede, E., Saad, M., Fels, D., Mazzoni, P., Baier‐Mosch, F., Hermida, M., Hahnel, C., & Giordano, S. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17272-3_34
Reflections on teacher-researcher collaboration in a design-based science education project
McMain, E. M., Gotch, C. M., Jiang, K., Dydasco, C. G., & Premo, J. (2026) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2026.2639023
Kim, M., Kim, B., Heo, W., & Lee, B. (2026) · The Mathematical Education · doi:10.63311/mathedu.25.6511
Modèle et outil pour assister la scénarisation des activités pédagogiques orientées RV
Mahdi, O. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/21109733z7855z4a06zba34z07d352855660
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., Viriyavejakul, C., & Rahman, S. S. (2026) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2026.2661643
Roversa: A low-cost, multilingual robotics platform for K-12 computer science integration
Bredder, E., Wilkens, K., Espinal, A., Vieira, C., Bonet, P. H., Bailey, J., & Chiu, J. L. (2026) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-026-10628-9
Co-designing Bilingual Speech Interaction for Inclusive Geometry Learning
Almomen, R., Abbara, S., Almudaiheem, A., Muhammed, H., Hassan, M., & Al‐Wabil, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29653-5_35
Linguistic unease in multi-domain co-design interactions
Prestigiacomo, R., & Carbajal-Carrera, B. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-026-01722-1
Pan, Y., & Aslam, M. Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1785568
Ponet, B., van de Kerckhove, A., Dewitte, S., Cotzaridis, P., Vantieghem, W., & Vanderlinde, R. (2026) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2026.2731042
Giacchi, I., Saija, E., Lonigro, A., Cacciamani, S., Zava, F., & Vecchio, G. M. (2026) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-026-10037-0
Metadata
- Authors
- Cober, R., Tan, E., Slotta, J., So, H.-J., & Könings, K. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Cober, Rebecca
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2015-01-15
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-228
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2056095986
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 52.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- participatory design, technology-enhanced learning environments, collaborative prototyping, contextual inquiry, teacher professional development, design partnerships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review