Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The act of providing peer feedback requires students to actively (re)consider the assignment criteria, which may improve their own subsequent writing performance.
“The act of providing peer feedback also requires students to actively (re)consider the assignment criteria, which may improve their own subsequent writing performance (Flower et al. 1986; Patchan and Schunn 2015).”
From The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students' academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Patchan and Schunn 2015
Instructional support in peer-feedback may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages.
“With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022;Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Patchan & Schunn, 2015
Instructional support in peer-feedback may help students deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers.
“With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022;Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Patchan & Schunn, 2015
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,588 · see citing works
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,406 · see citing works
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,385 · see citing works
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882 · see citing works
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5376 · Cited by 4,217 · see citing works
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466 · see citing works
An Integrated Theory of the Mind.
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C. J., & Qin, Y. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1036 · Cited by 3,048 · see citing works
Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203728178 · Cited by 2,926 · see citing works
Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems
Chi, M. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(89)90002-5 · Cited by 2,287 · see citing works
The Atomic Components of Thought
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. J. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315805696 · Cited by 2,181 · see citing works
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714 · see citing works
Topping, K. J. (2005) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410500345172 · Cited by 1,597 · see citing works
Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6607196 · Cited by 1,501 · see citing works
Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6607199.v1 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
The transfer of cognitive skill
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2989 · Cited by 1,250 · see citing works
The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I).
Woodworth, R. S., & Thorndike, E. L. (1901) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0074898 · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
A cognitive process theory of writing
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc198115885 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Vinkhuyzen, R. E., Verschure, P. F. M. J., & Newell, A. (1994) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422886 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Receiving specific comments has been found to be more effective than receiving less specific comments (Ferris 1997).”
BackgroundThe nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Self-citationScaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Self-citationDetection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision
Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/357381 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback
Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2009) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Self-citationPeer reviewers learn from giving comments
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback
Lu, J., & Law, N. W. Y. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021950 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics
(1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571374 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments
Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000103 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationRedefining Revision for Freshmen
Wallace, D. L., & Hayes, J. R. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315044620-37 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2009.01.02.2 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, L., Liu, X., & Zhou, Y. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01180.x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Learning to Write in a Genre: What Student Writers Take from Model Texts
Charney, D., & Carls, R. A. (1995) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199515358 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Redefining Revision for Freshmen
Wallace, D. L., & Hayes, J. R. (1991) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199115475 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Paradoxical effects of feedback in international online reciprocal peer tutoring
Topping, K. J., Dehkinet, R., Blanch, S., Corcelles, M., & Durán, D. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.002 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revisions
Patchan, M. M., Hawk, B. N., Stevens, C. A., & Schunn, C. D. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9236-3 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding the Effectiveness of Online Peer Assessment: A Path Model
Lu, J.-Y., & Zhang, Z. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.46.3.f · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Understanding the benefits of receiving peer feedback: A case of matching ability in peer-review
Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2016) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.03 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationReading, writing, and language learning
Rosenberg, S. D. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Roediger, H. L., III (2007) · APS observer · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Expanding Horizons: Research on Underrepresented Groups
Wang, S. (2007) · APS observer · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Inuzuka, M. (2005) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Chi (1996) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199611)10:7
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000103 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationLatifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13054 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Bauer, E., Greisel, M., Kuznetsov, I., Berndt, M., Kollar, I., Dresel, M., Fischer, M. R., & Fischer, F. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13336 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Incorporating <scp>AI</scp> and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13233 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Huang, C., Tu, Y., Han, Z., Jiang, F., Wu, F. Q., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104910 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review
Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T. W., & Verbaan, C.-L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11683-y · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationCao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Yu, S. (2019) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Gao, Y., Schunn, C. D. D., & Yu, Q. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1499075 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationChang, D., Hwang, G., Chang, S., & Wang, S. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10062-z · Cited by 78 · see citing works
EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study
Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationKrause, M., Garncarz, T., Song, J., Gerber, E. M., Bailey, B. P., & Dow, S. P. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025883 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Chiang, C., Kasunic, A., & Savage, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274306 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
The End is the Beginning is the End: The closed-loop learning analytics framework
Sailer, M., Ninaus, M., Huber, S. E., Bauer, E., & Greiff, S. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108305 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationSupporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script
Latifi, S., & Noroozi, O. (2021) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1961097 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2021) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-021-09389-4 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Understanding the what and when of peer feedback benefits for performance and transfer
Yu, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107857 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationHuisman, B., Admiraal, W., Pilli, O., van de Ven, M., & Saab, N. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12520 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing
Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Changes in the reliability and validity of peer assessment across the college years
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., Li, W.-T., & Long, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1724260 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationLipowsky, F. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-61403-7_4 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics
Johnson, A. C., Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2017) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Supporting the development of collaboration and feedback skills in instructional designers
Lowell, V. L., & Ashby, I. V. (2018) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-018-9170-8 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Incidencia de la revisión por pares en la construcción de textos académicos a nivel universitario
Pereira, M. M. B. (2021) · DELTA Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada · doi:10.1590/1678-460x202153017 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Peters, O., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0344-y · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Benefits of Peer Review on Students’ Writing
Yalch, M. M., Vitale, E. M., & Ford, J. K. (2019) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725719835070 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Providing Formative Peer Feedback
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.020 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Polakowski, N. L., Gunderson, B., Shultz, G. V., & Gere, A. R. (2021) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883211006038 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Lu, Q., Zhu, X., & Cheong, C. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739962 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Variability in students' evaluating processes in peer assessment with calibrated peer review
Russell, J. M., Horne, S. V., Ward, A. S., Bettis, E. A., & Gikonyo, J. (2017) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12176 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Huisman, B., Saab, N., DRIEL, J. H. V., & van den Broek, P. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1325854 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1485012 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Su, W., & Huang, A. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.2004389 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Incorporating Training, Self-monitoring and AI-Assistance to Improve Peer Feedback Quality
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Abdi, S., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/3491140.3528265 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Explicating peer feedback quality and its impact on feedback implementation in EFL writing
He, W., & Gao, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177094 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Epp, C. D., Akçayır, G., & Phirangee, K. (2019) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2019.1642189 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Wang, X.-M., Yu, X.-H., Hwang, G., & Hu, Q.-N. (2023) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10257-6 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09884-y · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., Henderikx, M., & Kalz, M. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1893650 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Li, M., Cukurova, M., & Jong, M. S. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13376 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Automated Writing Instruction and Feedback: Instructional Mode, Attitudes, and Revising
Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Johnson, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621471 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
What does it take to provide effective peer feedback?
Little, T., Dawson, P., Boud, D. J., & Tai, J. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2475059 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Brkić, L., Mekterović, I., Fertalj, M., & Mekterović, D. (2024) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105001 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Tran, T. Y., & Ma, Q. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101418 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Gao, Y., An, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101252 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationDingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2018) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.02.002 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…peer-feedback may improve different kinds of peer-feedback processes and outcomes: With respect to peer-feedback processes, it may help students formulate high-quality feedback messages or deeply elaborate on the feedback they receive from their peers (Lui & Andrade, 2022; Patchan & Schunn, 2015).”
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100959 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107056 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationPeer review in academic writing: Different perspectives from instructors and students
Ahmed, R. A. (2020) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.537 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Pre-service music teacher perceptions of peer feedback
Legette, R. M., & Royo, J. (2019) · Research Studies in Music Education · doi:10.1177/1321103x19862298 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10115-x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., Maqbool, S., & Javed, S. (2024) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1155/2024/1271802 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Aben, J. E. J., Dingyloudi, F., Timmermans, A. C., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_7 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Students’ perceptions of online peer feedback in process-oriented L2 writing: A qualitative inquiry
İrgin, P., & Bilki, Z. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101403 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Shulgina, G., Costley, J., Щеглова, И. А., Zhang, H., & Sedova, N. S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00315-8 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Reviewer, essay, and reviewing-process characteristics that predict errors in web-based peer review
Xiong, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104146 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationAstrid, A., Rukmini, D., Fitriati, S. W., & Syafryadin, S. (2021) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2021.10585 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Al-Obaydi, L. H., & Pikhart, M. (2025) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-025-00375-8 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Berg, S. A., & Moon, A. C. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00213a · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning
Lam, C. N. C., & Habil, H. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.3.25 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The Use of Peer Assessment to Improve Students’ Learning of Geometry
Omar, S. N. P., Shahrıll, M., & Sajali, M. Z. (2018) · European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research · doi:10.26417/ejser.v5i2.p203-222 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ge, Z.-G. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1643743 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wu, H., Zhu, H., & Yang, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059555 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Watts, F. M., & Shultz, G. V. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100808 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Alemdağ, E., & Narciss, S. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00522-4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Consistency in providing peer feedback: the role of individual and situational factors
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Banihashem, S. K., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2517617 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationGyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Khosravi, H. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10346-0 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Shulgina, G., Fanguy, M., Zhang, H., Courtney, M. G. R., Baldwin, M., & Costley, J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105104 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Modeling Student Evaluations of Writing and Authors as a Function of Writing Errors
Roscoe, R. D., Wilson, J., Patchan, M. M., Chen, D., & Johnson, A. C. (2020) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2020.10316 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationOpening Pandora’s Box: How Does Peer Assessment Affect EFL Students’ Writing Quality?
Meletiadou, E. (2021) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages6030115 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Police education and role play: Insights from the literature
Turner, A. H. (2021) · The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles · doi:10.1177/0032258x211031516 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Franke, U., Backfisch, I., Scherzinger, L., Tolou, A., Thyssen, C., Brahm, T., Rudolf, I., & Lachner, A. (2024) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10403-8 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Zong, Z., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09401-4 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, W., Lyu, Q., & Su, J. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09667-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Greisel, M., Hornstein, J., & Kollar, I. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101438 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2022) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-021-09939-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Comparing motivational features between feedback givers and receivers in English speaking class
Su, W. (2022) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2021-0197 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Do learners learn from corrective peer feedback? Insights from students
Jiang, X., & Ironsi, S. S. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101385 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Jin, M., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Li, Q., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101394 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Influencia de la rúbrica en la calidad de la retroalimentación del desempeño docente en aula
Kenigs, O. A. A., Hernández, M. E. M., & Montanero, M. (2023) · Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa · doi:10.24320/redie.2023.25.e04.4326 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A GEARed peer feedback model and implications for learning facilitation
Huang, S.-C. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1439881 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Students’ Perceptions on Online Peer Feedback Practice In EFL Writing
Putra, I. G. K. M., Santosa, M. H., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2021) · IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) · doi:10.15408/ijee.v8i2.21488 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Costley, J., Courtney, M. G. R., Shulgina, G., & Fanguy, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13032-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lai, C., Pan, M., Guo, K., & Cui, Y. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105675 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Xie, X., Nimehchisalem, V., Yong, M. F., & Yap, N. T. (2024) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/vol15no1.19 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
English Education Master Students' Perceptions on Peer Feedback in Academic Writing
Wijaya, K. F. (2022) · Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning · doi:10.18196/ftl.v7i1.12751 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Testing an Evaluation Tool to Facilitate Police Officers’ Peer Review of Child Interviews
Danby, M. C., Sharman, S. J., & Guadagno, B. L. (2022) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-022-09516-8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
AssessChain: A hybrid blockchain-based system for transparent and reliable online assessment
Qingyi, Y., Liang-min, W., Pan, S., Yifan, Z., & Li, J. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12713-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pieters, J., Verstegen, D. M. L., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Warmenhoven, F. C., & Everdingen, M. H. J. V. D. B.-V. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02681-0 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patchan, Melissa M.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2015-05-30
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 591-614
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W918950316
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 41.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- peer feedback, peer assessment, peer review, text quality, writing revision, feedback content, praise and criticism, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
